Of course as a woman, I wonder why, without judging him, of course. He is a truly unique individual worthy of deep respect. But I can't help but wonder if there were some hurt or loss or rejection in his life that caused him to leave "civilization" so thoroughly and go to such a remote place --- remote in terms of human contact, more than geography? While he showed great respect for animals, he didn't seem to have any emotional connection to them as others did. He shared the wilderness with them and went his way while they went theirs. I've seen documentaries where men and their women and even children establish homes in very remote and challenging places, and their lives seem incalculably richer to me, with the companionship, the sharing and affection. He does not seem to feel a need for that, and so I'm curious.
I'm sure he's had some heartbreak in his life(who hasn't?), However I do not think the decision to do what he did came as the result of that. He stated in the second part of the series that, "life on Twin Lakes was so uncomplicated", to some men that is all that is required for fulfillment.
The "emotional connection" to the animals, as compared to others I do not understand your statement, what others?(as in other documentaries, etc., not others in this film) As far as "companionship, sharing and affection" making ones life richer...well that all depends on the person. Some people need other people around them to be content, while some men do not require human contact to be content. _____________________________________________________________________________ Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading.-T.Jefferson
"While he showed great respect for animals, he didn't seem to have any emotional connection to them as others did."
The answer is in the difference between the modern anti-industrial Green mentality and the robust frontiersman that Proenneke exemplified. He respected nature and its beauty, but he also knew that nature was cruel and capricious, and you had to guard against it with intelligence and skill. He was under no silly illusions as so many closeted urban environmentalists are, spouting about how precious and fragile nature is while living in electrified homes and getting around effortlessly in their gas-powered vehicles.
In Part II of AITW he outlines his individualist philosophy, recognising that while co-operative effort can be a wonderful thing, self-reliance is the prime mover. That is, individual intelligence comes before collective action. Proenneke knew the score.
Lots of companies have a corporate mindset of everyone cooperating to crank out a product, but the nation, and indeed civilization itself, was mostly built through individual efforts to accomplish things. How many products were created by a group of minds that were huge failures or required a recall? Compare that to inventions or social observations by a single mind.
Sexist comment coming; I tend to find that women have a predilection for a failure to understand man's understanding and knowledge that nature, of which the wilderness is an extension, is cold and impersonal though filled with all kinds of wonders. You don't need friends. I know that sounds heretical, but you really don't. If you're satisfied with who you are, as was Proeneke, then you can meet and leave people as you please, and experience nature in its raw as you please.
To become even more high minded here it's basic philosophy that you have your own set of values. They are not dependent upon what others think.
And I think that's why females tend not to get males, because the female tends to be seeking for approval as part of her basic programming of finding a good mate for her security and that of her offspring.
You bring up a very good point. Men, when stripped to their primal core, tend to live by three words: Provide, protect and procreate. The first two are often perceived by society to mean with others, or for others "provide for your family" "protect your wife". But any man thinking it through will realize that it's not necessarily true at all to have that apply to others or companionship. A part of our DNA is to provide and protect ourselves first.
Procreation, obviously cannot be done without a mate. But it's also not needed on a day to day basis for survival. Only over the course of a lifetime. Proenneke obviously wasn't intending on spending his entire life alone out in the wilderness. No man would.
I totally can relate, because people they exhaust me, of course I don't have the skills to do something like he did so i'll be miserable and bitter until I die.
Newsflash: Not everyone thinks/believes as you. There's nothing wrong with someone for holding a differing viewpoint and there's nothing wrong with someone who seeks isolation. He was mentally sound and didn't have a medical condition.