No Razzies?


I don't care all that much about the Razzies, sometimes I agree with them and sometimes their nominations baffle me. But what really baffles me, especially given their history, is the fact that they didn't nominate this movie for a single award. It's especially mystifying considering there's a category for "Worst Remake or Sequel", which you would think it would at least be nominated for. Considering it's status among worst reviewed films (No. 66 on Rotten Tomatoes 100 Worst and 4% Fresh Rating) you would think it would have been nominated. Now I realize some like it, to each their own, but given the overall reaction, it seems like a very strange oversight. Did they think it was too bad to even bother razzing it? Did they not want to risk Selma Blair showing up to accept the "award"? Did somebody involved with the awards produce the movie? I just found it odd that, even with such a spot-on category along with others, it didn't get a single nomination. Normally they have a field day with a movie like this, but maybe it was just too easy. That doesn't stop them talking about Gigli and Battlefield Earth all the time though.

"See you guys at the 10 year prison reunion" - Ben Richards

reply