Workaholism: where do YOU draw the line?
There are many movies and books about workaholism, which portray workaholics as being cold, distant people who mess up their relationships due to neglect (A Christmas Carol, Devil Wears Prada come to mind).
I understand the frustration with this movie that the underlying message could somehow be interpreted as anti-capilist ie don't work hard, just do the minimum of what's required, the most important thing is to be there for your family all the time. But of course, in the real world, being a workaholic is inevitable for many people, you can't just tell your boss to go away, or not put in the hours if the work requires it.
So where do you draw the line? For me, I say no to extra work if the work environment is toxic and the extra work becomes my safety net for keeping out of trouble. If I'm not enjoying the work, if it's causing more arguments and unhappy times in my relationships, then I quit because I refuse to earn money from an employer who is causing psychological damage.
On the other hand, if I respect the employer, and I know the hard work will pay off, then I can manage my relationships while I focus on getting the work done. This doesn't apply to paid work but anything in my life that needs a lot attention eg preparing for a competition.
** spoilers ahead**
I think the underlying message in the movie is that you always have a choice. You can be on auto-pilot and shun responsibility or you can face up to it. Michael's initial success wasn't really earned; he cheated by avoiding difficult conversations and using the clicker to hear what the clients were thinking, thus avoiding failure. His adult children still adored him (such is the power of unconditional love) but his wife couldn't go on playing second fiddle to his career.
What's your thoughts? Where do you draw the line between being an honest hard worker and someone who works too hard for their own good?