MovieChat Forums > The Aristocrats (2005) Discussion > WHAT WAS THIS???

WHAT WAS THIS???

posted 17 years ago by suicideking666
17 replies | jump to latest

... just one thing.... why would you make a movie out of a joke that it
isn't even funny???? ...... I was lucky that i catched this movie on
HBO, watched for a while then just turned to another channel....

I really thought the whole movie was a joke, a fake documentary. But i
guess not! . IT'S A JUST A DOCUMENTARY THAT TALKS THE WHOLE TIME ABOUT
A BAD JOKE!! how good could that be??? ... just avoid it if you can. Or
if you catch it on TV, just watch it for a couple of minutes and then
go for another thing.

[–] snagglepuss_62629 17 years ago

Ah, Well...........to each their own............

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

[–] danielhegder 17 years ago

That's kind of the point. They talk about how it's a bad joke in the movie. Maybe you didn't catched that bit.

[–] RT Firefly 16 years ago

Folks, if someone with 666 as a moniker doesn't like this film, how bad must it be? You have been warned

[–] snagglepuss_62629 14 years ago

"Folks, if someone with 666 as a moniker doesn't like this film, how bad must it be?"

I have "666" in my phone number ("Satan On Speed Dial", my friends call it), and I think that "The Aristocrats" is hilarious. RT's criteria are still just as stupid and pointless as ever...

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

[–] RT Firefly 14 years ago

You fans of this movie never disappoint. My comment would suggest that someone with 666 associated with their name would be expected to like this retarded piece of gibberish, Snagglepuss. Also, you call my quip suggesting even Satan hates the Aristocrats "criteria"? It figures a fan of this piece of crap couldn't tell the difference between sarcasm and reality.

[–] snagglepuss_62629 14 years ago

Or...Your post could be interpreted as "If somebody with 666 in their name likes this movie, then it must be GREAT!!!"

You really don't think before you post, do you? Don't blame the readers who are baffled by your screeds, when it's your own poor writing doesn't make any sense.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

[–] RT Firefly 14 years ago

on Wed Feb 2 2011 09:14:26 snagglepuss_62629 wrote:

"You really don't think before you post, do you? Don't blame the readers who are baffled by your screeds, when it's your own poor writing doesn't make any sense."

lol... nuff said.

btw, thanks for the bump.

[–] simpsonsfan62 16 years ago

Everybody seems to be missing the point of this film entirely. And I don't get it. Why make a movie about so many people telling the same joke? It's not about the joke. It's about the people. The point of the movie isn't about the joke itself, but about revealing the character of the people telling the joke. The review from the guy who says he is tired of hearing everyone give their explanation of the joke is a perfect example of missing the point of this film. The joke means different things to different people; the joke has not core meaning. What you learn from watching this movie is the psyche of the comedians. This movie gives you a better glimpse into their personality than all their standup routines combined. Or, at least, it attempts to.

[–] CeeCeeCooper 16 years ago

It was so tedious, boring, and really really not funny.

http://chismetime.com/2009/03/la-coacha-interviews-britney-spear/

[–] namaGemo 14 years ago

No 5hit. And listen to all the pretentious phonies saying it was deep, and about the art and the artists. Give me a break.

[–] weird_beard 11 years ago

So, does that mean that you agree that it reveals the character of the people telling the joke?

[–] 11 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 11 years ago

[deleted]

[–] sean1234 16 years ago

I'm ashamed of how much I like it. Honestly.

A homosexual with power... that's scary.

[–] RT Firefly 16 years ago

Sean - Like what?

[–] sean1234 16 years ago

the movie. lol

A homosexual with power... that's scary.

[–] RT Firefly 15 years ago

... is lame