Delahunt's status


Delahunt was a mole for the Boston City PD. Costigan was a mole for the Massachusetts State PD. That's why there was confusion. Pay attention.

reply

Not that I'm disagreeing with you, but what are you basing that on.

reply

They refer to one group (Queenan, Dignam, etc) as the 'staties' throughout the movie. When the report is broadcast, Delahunt is specifically identified as a Boston City Police officer. Jimmy Bags as well, identified by Queenan as an undercover for the Boston PD. Sullivan also makes the distinction known at least once when he calls himself an agent of the Commonwealth (State) in Suffolk County (Boston's jurisdiction).

reply

[deleted]

The report says he is BCPO but then Costello stated that was a lie to have think the mole was dead. So that would explain (not that I believe it) why the report called him a cop. When does Queenan identify Bags as an undercover? Is the report the only thing you are going on that makes you think he is a cop?

User Error Please Try Again

reply

"That guy Jimmy Bags whose teeth you knocked out just happens to be working undercover for the Boston Police department."

reply

He may say "whose jaw you broke", either way it is definitely stated that Bags is a cop.

reply

i missed that - just re-watched - good call. It was Dignam who said it with Queenan right there.

User Error Please Try Again

reply

Delahunt was not a cop. That was a story that SIU leaked to the press to try to fool Costello into thinking the rat was killed, in the hopes that would take any suspicion away from Costigan as the rat.

He helped throw a police captain off a roof and got into a shootout with the state police. I don't think an undercover cop would do those things.

reply

To be the devil's advocate - We don't see him throw him off the roof - he could have left to look for the informant (Costigan) which was their real purpose for being there. He might not have expected them to kill him - even Fitzy says they went too far. Costigan (as an undercover cop) also did many things police departments would not allow such as beating the crap out of people. I also have never heard of a police department ever claiming a known mobster was a cop. Why would they think Costello felt there was only one cop mole - that would be very risky for him and the department would know that or should know that.

User Error Please Try Again

reply

First off, you didn't answer the part about him getting into a shootout with other cops. Would an undercover cop fire his gun at other cops? I don't think so.

And yes, undercover cops take certain liberties in order to "play the part" so to speak, but I don't think firing a gun at cops is one of them. Beating up scumbags is not the same as shooting at other cops, so that's a poor argument.

reply

Would an undercover cop fire his gun at other cops? I don't think so.


How did he know they were cops? They were undercover and could have been a rival gang. He could have just been protecting himself from being shot from other criminals as far as he knew. They in no way shape or form identified themselves as police - they were unmarked - their shields weren't displayed, etc - so why the heck would he assume that the people who were shooting at them (before they ever pointed a gun at them) would be cops. It was all happened in a split second and he could have just been reacting to gun fire. So - I do think so - that an undercover would shoot at other cops when he doesn't know they are cops and they started shooting first without being threatened and without any identifiable signs of being a cop. In fact - they shot Delahunt square in the chest first - and he didn't even raise his gun - he just turned around to get in the van. If anything - you should be asking - how could undercover cops shoot at someone when they didn't have to - if they would have identified themselves - he could have put his shotgun down and it might not have been a shoot out. They started the shootout - Delahunt might not have even saw who they were - as soon as he turns - he is looking down - and he is shot. How's that for an argument?

beating up scumbags is not the same as shooting at other cops


He did a little more than beat them up - he beat them with a coat rack to the head until he was unconscioius and also shot a guy in the knee. That would not be acceptable in any police dept. undercover policy. Shooting an unarmed man in the knee as an undercover would not be allowed in any way (to put it simply).

User Error Please Try Again

reply

Also, not to be a smart ass, but because you've never heard of a police agency claiming something means it hasn't happened?

Who are you, J. Edgar Hoover?

Even Frank says, "The cops are sayin' he's a cop, so I won't look for the cop."

So no, obviously they know that Frank might not take the bait, but they had to try something to take the growing and very intense pressure now mounting on Bill.

reply

Who are you, J. Edgar Hoover?


No - but someone who has extensive knowledge of law enforcement practices (from both sides of the table). I'd be glad to hear any example of a police department knowingly declare a gangster was a cop to the media. This is a movie that obviously takes some artistic license in certain aspects - but that doesn't mean in real life it would happen. The liability alone would prevent a department from making such a claim. Delahunt could have family and friends who could now be in danger because every mobster think he was a rat cop. What would happen if they decide to take revenge on his family because he was a cop - when he actually wasn't.

Think about it - what happens when a cop gets killed in the line of duty? There would be a huge production - a huge funeral - support is sent from other jurisdictions (many times from other states across the country) - monetary support is sent for the family - etc. Do you think they are going to go through with this when he wasn't a cop? Because if they don't - it would be obvious that he wasn't a cop to every gangster.

Either way - I said and stand by - I have never heard of that happening with my extensive knowledge of the law enforcement procedures. Sure - it could have happened as (like you implied like a smart ass) I don't know everything - but through my knowledge and numerous law enforcement I have asked since this arose - in multiple jurisdictions - I/we have never once heard of it happening - but I am listening and am willing to change my stance with some specific examples.

As far as Frank - he would have said that either way. Yes - they had to try something - but this wouldn't accomplish anything. Delahunt wasn't even a trooper - which Damon would know - so he would know that there was still a trooper (Billy) in the gang. And if Damon knew it - Costello would/should know it.

User Error Please Try Again

reply

Good arguments. You did make me think a bit, but I stand by my theory, strictly as the movie goes though.

You said it yourself, it's a movie.

Good convo.

reply

agreed on the convo - perhaps it was made to be ambiguous. either way - great movie IMO

User Error Please Try Again

reply

He was a Cop. It's why he didn't give up Billy. As far as the shoot outs and stuff, he was shot first and countered by hitting a Cop in the shoulder/upper arm. He was acting in a way that any other person in fear of their Life would. He didn't throw anyone off of a roof, he wasn't directly involved in any other murder anymore than Billy.

reply

If he was a(n) UC, he never would have removed Queenan's only means of protection (his weapon) when they entered the building.

But, let's say for a moment that Delahunt thought "hmm, maybe I will take his weapon so he does not attempt to draw it and get himself shot". If this is what Delahunt was thinking then he would have never left Quennan unattended with the other criminals. He would not have walked off looking for the informant, he would have stayed and attempted to protect the police Captain.

At some point if Delahunt was truly a(n) UC, he would have broken cover and assisted a fellow officer before they threw him out of the window. The life of a police officer is more important than an operation and if it meant Delahunt and Queenan went down, then they would have both gone down fighting.

I know this is a movie and it is probably purposely ambiguous but if this was a real operation in a real setting, the cover would have been broken.

reply

If this is what Delahunt was thinking then he would have never left Quennan unattended with the other criminals.


He might not have felt they were going to kill him. As Fitzy says later - they went too far. I take that as meaning they went to far in killing him and they didn't intend on killing him in the beginning. Delahunt couldn't break cover as it would surely be a death sentence for both of them. He could have felt it was a no win situation and when he gets back he could report the murder and bring them to justice. I think the theory that an UC woud NEVER leave another cop in that situation is not a realistic one or at least it wouldn't be unrealiastic to leave.

The life of a police officer is more important than an operation and if it meant Delahunt and Queenan went down,


True - but there are situations when coming out of cover would surely have them both killed - and although it might seem romantic/heroic that they would both go out in a blaze of glory (Butch and Sundance) - it isn't always the best choice. If they both die - nobody would know who actually killed them. If Delahunt lives - he can bring them to justice.

If he wasn't a cop - why didn't he tell everyone in the van that he figured Billy was the rat (b/c he went to the right address). Why not tell them on his death bed?

Scorsese says when he was reading the script - he didn't know if he was a cop or not and still doesn't know. When he questioned why Delahunt wouldn't tell everyone that Billy was a rat - he didn't know if it was because Delahunt had a change of heart and didn't want anyone else killed or that he was in fact a cop.

With all that said - I feel that there is compelling evidence for both ways - possibly done on purpose (as you wrote). Either way - I don't think it can be definitely said he was a cop or not. If I had to choose I would say - cop - but that is today. I'm usually not this wish-washy in a debate - but I think that's because there really is no definative answer.


User Error Please Try Again

reply

True - but there are situations when coming out of cover would surely have them both killed - and although it might seem romantic/heroic that they would both go out in a blaze of glory (Butch and Sundance) - it isn't always the best choice.


I never worked undercover but I was a case officer for two operations, one of which lasted about 1.5 years and I can say that it really has nothing to do with being romantic/ heroic but more of a "it's only me and you in this room partner, we have to take care of each other" type of attitude.

In my experience, Delahunt would have never left Queenan's side for anything.

That would be like breaching a door of an armed barricaded suspect only to find your #2 guy did not follow you into the home...It would never happen.


Once again, we will never know for sure but I am just speaking from experience.

reply

I'm not saying it wouldn't happen your way - but it could easily happen the other way as well. First, Queenan didn't even know Delahunt was a cop - so it's not like they could "team up" that quickly. What is Delahunt going to do - yell he's a cop to Queenan - it would be suicide - especially since he wasn't sure he was going to be killed. They didn't care about Queenan - they cared about the rat and killing Queenan means they aren't going to get the answer from him anymore.

That would be like breaching a door of an armed barricaded suspect only to find your #2 guy did not follow you into the home...It would never happen.


Not even close to being the same. If Delahunt felt they were not going to kill him - as killing him would not do anything for their goal - he could have been buying time - thinking of plan B - possibly leaving the room to phone for back up - etc. Like I said - your scenario isn't wrong - but it isn't the only option a cop would have.

Like I wrote in previous posts - I have never heard of a police department declare a known gangster was a cop when they knew he wasn't. They would have to have an elaborate funeral with officers from all over the country coming to pay respect. They would have to make big production with people helping who are thinking they are helping a cop - because without that - what's the point - everyone would know he wasn't a cop. It would be the same production they had for Billy. Now if you want to chalk that up to artistic license - then you can same for Delahunt with the Queenan death.

I also felt (this is just a gut feeling) that Delahunt was found so quickly because Billy told them where he was because he didn't want a cop to out there buried in a swamp. Fitzy knows how to get people buried - why/how was he found so quickly?

I think we are at a point of agreeing to disagree. You some great points and it's an interesting discussion. Perhaps that is the point - to make it ambiguous.


User Error Please Try Again

reply

hey would have to have an elaborate funeral with officers from all over the country coming to pay respect.


They showed Billy's funeral with his academy photo, why didn't they show Delahunts funeral?

Why didn't Delahunt have a funeral with honors? Why did they show a mug shot photo on the news and not a photo from the academy or a photo in a suit?


[quote]Not even close to being the same. If Delahunt felt they were not going to kill him - as killing him would not do anything for their goal - he could have been buying time - thinking of plan B - possibly leaving the room to phone for back up -
[quote]

Where do you get your knowledge from? How many years have you been on the job? How many operations?

reply

Why didn't Delahunt have a funeral with honors? Why did they show a mug shot photo on the news and not a photo from the academy or a photo in a suit?


What makes you think they didn't have a funeral with honors for Delahunt? It could have happened a week after he was found.

They don't always show a academny photo - remember these were two different departments - the family could have chosen which photo to use. He was obviously UC for a while (if he was a cop) and his academy photo might not have look that close to him at his time of death. Unfortunately officers have died in my jurisdiction (too many obviously) - and they don't always have acadamy photos - they usually have do have a police photo (more up to date) but if he was undercover for so long - he might not have one.

As far as my knowledge - I don't get specific - sorry to cop out (no pun) - but it is just something I don't do - so I understand if you don't give that much credance.


User Error Please Try Again

reply

They don't always show a academny photo - remember these were two different departments - the family could have chosen which photo to use.


I seriously doubt the family would choose a mug shot photo over a photo of him in his uniform or his suit...really?

When an operation begins, a photo is taken of the officer either in uniform or in a suit. That photo is later used in court proceedings to show what the officer actually looks like versus his/her undercover counter part. This is standard protocol for UC operations.

and they don't always have acadamy photos


Again really? I worked in a med sized department of 750-780 depending on if there was a academy in session. I could go back to the 1900s and find photos of graduating police academies. Are you telling me that Boston PD doesn't have photos of graduating academy classes or photos of officers engaging in undercover operations?


As far as my knowledge - I don't get specific - sorry to cop out (no pun) - but it is just something I don't do - so I understand if you don't give that much credance.


I understand, but can you tell me if you have ANY inside law enforcement knowledge whatsoever? Any?

Never mind...I believe that if you actually had any real knowledge of law enforcement, we would not be having this conversation.

My mistake for engaging.


reply

In my jurisdiction - they never use academy photos - they use ID photos - which are more up to date and use the police uniform - not the academy uniform. They do NOT have academy photos - they keep the latest ID photo. So each department is different.

As far as how much time I have - does it matter - if you have any police instinct in you - you would know it wouldn't matter what I type. I could type anything - but I have over twenty - lets keep it at that.

So since you have this abundance of time on the job - tell me one instance when a department - yours or any other - that declared publicly to the press that a known criminal was a cop who died in the line of duty - when they knew he was a *hit head gangster.

User Error Please Try Again

reply

So since you have this abundance of time on the job - tell me one instance when a department - yours or any other - that declared publicly to the press that a known criminal was a cop who died in the line of duty - when they knew he was a *hit head gangster


I am not sure that has ever happened.

Can you tell me one instance when a department - yours or any other lost an officer in the line of duty and instead of showing an academy photo, ID photo or a suit photo, they instead showed a mug shot photo?

reply

Can you tell me one instance when a department - yours or any other lost an officer in the line of duty and instead of showing an academy photo, ID photo or a suit photo, they instead showed a mug shot photo?


The police don't determine what the press uses. Here - the news has used photos that the police would rather not have been used (not necessarily on purpose). They use the typical choir boy photos for the drug dealer - and sometimes the not so flattering photo for the cops. *I do agree that I have never seen them use a mug shot - but like other times - the police could have had a press conference - displayed all his photos - including his UC photo - and the press use which ever one they like best or is up to date (doubt he's going into the police station to update his ID card every couple years).

His mug shot - actually - is a good photo of him. He's wearing a collared shirt, he's clean shaven - well groomed - you wouldn't know that was a mug shot. It could have been a passport photo. There were no numbers, no side view - just a good photo of him. In fact - his ID photo could have looked almost the same. If he was patrol he would have had a police shirt with collar brass - but since he was a detective - a collared shirt would have been ok in many places.

My point is (which I wrote before) that there is evidence to point both ways.

User Error Please Try Again

reply

Where do you get your knowledge from? How many years have you been on the job? How many operations?


Just re-read this and it makes me come off sounding like a d!ck.

Just curious if you are on the job and how many years? I'm 30 years retired.

reply

Interesting, that could be true. When he says "why did I not tell" (or similar, can't remember exact quote) that doesn't nessesarily mean he's a cop

reply

A deleted scene shows why Delahunt didn't tell the others about Billy being the rat, and it's not because he was a cop too.

I uploaded it to YouTube a couple of years ago: https://youtu.be/f7ivCtiKWfw

Still pond / A frog jumps in / Plop!

reply

Even Scorsese says "Is Delahunt a cop? One could look at it that way"

User Error Please Try Again

reply