Seagal - one of the greatest actors of all time
I dont know why Seagal constantly gets critcised for being bad at acting, just watch his performance in this movie, he could show De Niro and Pacino a thing or two.
shareI dont know why Seagal constantly gets critcised for being bad at acting, just watch his performance in this movie, he could show De Niro and Pacino a thing or two.
shareThe only thing he can do well is kick some serious butt. He is no actor. He and Van Dam should hook up. They both share the same qualities.
shareVan Damme and Segal hooking up is money in the bank. That could even be a big screen film if they fight each other. Van Damme is capable of some good acting, check out "Wake of Death" and "Hard target". It's all about the director. Segal is the same all the time which is fine if his movies were good. Van Damme has somehow managed not to turn out so many stinkers.
-Mav
The only thing he could show De Niro is how to wear a thousand dollar suit and still make himself look like an over-sized ape. Oh yeah, and how to speak like an eighty-year-old on a respiratory device.
Go to the loo, 'cause all the *beep* is coming out your mouth instead of your a-hole...
For the record, I was just kidding, I dont think De Niro and Pacino will be losing out on any movie roles to Seagal any time in the near future, or ever for that matter.
shareOh yeah, I see that now. But to be honest, there are so many die-hard fans here there is no way to tell who is and isn't being serious.
Go to the loo, 'cause all the *beep* is coming out your mouth instead of your a-hole...
He is the best actor ever!! Watch On Deadly Ground for a Taste of his greatest acting!!!!!! He is god
shareHe likes to act like God in his movies too. Like nothing can ever touch him. Gets a little tedious. If On Deadly Ground's the one with Michael Cain, then I have seen it, and I did in fact really enjoy it.
Go to the loo, 'cause all the *beep* is coming out your mouth instead of your a-hole...
This film is actually not that bad compared to Black Dawn & Submerged. The acting by the whole cast, including Seagal, is terrible. However it is fairly entertaining.
shareI might rent it just to see that alone. I've heard about its direness before.
Go to the loo, 'cause all the *beep* is coming out your mouth instead of your a-hole...
How does an actor who's given a script act like he's God in a movie? I just don't get that. Isn't that portraying a fictional character. Are you dumb enough not to know the difference? you idiot.
shareOh my god, you stupid, stupid girl. The film is a vehicle for Seagal - it was written specifically with him in mind, with the intention of him crafting their film into another of his movies around him. Why the hell else would he be a producer on the movie, or any others for that matter?
Go to the loo, 'cause all the *beep* is coming out your mouth instead of your a-hole...
I have no idea what the hell you just said. That must mean I really am stupid then, huh!
shareWell you know what? I think you just might be right.
Go to the loo, 'cause all the *beep* is coming out your mouth instead of your a-hole...
For goodness sake, just how many of you are there out there? I mean people who are obsessed with toilets, people's rear ends etc. You're another one who needs to go see an Analyst, and pretty damn quick.
shareUm... that was a joke, right?
Go to the loo, 'cause all the *beep* is coming out your mouth instead of your a-hole...
[deleted]
Steven "looks like an oversize ape" eh Hazzer99, The Steven Seagal? This man is the most beautiful man on earth, always was, still is in his mid fifties. You truly are a first class moron, aren't you.
shareYou really are so *beep* stupid. Every couple of months, you randomly reply to me with an incoherent message which frankly I don't give a *beep* about. "Most beautiful man on earth"??!! You must be kidding!! I mean you have to be! He's fat and *beep* ugly. Even in Under Siege, an amazing movie for sure, he has saggy skin and a beer belly. He does look like an over sized ape in half his movies, with greasy slicked back hair in a tiny little pony tail. He has cool action movies which are good entertainment, but stop acting as if he deserves an Oscar. He can't act for *beep* other than the same role he always plays. All of his movies consist of tedious dialogue, with the audience sitting in wait for the next cool bit of action. How can you deny it when it is so widely accepted? What the hell is it with die-hard fans in utterly refusing to see reason?
Go to the loo, 'cause all the *beep* is coming out your mouth instead of your a-hole...
Steven is the most beautiful man on earth, right. get over it. And I will continue to reply to your rantings when I feel like it. You're not even good enough to mention Steven's name, let alone make insulting, personal remarks about him, just because that's how you get off. Now what are you going to do dog's breath? Stomp your feet and tear your hair out I imagine. Oh, and by the way, me incoherent? You are just dumb. By the way,I just have to ask this, but what is it with you and this constant reference to the "loo",? I keep telling you I think it's time you went to see a shrink or something about that,I really do.
shareRight, lesson One on The Internet, you *beep* retard.
IMDb allows users to create a "signature". One creates it in their profile section on the site, and it is then posted below every single one of their posts. Pretty much everybody on the site uses it apart from you, making you the dumb one, as you asked twice and I ignored you both times thinking you might work it out, but obviously my hopes were in vein.
Secondly, I actually like Seagal. I love him as an icon, in fact. Under Siege is one of my favourite films. Plenty of his movies rule, while plenty suck. But he is not the most beautiful man on earth. He's never once been voted in any kind of critically accepted rating system in magazines or the net or anything else as a particularly good looking man. He looks cool and smooth, sure. That's his look. But not beautiful. I just really am quite intrigued as to why you keep saying this.
Go to the loo, 'cause all the *beep* is coming out your mouth instead of your a-hole...
You make me laugh so much. You're a constant source of amusement for my friends and me.I could care less about opinion of me, I can answer back, so don't waste your time. Steven is a beautiful man, how many more times? And what should intrigue you even more, is this deep desire to include toilet language in your posts. Hey, has anyone ever talked to you about that? Not only do I think you are one sick dude, you might even be dangerous too.
shareI know you're not English, but I thought you might like to know that your constant miss correct use of grammar is the funniest thing in your messages. Half the time I can barely even read what you're saying and have to decode it. *beep* off onto some other board.
Go to the loo, 'cause all the *beep*'s coming out your mouth instead of your a-hole...
Have you made an appointment to see that shrink yet?
shareNope, not yet.
Go to the loo, 'cause all the *beep*'s coming out your mouth instead of your a-hole...
Actually, I've changed my mind about you needing a shrink, something much more severe and permanent is what's needed here. I won't say what that something should be, I'll let you figure it out for yourself, seeing as you're such a clever creature. That coherent enough for you? You are filthy and disgusting, but mostly very screwed up, and not worth the few drops of ink it takes to reply to you any more. You may now consider yourself non-existent, as far as I'm concerned.
shareJesus, you are really, really *beep* up. I mean seriously, you might wanna consider hitting a pillow or something. I cringe to think that you may have actually been serious all this time. What do you do with your day? Telesales? Tree hugging? Must be something weird to produce a wierdo like you.
Go to the loo, 'cause all the *beep*'s coming out your mouth instead of your a-hole...
I'd probably never compare Seagal to Pacino. DeNiro, hmm, I don't know.
Acting reverie aside, a friend of mine is a student in Cambridge aikido school, and, when I asked him about Seagal, he told me that Steven got kicked out of his school by the school master.
I thought he meant it figuratively, but he said "No, I mean, HE GOT THROWN OUT of the school by a diminutive elderly man from a second floor staircase".
A 6ft4in Steven Seagal? yeah, right.
shareSteve is the ultimate ham actor, he makes bad acting look good, also the fat *beep* couldnt puch his way out a wet paper bag without a stunt double.
shareIt is my firm belief that all of Seagal's movies are secretly funded by Ben Aflek and Keanu Reeves, to make their acting seem better by comparison.
Clever trick.
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
I've never really found flaw with Steven Seagal's acting, but I think he is interesting for many other reasons.
Why does he make the films he makes? Why does he decide that no-one can really mark him in his films?
I really liked that Orange Wednesday advert where he gets to have the last word.
Didn't Jackie Chan say "I never die in my movies"? I suppose Steven Seagal said, "No-one will remember anyone getting the better of me in any of my films. I will be unbeaten."
If someone makes a slew of films, an actor should be judged by his contribution to those films. He's just a part of a team, sometimes making a greater or lesser contribution to the whole. Somehow that doesn't appaly to Seagal. He is the film.
Here are my formulae:-
n x t = m m - o = c
where n = the precise number of Seagal fans; and t is the average price they pay for the DVD of the film; o = total costs for that film; c is the capital available to the next film in the series.
I like the guy. He is always an assured master at everything. He's always been in every agency for 30 years. He has no time for people who are not on his level of mastery. i.e. everybody else. A master at things will always take down a competent villain with a face slap. The heavier he is the easier it is for him to dispose of an opponent.
There is no such thing as a good Steven Seagal film or a bad Steven Seagal film. There is just Steven Seagal in a Steven Seagal film. It's elemental. Steven Seagal is element 43. He cannot be reduced to his compnent parts without a destructive release of energy.
The next Steven Seagal film will always be set in a country where the rent is lower than the previous one.
He can really act. He delivers his lines perfectly and his face always suits the situation. DeNiro is an accomplished actor but his thespian skills would be of no avail in a Seagal film. In fact most actors refuse to be upstaged by Seagal. Kudos to Tommy Lee Jones for trying it on. The role of Hamlet is a cakewalk compared to playing opposite Steven Seagal.