No Micheal Cane?!?!?!


Really wsih they wouldve brought him back. He was such a great edition in the first one. Diedrich Bader did good though (as always).

James Webb
www.cynicalshop.com

reply

I think you mean "Michael Caine"

reply

the could have easelly chanched Diedrich Bader's character in Michael Caine's character from the first one and the movie would have been so much better!

"I think I have monogamy. I caught it from you people." - Samantha Jones

reply

Hi,
I would have been cool if they did have Michael Cane, for the second movie.

Peace,
Amanda

reply

Michael Caine and Benjamen Bratt should've been in this movie

They totally made the first movie. It's a damn shame they were cut out like that.

This film sucks

reply

why in the world would you think they would CUT Michael Caine, he was one of the funniest things about the first, he turned it down, or i think they couldnt pay him the amount he wanted, benjamin Bratt did an okay job, he was just really the pretty face of the film. The second movie didnt suck.

reply

He was asked to be in it, as was Benjamin Bratt and they both turned it down. Thus the clever omissions of their characters. Now that I've seen the movie, I can see why they wanted to distance themselves from it, it's not even one tenth as good as the original

reply

Maybe it would have been better with those two...for starters the script would have been completely different.

reply

yeah but benjamin bratt prob wouldnt of done it, i heard him and sandra bullock had quite a bad break up. michael cane would of been fab though.

reply

For some reason I didn't miss Caine as much I missed Bratt...I thought Deidrich Bader provided most of the few laughs here as Gracie's new stylist.

reply

As far as I'm concerned, Michael Caine was the funniest thing in the first one, and that he wisely avoided this disaster.

reply