1) They have a man in their custody who has murdered lots of people, so they all decide to sleep and not keep watch on him
2) Instead of running away Ben kills one of them instead?
3) Don't they have ever think to search him?
4) In all the time they had to react when Ben jumps off the horse on to the stage coach old dude and tackle him to the ground then punch him a couple of times THEN take his gun, they decided to react AFTER all this happened, Ben wasn't exactly a ninja when doing this was he?
5) I know let's deploy a decoy in the carriage which will most certainly get overrun by Ben's gang and lets give the decoy the exact details of where we're going!
6) All the good-guys are incompetent idiots who can't aim a gun at a very close target and have the reaction times of a snail.
7) The sudden change of heart from Ben at the end of the movie to betray his gang and let the farm-boy put him in prison (yes i know he was gonna escape but whatever)
8) Dan gets booted in the face so they (All with guns) let him run away and steal their horses??
How old are you? Obviously you have not seen a lot of movies. This movie was brilliant. It is about character or lack of and doing what you feel is right and accomplishing ones objective and mission.
Hilarious! Just because someone has a different view on the film they are automatically a troll? Good job for being one of the countless generic morons, devoid of even the remotest common sense, that simply label people with different opinions a troll.
Also, the script was full of flaws. Deny this and you're just an idiot.
I only think it's wrong to label someone a troll for having a different opinion, which is what LarryFellows did.
It may be harsh to have used the term 'idiot', but if you can't objectively accept the evident flaws in the script then surely something is wrong. I never said I hated the film, in fact, I quite enjoyed it (possibly just for the fact that it's a Western with two of my favourite actors), but the script was still very flawed. I do not see how any reasonable person can deny this. I think you're being a bit presumptious here, as I'm fully aware other Westerns have flaws in them, but that's not entirely relevant to the point I was making. I never said that the film was so bad and everything about it was terrible (which is how I assume you think I feel), as others here may have stated.
Frankly, it is silly to call someone a troll for having a different opinion, but in this case, I wouldn't say it is stupid to call someone an idiot if they are unable to acknowledge flaws in the script, regardless of whether or not they liked it.
In the context of this thread and the OP who was labelled a troll, I don't see him constantly trashing the film, given how this is his only thread here. And I haven't really even read many threads on here, aside from this one, so I was just pointing out that calling this particular OP a troll (and those like him who point out some reasonable flaws) isn't very smart, when there are apparently others with too much time on their hands that are more deserving of the title.
1) They have a man in their custody who has murdered lots of people, so they all decide to sleep and not keep watch on him
I can only assume you are talking about when they were in the Apache territory, Tucker the one who died was suppose to be on watch but fell asleep.
2) Instead of running away Ben kills one of them instead?
Ben killed him because Tucker was an *beep* and did everything possible to antagonize Ben: took his horse, constantly tried to order him around, and tried to keep him from sleeping. Ben didn't care about escaping he cared only about killing Tucker.
3) Don't they have ever think to search him?
He took and hid the fork that he used to kill Tucker after he was initially captured. Maybe they should've checked him before they went to sleep but I can see them just assuming he still was clean.
4) In all the time they had to react when Ben jumps off the horse on to the stage coach old dude and tackle him to the ground then punch him a couple of times THEN take his gun, they decided to react AFTER all this happened, Ben wasn't exactly a ninja when doing this was he?
The only one that was trained to do this type of duty was the guy he attacked, you can assume that the rest of them would not react as quickly as they should or even know what to do.
5) I know let's deploy a decoy in the carriage which will most certainly get overrun by Ben's gang and lets give the decoy the exact details of where we're going!
I agree but it didn't seem that they were to keen on secrecy even Byron told Ben where they were taking him.
6) All the good-guys are incompetent idiots who can't aim a gun at a very close target and have the reaction times of a snail.
Most of the good guys were doing something out of there profession: doctors, ranchers, businessman. That would account for most of them being ill prepared.
7) The sudden change of heart from Ben at the end of the movie to betray his gang and let the farm-boy put him in prison (yes i know he was gonna escape but whatever)
The change of heart didn't occur just at the end of the movie, as you stated it is shown throughout the movie Ben helps them multiple times eg: escape apaches, escape the tunneling gang, didn't kill them when he could've. The son even makes note of this at the end of the movie.
8) Dan gets booted in the face so they (All with guns) let him run away and steal their horses??
Dan was the most experienced out of all of them, Dan gets booted in the face and there is his son, a vet, and a businessman left. Ben Wade was a pretty capable guy he was the most experienced out of all of them in combat which he showed by taking care of the Apaches.
I'm sorry I think you are getting upset and I was only trying to give you another point of view. But I will respond to your statements once again and hopefully you'll be able to say that you can see some of the points as I will tell you that I see some of your good points. But I will also take the fact that all of my answers weren't noted and that you at least felt neutral or agreed with the ones left out.
1) Cuffing his hands behind his back would do nothing in your first statement if you read back you asked why did they all chose to fall asleep and I just simply pointed out that one person was suppose to be on watch. So I would agree that cuffing someone hands behind there back is basic but that wasn't your initial point. You point was why were they sleeping. So hopefully you understand that cuffing did not answer your first statement.
3) I was answering your statement 'why not search him' not what could you do to prevent him from hurting someone if you happened to have missed a weapon on him after the initial search. I was just stating that I could see not searching him again at the campsite because they had already done and initial search. I would agree that an extra precautionary measure would be to cuff him just in case the watchman fell asleep but not alot of people plan for the watchman to fall asleep.
4) I don't think I made them sound like stooges, I think I made a pretty understandable point. If you are trained to do something and you do it everyday in your profession, your reaction times are quicker than someone who is not trained and does it occasionally. For instance if you use math everyday in your job you'll answer a math question faster than someone who does not, usually, of course there are exceptions. I was just referencing that they were outside of their field of expertise.
6) To say that all of the pioneers were battle harden and ready for anything, I think is a little over zealous and over romanticizing the old west. Were pioneers more knowledgable on many things such as: living off the land, defending there home against wild animals, and other things like that yes. But I would also say that I was just stating that about the group of people escorting Ben Wade. There is something to be said about the lack of experience for the rest of the people who were within there profession.
But I will take your advice and watch the original, because I enjoyed the remake, I'm sure I'll enjoy the original even more seeming the consensus is that it is better.
You forgot to mention the dumbest part. We are supposed to believe a gang of 7 o outlaws with prices on their heads can ride into a town and sit around in the open on their horses and threaten the town Marshall? In the real west it would have taken about 3 minutes for the towns people to shoot them off their horses and then pose smiling for photos with the bodies while they wait for the reward money to come rolling in.
On top of that,we are supposed to believe one of the gang can shout out to the town that he will pay anybody 200 dollars each for each of the guards they murder,and the people in the town start grabbing their guns to go shoot the deputies and Marshall?
I am a BIG fan of Elmore Leonard,but if he wrote this script he had to have been smoking some super weed when he wrote it because it may be the dumbest damn thing I have ever seen.
I was looking forward to a good western and started great with good actors, by half through thought this is awful but 88% at RT so maybe is a good ending so forced myself to sit through the rest and it didn't get any better.
9) Another issue with the decoy was that no-one went with the carriage, not even a guard. Would anyone believe they would transport Wade without any protection, knowing all his crew is close by, and all the people responsible for ensuring he gets there (also to get paid) instead go round to Batmans place for a beer?
I didn't think this movie was very good. I don't know much about old western culture, but if this movie is any way realistic, then I am disappointed to find that law enforcement back then were a bunch of incompetent morons.
Let me clarify. I didn't like this movie mainly because of the stupidity of the characters. I just couldn't buy how some of the scenes unfolded. I didn't think the plot was all that interesting either.
No4! while watching that scene i was WTF???They are all just sitting on the horses watching him lunge at the old man,that was absolutely ridiculous!! also what was the deal with the cuffs? his hands were still so far apart that it was almost the same as having no cuffs;-)