too many boobs.


perhaps it is because i am a woman, but i thought there were too many boobs. it was okay at first but by the end it just seemed so pointless.

his take on women being beautiful forms seemed contradictory, because with the girl he liked he never focused on her boobs and ass, and with every other woman, that's all he focused on.

i don't know. it just seems like an excuse to put model boobs in every shot that it was possible to put it into. that's the only real thing i hated about the movie i guess. even half the boobs they showed in the movie would have been okay. there were just too many. and like, since when do 7 supermodel chicks shop in the supermarket individually at like 5am. lol.

does anyone else feel this way? probably not. meh.

to give them credit, though, i don't think i've seen this many boobs in one film er, ever (pornos and b horror movies included). that's kind of a feat, i guess.

ps - the transitions between present and past were bomb diggity.

reply

You never got enough boobs.

reply

^^^^

exactly

reply

That's like saying "too much fresh air".

reply

Well, I'm a giant lesbo so the boobage was fine with me.

reply

"Once you've seen one pair of boobs...you pretty much want to see them all" - Ron White

I have come here to chew bubble gum and kick ass, and I'm all out of bubble gum

reply

you listen to dr. acula?

reply

why is ron white dr. acula?

reply

3 years ago...you might not even remember much less care, but I think he was just going off the stand-up comic theme because that was one of Mitch Hedberg's purposely stupid jokes. Thats the only connection though and it doesnt make any sense in context....

http://www.imdb.com/list/coi2SOsZMPI/ - Favorite Films Of Every Year 1900-present

reply

caught up on the memory. still care. thanks! :)

reply

This quote is from Rodney Carrington, not Ron White.

reply

No, that was Ron White. It's from his stand-up special "They Call Me Tater Salad"

--
If I cannot smoke cigars in heaven, I shall not go!

reply

I've never agreed more with anyone about anything before. There can't be too many.

reply

[deleted]

That is because we are chauvinistic pigs. Or maybe we just like boobs, women should be flattered, we really like a part of their anatomy. Where is the harm?

reply

I disagree in a way. He did look at her for her beauty as well, but it was just that at first he wasn't looking at her at all. He was still caught up. I even noticed that the film maker made a point to change her make up and what not to make her seem more attractive later on to the audience as well.

I will agree with the point about how silly it is that there were like 5 gorgeous women shopping at the same time, in the same aisle. And overnight none the less. I think perhaps they should have featured some women with less than perfect proportions and of varying ages, as well as model types.

reply

Women who aren't obese or overweight actually look like those women. It's reality, it actually exists in places where people exercise and are concerned with being physically fit where women commonly look like that e.g. Scandinavian countries. Body types like this are common in places where it is socially unacceptable to be over-weight and out-of-shape. Montreal is a place that comes to mind, people make the absolute most out of what nature has given them because that's what the culture around them expects of them.

I always suspect that people who complain about this type of thing lead unhealthy lifestyles where they eat too many carbs and get zero exercise, and don't want to be reminded that people who care about their health and appearance look differently than they do.

reply

"i don't know. it just seems like an excuse to put model boobs in every shot that it was possible to put it into. that's the only real thing i hated about the movie i guess. even half the boobs they showed in the movie would have been okay. there were just too many. and like, since when do 7 supermodel chicks shop in the supermarket individually at like 5am. lol. "

You have been remember that this is Ben's fantasy. Although there are a lot of gorgeous women (models) shopping at the same time, the way there body looks is his fantasy. It would be even weirder if he had a fantasy with them being heavier or if they had something else that would turn most men off.

reply

yeah, definitely, I was just about to say that. i mean, we're talking about an insomniac artist who thinks he can stop time here. there's a possibility that he may have imagined them or just perceived them that way

reply

lol by my experience the only movies that show tons of boobs are terrible b horror movies. and there's nothing wrong with it, but they don't need to make up like 30% of the movie. just my opinion, though.

reply

Actually the way the breasts were shown in this movie were absolutely lovely. I wasn't aroused as much as I was actually looking into the female form, analyzing every aspect of a female's body. Then again, I am a guy and my first female body experience was very similar to the main characters.

reply

yea, its like over indulgent action movies, its cheap thrills. im a guy and those girls were all attractive, but they only really needed to show one girl naked to get the point across. theres a line when things become a bit excessive, and its nothing to do with bein prude or anything, its just a basic thing. its like a page of a book that has the same word 5 times and you think, they really used that word too often. well i think that happened with that scene for me.

reply

I think what sets this film apart is that the scenes where they do show boobs or any nudity whatsoever isn't simply for a T and A aspect. It's not like Sean Ellis did it because he wanted to show boobs or pump up the sex appeal so people would see it. I genuinely believe that it' more of an appreciation of the female body: the curves, softness. If you take it to the extremes, it's almost like an ode to the female form. I didn't feel offended by it or threatened, nor did I think Ben was being a total perv because there's something that's calm and non-threatening about Ben (and that's speaking from a woman's perspective), although I do agree, it may seem unlikely that "7 supermodel chicks" would just randomly be there. But I think there are a lot of beautiful women in the UK and the possibility at least does exist, and hell why not, right?

As for the contradiction of beauty, whereas I have yet to see th 2006 film, I saw the short, and I think if anything it's not so much a contradiction but something very endearing or at least a clever contrast. At least you know Ben isn't totally in it for looks or sex. Personally I can't think of a better way at least from Sean Ellis' perspective how to show that Ben has true interest in Sharon. I suppose you could add the fact that they are friends and those girls in the supermarket could be random, he may not even know them and I suppose that allows him to distance himself and it makes it easier because he doesn't know them. I think what could be a bigger issue is that based on the women he chose to be nude could give off a very prejudiced view of beauty, instead of the fact that there are a lot of boobs. Nudity I don't mind as long as it has purpose, and I think that it does in Cashback: the female form is beautiful (at least according to Ben)

And as far as boobage in a movie goes, I don't know if Beerfest had as many scenes that showed breasts or female nudity, but I remember after having seen it thinking, "Dude... there were a lot of tits in that movie...". I could be wrong, hahaha, and I probably am. Not to say it was a terrible movie, but amusing and it did make me laugh at the very least.

reply

I didn't mind the breasts and I'm a woman too. Still thought it was a stunning film. I loved every second of it. But perhaps that's because I can find beauty in every curve, every line. ;)

In heaven, all interesting people are missing - Nietzsche

reply

It was pretty pointless, but the director seems to regard is as a momentous thing.

The thing is the female body is indeed beautiful, but this teenager, aswell as most people can not see this beauty without mixing it with lust.
In fact this mixing already happens before seeing the female form, making them mistake, and or masking, their lust with an "artistic appreciation".

Moreover we are dealing here with a mind (of the main character and possibly the director (?)) so simple that it is still questioning the definition of love and mourns (for an extent of time much too long) his "loss" of a girlfriend of two years standing (laugh!).


"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamed of in your philosophy."

reply

No such thing as too many boobs. It is truly the chepeast special effect.

reply

Those that felt it was over-mammaried could always ask for their....cashback

Alternatively you could make a riposte with a serious amount of co*k in it - maybe 5 dudes shopping in krispy kreme with hard-ons at 6'am - you could even call it MOURNING GLORIA - it's a horror movie about a woman with a phobia for pen*ses but who cannot stop seeing them wherever she turns. Every object in the film will have some phallic aspect.

I dunno, since watching SHORT BUS and THE WAYWARD CLOUD all nekkidness seems kind of done already.

Ultimately is Sean Ellis someone with something to say or someone who knows how to make something look strong. If you ask me the twenty minute short was wonderful, the tacked on guff to make it a full feature was contrived and all in all this dude is all fart and no pooh. Dali describes women's beauty residing in the secrets they hold within them and it would be hard to argue that Anita Ekberg would look as great in the fountain with the dress off - but Ellis' intention was never to make high art but to make something that felt hip and looked like it might be meaningful so that teenagers would adopt it as their own.

BATTLE IN HEAVEN does much the same and both movies benefitted from a magnificent rack on the front. If you think these movies were brilliant then you're the kind of person who doesn't have porn but does have "erotica".

Personally i got more sheer joy out of the seconds of out-takes in CINEMA PARADISO than all of the norks put together in CASHBACK.

Ellis has also been a total wally in every interview he's had so far - maybe he's been misquoted.

This weekend I am watching Death Note 1 & 2, Four Eyed Monsters, Train Man, Nerdcore Rising (if I get sent the cut) and We Are The Strange - now if was a teenager all over again that's the *beep* I'd be getting into - at least it's original.

K Bye

reply

There are never too much boobs...for a guy anyway LOL. But even in this flick, the boob footage was beautifully filmed and artist.

Lex
:: CHAOS THEORY ::
http://www.chaostheoryband.com/

reply

maybe a woman sees this movie as having too many boobs, but im an art student too, and when your an art student you do appreciate things more than you normally would, whether its the complexity of a reflection off a shiny car or a womans boobs... I think the nudity in this movie definitely had a rightful place, and it was also just a great excuse to show a lot of boobs, so im not complaining.

and you cant fault them for putting so many hot chicks in one supermarket, i mean would you really wanna stare at nothing but saggy disgusting looking boobs if you didnt have to?

reply