MovieChat Forums > War of the Worlds (2005) Discussion > I loved this movie growing up and still ...

I loved this movie growing up and still do to this day


I loved this movie growing up, it was incredibly visceral and real feeling to me throughout its presentation, how the people reacted and remained petty and aggressive toward each other through the panic and horror of the end of world; even after many viewings since I first saw it back in 2008 when I was 8. I've been so fixated on the design and personality that production crew gave to the invaders, and just how unorthodox and alien they truly are, with the use of pods coming down from lightning, the fact they were three legged and still came to life with terrifying animation and mannerisms, and the way this species had crafted their machines of harvesting and destruction and seeing the symbols and markings on them that gives the aliens a militaristic/industrialised identity, and letting the viewer relate these mass produced machine of war with similar tools of war used in our nation's military today. It's so cool to see in action and terrifying to imagine how hopeless and outmatched humanity was in that scenario. There needs to be a renaissance of writing and ideas like this, because nothing as of the past decade has enraptured me as much as this movie, Indiana Jones or even Anaconda back in 2004. one thing that makes this movie so interesting is the open endedness to the events in the movie and trying to use logic to give reasoning to the plot and mostly to the alien's tactics and way of thinking. for example you could theorise that the tripods have a sort of targeting system that automatically does math to default preferring larger groups of people for harvesting/elimination over smaller groups, as in the case with the one tripod going over the top of Ray, Robbie and Rachael on the hill. you could assume this was intentional and the tripod occupants were aware of the group, as going after the group would've have been an inefficient/potentially fruitless endeavor considering the conditions the machine would tackle doing so and the fact it was the choice between hordes of people on the docks, hillside and ferry, or a mere 3 survivors. Stuff like that is what is the soul of this movie, with it taking the curiosity and creativity of humanity of the writers commissioned to creating this movie and having the byproduct being a movie about destroying the very essence of that. It's fantastic. This movie has a lot of plot holes but the way its presented is just so cool to theorise about, and the horrifying nature and ambiguity adds to that.

reply

I like it. 7/10 in my opinion. It's got some tense moments.

reply

And now the aliens turn out to be tic tacs

reply

Nice wall of text.
And this movie is 80% shit.

reply

I was good for a watch out of curiosity, but I didn't care for it either.
Annoying kids, broken home, a lot of cliches.
Some interesting effects.
To me this is how I felt about the first remake of "The Thing" ... so what.

reply

It has a few good set pieces and moments.
The characters, story, tone, themes, all fail.

I remember Cruise and Spielberg proudly announcing how "it is not another Independence Day", as if that is a movie below them, and they knew better.
ID4 runs circles around this turd.

reply

Actually I liked this more than Independence Day, and Will Smith is even a worse actor and person than he was back then.

I like the new version of WotW with Gabriel Byrne pretty much, but it has very little to nothing to do with the actual story of WotW.

reply

It was a critical success and box office success. I loved the film. It's good except to nitpicky fannerds like you... 😂

reply

It is good only to lame-os like you that need the critical success (where????) and box office success (again, where????? as opposed to not breaking even?) to judge a movie. Transformers must be your favorite.

Let me illuminate your poor taste.
This turd is objectively, by any standards of quality, 80% shit.

reply

No .. 😂

reply

block of text,
unreadable

reply

That's the first thing I thought. The 'enter' button is one's friend when writing.

reply

Spielberg masterfully creates the illusion that the story is REAL and could possibly happen, but then blows it with sequences that destroy all credibility, like the plane crash segment: The jet crashes and destroys practically the entire neighborhood, including the house Cruise and his kids are staying at (in the basement). Yet, miraculously, their vehicle remains completely unscathed, not to mention they're able to easily drive out through the enormous amount of debris. Why Sure!

Spielberg likes to include father/son conflicts in his stories, which is fine, but he horribly fumbles the ball in this regard in "War Of the Worlds." I'm talking about the military fight on the hill sequence where Cruise's son ludicrously decides to leave his dad and sister to presumably help fight the aliens (or who knows what?). But, wait a second, he's only 15-16 years old. He doesn't know anything about military weaponry or tactics, how could he possible be of any help? The entire scene where the son insists on separating from his dad and sister is just stoo-pid and unbelievable.

reply