MovieChat Forums > Lost (2004) Discussion > Out of the lineup, only Evangeline Lilly...

Out of the lineup, only Evangeline Lilly became a major star?


Hollywood just gave up on Matthew Fox, Josh Holloway, and Ian Somerhalder as leading men? Mitchell's in the Purge movies. Is Hurley still alive?

reply

Depends on how you look on it..Matthew Fox basically said he would quit unless he got some projects that interested him and would never do tv again. I think he has mostly retired by choice.. Josh Holloway did several films and Colony for 3 seasons...and I think Ian Somerhalder did Vampire Diaries for years. Others have worked pretty steadily too.

Evangeline Lilly isn't exactly "a big major star" either.
...But few people really are major stars and who cares. It doesn't always mean they are the best...just the luckiest.

But I do think all the cast was terrific on LOST.
If I could be as terrific as they were on LOST then I'd never feel like a failure..

reply

Yeah, all the cast and crew peaked with LOST anyway, so even if they still had successful careers now, nothing they would do would be anywhere near as good anyway. Plus it's always a bit weird seeing the actors in something else.

reply

Yeah, I kind of see it that way too. The acting was so well done by the principle characters that it's hard to overcome those moments in time. And physically I don't think Fox, Holloway or Lilly ever looked better either. They could be dirty and grimy with their hair unkempt and they've never looked as good.
But this isn't the first time I've seen actors peak in a certain role and never come close again. I don't consider it a failure though.
Despite its flaws it's still a great show to me.

reply

I agree, I don't consider it a failure either. I see being a part of this show as the highest honor. They should all be very proud.

TV actors not finding much work after being in a highly popular series seems to be a very common occurrence though. The stars of other shows like The Sopranos, Breaking Bad, 24, Prison Break etc all for the most part have not had much luck with other roles after their shows finished, even if they were very popular actors.

I'm not too sure why exactly that is. My guess would be that it's because we watch them for so long, far longer than we would see a movie actor in a movie role, that they completely master that role and it's hard for people to accept them as someone else. Of course that's not true though. For example Matthew Fox played an awesome character in Bone Tomahawk. It would be great to see him or the other actors again, but it would also be okay if we don't since like I said nothing will ever match their work on LOST.

reply

Dominic Monaghan's peak definitely came before LOST with the LOTR movies. He would have been the most recognisable actor going into the show at that time.

reply

I saw Daniel Dae Kim (pre Lost) on Voyager, which caught me by surprise. I didn't remember ever seeing this episode, not that DDK would have stood out at the time. I don't even know who Lilly is, other than seeing the show and her name on this thread. I figured Terry O'Quinn was the most recognizable of the group, but he's not exactly box office catnip. Naveen Andrews I think I've seen again, but without much fanfare.

reply

Yeah I guess so. Not sure I would say star though. More like the only one to sell out and do shitty MCU movies. I don't know how prevalent her character is in those though. But she was great in the Hobbit movies, and Real Steel was okay.

Maggie Grace used to be a bit of a star I guess, with the Taken movies. She is now on Fear the Walking Dead.

Elizabeth Mitchell was only in 1 of the Purge movies. Think she's done a bunch of TV shows too.

I have no idea where anyone else is lol :(

reply

Holloway and Fox could had been decent, maybe not on par with Jon Hamm. I think either one would had made an awesome Batman after Bale finished.

reply

Jon Hamm? Who said anything about Jon Hamm? Anyways, he was quite good in that Mad Men show. Good actor. Nowhere near in the same league as Holloway and Fox though.

reply

Of course, Jon Hamm is obviously in a way higher league than those two.

reply

LOL no

reply

Yeah, we can see where he is now, compared to those other two.

reply

What's that supposed to mean? Seeing someone in more things means they have more talent? What kind of dumbass logic is that?

Matthew Fox did some decent stuff post LOST but has since kind of retired from film and TV and Josh Holloway has been in a bunch of stuff but hasn't had good luck with roles.

Where have you seen Hamm anyway? I don't see him anywhere doing anything worthwhile.

reply

Jon Hamm is the best thing on TV since sliced bread was invented, are you off your rocker?

reply

Besides winning 2 golden globes for his acclaimed role and performance in Mad Men, he's been participating in movies regularly, such as Oscar nominated movies like Baby Driver and The Town, and also having guest starring roles in other semi-relevant movies such as Bridesmaids, A Single Man, Shrek, Minions, and also have guest starring roles in series such as Archer, Bob's Burgers, Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt, Parks and Recreation, 30 Rock.

He also had the starring role in one of the most well liked Black Mirror episodes, and is regularly working, such as recently Tag and Bad Times at El Royale movies.

Matthew Fox had a couple of movies also at his time, which were all flops (Alex Cross, Vantage Point), and that's basically it. Holloway went back to TV and has been completely under the radar.

reply

Point being? Being in more things doesn't make you more talented, dumbass. And winning "golden globes" doesn't either.

I already know and have stated that Fox and Holloway haven't been in much or had luck with roles. That's got nothing to do with acting talent. It's okay them not being in anything any more. Their best work is behind them. There will likely never be a show as good as LOST again.

reply

There are hundreds of shows far better than Lost. No one will watch Lost "for the first time" in the coming years, because they know beforehand that is a show that will lead nowhere and the writers made it all up as they went along, not knowing how to end.

reply

Oh wow, you're one of those gullible morons. It's sad that your type is still around over 9 years after the show ended. Tell me, have you even seen the show? I want to know if you are one of the idiots who saw the full show, but just didn't understand the ending or if you never watched it at all and just heard about what the idiots who saw it but misunderstood it were complaining about and mistook is as fact?

reply

I saw the show since the very beginning and was even online reading theories and defending the show from people who were saying the writers didn't know what they were doing. Until on third or fourth season I realized myself that all episodes were ending on stupid cliffhangers that were never going to be addressed again, or be relevant again, and that the writers clearly didn't have a plan on what they were doing. Characters were ending and leaving the series randomly, for getting caught driving under the influence they would be killed from the series, or from getting another job they would be killed.

At that point I continued watching just to see where it went, and it went where everyone expected: nowhere.

reply

It sure sounds like you haven't seen the show then. Late season 3 is when the showrunners negotiated with ABC and got their end date. From then on they started mapping out their end goal. So it makes no sense you saying that it is season 3 or 4 where they started bringing up things that were never addressed or were irrelevant, when it was almost the exact opposite.

And characters leaving the series randomly and from DUI's etc was literally ONLY in like seasons 2 and 3, dumbass. Libby, Ana Lucia, Eko. And Walt due to his aging.

The only person who "randomly" left during seasons 4-6 was Claire, who took a year off because the actress Emilie de Ravin wanted to do movies or something. And it was fine, because she was a secondary character and was not very important to the endgame.

You don't know what you're talking about. So shut up and rewatch the show.

reply

There were no questions left unanswered in the show, but a lot of them were answered in tricky ways, you really have ot pay attention. Reading the lost wiki helps.

There really is just 1 thing that they did not explain: where did Mother come from, what is her story? Her origin? That is what I'd like to know.

reply

The one that often creeps up that makes me laugh is "why was there a dead polar bear in the desert, they never answered that"

If you actually took notice the show did answer it gradually through the seasons. From season 3.

It's like they want someone to pop up on screen, speak into the camera giving them a full answer on the polar bear in the desert.

reply

The polar bear was explicitly answered, I liked the explanation they gave.

reply

The characters were held in bear cages season 3, turn the wheel and get the food.

Many other things after that explain the use of polar bears by Dharma.

And the question about the polar bears still gets asked.

reply

They ended almost every episode with something random, just to create a cliffhanger. And then it would either never be addressed again, or it would be addressed the next season just with a casual "oh, that thing? Nevermind about that, it wasn't anything special, it was just us goofing around".

reply

Ummm yes....🙄🙄

reply

Lol what would you know? Stick to your MCU, kid.

reply

Jorge Garcia and Daniel Dae Kim were on Hawaii Five-0 which is very popular and Kim is now producing The Good Doctor.

reply

Daniel Dae Kim had a long run on Hawaii 5-O that started immediately after Lost ended.
Michael Emerson also did another CBS detective show for many season after Lost.

Harold Perrineau always seems to be popping up in random places.

Henry Ian Cusick did the first season of Scandal and is currently doing The 100

Hurley was barely an actor before Lost, so I guess any role he gets after is playing with house money.

reply

Hurley was barely an actor before Lost, so I guess any role he gets after is playing with house money.
What are you on about?

reply

More like what are you on about? He is right, Jorge Garcia was known for an episode of Curb your enthusiasm before Lost, he was a nobody.

reply

most still get work consistently, Evangeline never wanted to be a star, i thought she basically took a break in her prime age wise for Hollywood, when she decided to act again in bigger movies she was old by Hollywood standards for women, and she is not good enough actor to be anything wife or mom in films soon when she won't do action in a few years

reply

Daniel Dae Kim is a producer on The Good Doctor and will also soon have a role on that show.

reply

She's been in like 8 movies. She's no major star.

reply

Maybe not but are any of them major stars? She has had the most prominent post-Lost film career though...

reply

None of them are.

reply

Out of the three, I only feel sorry for Sawyer.
Matthew Fox has done some terrible movies like Vanity point and Alex Cross. What a mess, does he not read the scripts before taking a role? Maybe TV shows was the best place to utilize his acting skills because movies are very short in comparison and not every actor can shine in both formats.

reply