MovieChat Forums > Red Eye (2005) Discussion > not movie for her

not movie for her

posted 9 years ago by WideOpenSpace
10 replies | jump to latest

i love Rachel McAdams, shes beautiful, talented actress
but this movie is not for her :P

[–] stevenl-5 9 years ago

Don't know what you're talking about.

She was pretty good in this movie.

[–] josephdonavyn 9 years ago

I loved her here

[–] NJJoany 9 years ago

Saw it years ago & just decided to rent it. I thought it was terrific and that she was sensational. It was made 10 years ago and she was in excellent
condition as it's a very physical movie. My God, everything that can happen to her did and she was tossed around like a salad. The running all out scenes were great & that was her running. It was well worth watching it again 10 years later. I;m glad I rented it.

She is still gorgeous and has grown as an actress. She has played all different kinds of roles and that's super for her career. Shows there's nothing she can't do.

[–] JurijFedorov 9 years ago

It's so stupid that she is smiling even while she is a few seconds from being killed. Reminded me of Die Hard where Bruce Willis cracks jokes while suffering. But it worked in Die Hard.

[–] h-nyina 8 years ago

Not sure what you mean. She was great!

[–] JurijFedorov 8 years ago

I think it was in the house attack scene or there about. She crawls on the floor with the killer close to her and she smiles all the way and looks happy. She never really suffers.

[–] 8 years ago

[deleted]

[–] flowerchild-15037 8 years ago

I thought she was great. I think this movie really showed off her acting ability.

[–] DracTarashV2 (4496) 7 years ago

It’s always been one of my favorite roles of her. She does a very convincing job. Same goes for the great Cillian Murphy (he’s even better, no doubt).

[–] PaladinNJ (21587) 4 months ago

She did great in this movie.