OK, so I liked this movie quite a lot. It was funny, clever and fresh. I actually even liked the mockumentary better than the last 30 minutes, and it's probably because I seriously disliked the actual deaths at the end.
They were really fun and unpredictable, sure, but just really disappointing, and quite boring. I mean, come on - Kelli dies just by falling from the window!? Oh please! They were also too quick and quite dry, and I didn't really like that.
Other than that, I really dug this. It's just that the actual deaths disappointed me, and I was expecting them to be a lot more entertaining and brutal. But ignoring that, it's a great movie.
Agreed. I don't think that gore makes a movie (i hate movies like Saw III) but I was expecting this it be more modern and gritty then what it was. Although the documentery parts felt modern when ever it went to events taking place off the film crews camera the movie turned into a cheesy 80's movie with dry deaths. I understand thats the whole point of the movie but I couldn't help but feel a little disapointed.
Extra gore is always nice, and I wondered about the lack of hardcore gore near the end myself when I first watched this. My only guess is that they left things fairly mild because it might have been seen as too drastic a change from its light-hearted style.
I loved Kelli's death. It was a total anticlimax and it made me laugh how they expected her to live and all that and she just falls out the window and dies.
generally in a slasher, we don't know how the people are going to die, what's going to happen to them, or the events that will lead up to their deaths, which is what can (sometimes) make these movies so suspensful and shocking, etc.
in this movie, we know what's going to happen to almost everyone before it happens because leslie takes us through the evening. and he does say at some point in the movie that things have to be quick because there's a lot of people running around that he has to take care of (or something like that), so i wasn't at all disappointed with the deaths. we got what we were told we were going to get. we couldn't see him slaughter the humping couple because we had to see taylor's reaction to what was happening, we couldn't see the guy get it in the cellar (though we do see it when leslie is telling us about it) because more important things were going on upstairs, and kelli's death was awesome, in my opinion.
earlier, when asked about people smashing out winows, leslie says, "you'd be surprised", which i took to mean that hardly anyone does it. he then says if they do it on the second floor, they're left on the roof which leaves them screwed. kelli busting out the window and jumping had me laughing like hell. in my mind, she wasn't going to die until leslie got her, even after i knew she wasn't a virgin. jumping out a window and dying? in three seconds flat? i figured she'd be one of the last people to be offed. poor leslie never got to wreak havoc on her (imagine what he would've done to her knowing she wasn't a virgin, eh?). she showed some survivor girl instincts by smashing the window, but proved to be nothing more than a 'sexually active "victim" (or whatever) by falling out and biting it.
as for the gore, i love it. but i don't think all movies need it. remember, there was barely any gore in halloween, friday the 13th, nightmare on elm street, etc, back in the day. i actually think it was a smart move on the part of the film makers to tone the gore down in this one. we still like leslie at the end. we might not if we'd seen intestines and brutal, BRUTAL deaths.
If you want gore with your comedy see Slither, Hatchet, or Grindhouse. All three deliver the red stuff and Hatchet has three of the best death sequences ever shot on film. Behind the Mask is all about it's sharp wit and dissection of the sub-genre. Gratuitous gore in the final act would have not worked. I agree that the filmmakers knew what they were doing by keeping the focus on the characters and not trying to turn it into a movie that it wasn't. Leslie Vernon is great!
Nightmare On Elm Street did in fact have very little gore. There were only two scenes that I can recall. One is the first girl to die, in the bedroom when she's clawed up and sent to the ceiling, and the other is Depp's death. However, Depp's death was nothing but blood shooting to the ceiling, you never see a body and it doesn't really count as gore in my opinion.
Friday the 13th only had one scene that I remember, and that was Kevin Bacon's character.
Child's Play had no real gore, either.
Halloween had the scene with a young Michael killing his sister, but that was all.
Ironic, really, how goreific horror films have become when the pioneers to them really never utilized much violence. The only one that did that I can recall was Hellraiser, but that isn't a slasher.
You want gory slashers go watch Italian horror; American ones tend to never utilize much gore.
This movie came on in the middle of the night when I was going through a "waking up in the wee hours and not being able to go back to sleep for a few hours" phase. I was able to watch most of the film in a pretty "alert and aware" state, but was starting to get a bit sleepy toward the end. I think I might, however, have seen him take out someone's heart and hand it to them ? That image kind of shook me up, personally, but I guess everybody has their own idea of what makes something "horrifying".
The whole thing is a horror/horror satire. If you found the deaths odd or kelly dying early on then you kind of missed what they were going for a little bit.
The whole point that Kelly died in such a stupid fashion not only was supposed to be kind of funny. the whole fact that she wasn't a virgin, passed out when she first saw Leslie, etc. hinted to the fact she wasn't the true heroine and her death was supposed to kind of make you laugh and say "Oh she's not anything like he thought she was" and start to give you an idea that she wasn't the true survivor girl.
They did a good job with it as it was more of a horror/comedy/satire so they didn't want the deaths to be too gruesome.
There's already a bit of disconnect when it goes from the documentary style to horror flick because you know leslie and kind of think he's an okay guy other than the whole murdering thing.
Other than that he has a normal life going on and seems to be an okay guy and so when the killing starts it would jar the average viewer too much to go from that to some truly gory killings.
I agree with the people saying that gore wouldn't have fit in this movie. Matter a fact I think the post digger scene was too much to fit in. I don't really have anything against gore, even though I do think it's mostly lame, regardless if it's in comedies or horror. To me the whole point of the movie was just realism, which made in funny when it was applied to the most outrageous genre. Was Kelly really supposed to be the survivor? I thaught this was just what Leslie had planned and Taylor was supposed to be it all along, if Kelly really was to be his girl and thing went down like that Leslie would have broken apart imo, he was way to unstable and too much of a perfectionist to just have his enitre plan go down the crapper and him just going along and adapting to it like that.
Got to agree with John here. To be honest, I think slasher flicks are really lame, and saw this movie on a recommendation. If it was particularly gory at the end, it would've been just as cheesy as 95% of all the other slashers out there.