MovieChat Forums > The Sentinel (2006) Discussion > What was the purpose of Eva Longoria's c...

What was the purpose of Eva Longoria's character?


She had barely any dialog, and no importance to the plot. Was she only there to draw young teenage boys?


"Ah, Hon. Ya got Arby's all over me."
The artist formerly known as ispy71290

reply

LOL Yes. I guess they thought the movie needed some more estrogen as if Basinger wasn't enough.

reply

basinger is too old to bring in young boys,
but i find the constant commentary throughout the movie about how hot she is to be annoying and a bit below a good thriller/action movie's standards

http://www.coprophagor.com/flatmar.htm

reply

[deleted]

kim's still gorguess alright, try renting the getawat with her and alec baldwin, they have sum steamy scenes, thatll remind you how hot she still is.

reply

you're asking us to rent a movie from something like 13 years ago to remind how hot basinger is in 2009?
illogical


http://www.last.fm/music/Disuse

reply

[deleted]

Haha... i think so too... my gf only wanted to watch the movie when she saw eva was in it.. a housewives fan i might add. But i think she was in it for the male/teenage audience and for the Boys in Blue to admire and sexually harrase ;)

typical


"... watch a movie once but watch a good movie twice"

reply

Anyone notice this is the second time Eva's butt has been focused on by the camera. I noticed that "camera shot" in "Harsh Times".

Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. (Dr Strangelove)

reply

You guys are so mean.Eva sweerie, you rock

reply

What was the purpose of Eva Longoria's character?

She looks pretty.

reply

if it wasn't for jill who was friends pete a lot of stuff wouldnt get done seeing as david thought pete slept with his wife.

thus a reason for eva.

reply

Not really, as the president's wife would've spilled the beans to David anyway. Her character was introduced like it would have a major role, but in the end it was a nothing part.

I thought they'd be a twist in the film and she would be part of that - would've made it better

reply

[deleted]

Basinger still looks good considering her age...

and yeah Longoria looked pretty good in that suit...

reply

Well, I'm 19, technically a teenager lol, but I watched the film because the previews had Douglas being the perceived bad guy, I wanted to see how things would turn out...even though I knew it would end the same as all the others ( guy clears name, everything goes swell ). Eva was pretty damn hot in the previews too, however, I should add that I watched the film on my flight back home to Toronto from Calgary, and the only other two choices were 8 Below and Ice Age......soooo...

I was dissapointed there was no Eva nude scene though. I though that would have been the point of her being in the movie.

reply

i think Eva considers herself too big of a star now to do nudity roles...

usually its begining no name actresses who do alot of nudity... or some good ones who just like showing off like Angelina JOlie, Charlize Theron, Halle Barry and Nicole Kidman...

reply

[deleted]

i think Eva considers herself too big of a star now to do nudity roles... and also to have any dialog ? yeb when you are such a star you only have to show up :P

reply

There was no point. I would have killed her off.

every film has a begining, middle and an end, but not always in that order

reply

Yes, the movie would have been better if she'd been picked off by a sniper or something. She didn't add much to the movie (if anything) and I found her annoying after her second appearance.

reply

she's attractive...

reply

I think she was needed to be the neutral ground between douglas and kiefer. But iys 100% true about what you said about ehr being introduced like a main charcter. But suppose she had to be to be shown on the adverts. Kim Basinger was for the middle-aged men and Eva for the younger age group. It sells donit.

reply

[deleted]

maybe she was eye candy for the teenage boys going to see the movie?

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

That was my response. Especially after the comment about her attire when she first meets Keifer's character.

reply

[deleted]

basinger looked hotter than eva, sorry. sad but true. basinger is just absolutly amazing, everyone should see her in cellular. eva's role definetly was a nothing role but oh well, the bigger ones will come.

reply

Yeh I cannot understand why she was even in this film. If she’s going to be in a movie is has to be because of her looks, and this movie was not for that. She was forced to show her rather lacking acting abilities rather than show off her looks.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

I found her character to be offensive and faintly disturbing. It seemed to be as if she was just there because she's perceived to be "hot". She can't act and she was woefully miscast. What's up with Hollywood that in thrillers there always has to be a "little woman"? At least Kim Basinger's character managed to redeem females.




"I never knew magic crazy as this"

reply

To me she was there to link the two main characters and to show that Douglas' was a good guy since he recommended Kierfers as a good guy to learn from

reply

I'd go one step beyond that, what was the purpose of the whole film?

reply

[deleted]

"I'd go one step beyond that, what was the purpose of the whole film?"


To entertain. Did a fair job. Not unforgettable though.

reply

"Perceived"? You must have been *beep* lobotomized at birth - Eva Longoria is freaking ravishing.

Hama cheez ba-Beer behtar meshawad!

reply