Should this goof be deleted?
The goof, as it is written:
When Stranz picks up the phone and its Jimmy he says "It's MacElroy" but right after he says that Fairchild turns to Katie and then Stranz says "for her," pointing to Katie.
What I see when watching the movie:
The full line of dialogue from the movie is "Uh, hi, it's Jimmy MacElroy. Is Katie there?" Stranz looks at Fairchild, then at Katie, and says "It's MacElroy," still looking at Katie. Fairchild spins to face Katie, and then Stranz says "For her."
So, is this a goof or not? The user who added the goof assumes that since Fairchild spins before Stranz says "For her," that the actress jumped the gun on the motion.
However, could it be argued that the character followed Stranz's eye motions, and she could tell that the call was for Katie?
If you agree with my interpretation, should the goof be deleted, or changed to "Incorrectly regarded as a goof"?