MovieChat Forums > Serenity (2005) Discussion > I liked it except excess Stars Wars ripo...

I liked it except excess Stars Wars ripoff


The smarmy dialogue was better than avg smarmy dialogue.
The cast was eccentric but effective.
It was cuter & smarmier than I expected but still better.

reply

Where does this "rip off" Star Wars?.

Didn't see a Jedi, nor Wookies, and not a Sith to be seen either, so where does Serenity rip off Star Wars in any way?.

Si vis pacem, para bellum

reply

Heroforoblivion

reply

Where does this "rip off" Star Wars?.
The OP was right on to the facts that it was set in space and they travelled in spaceships.🐭

reply

nor Wookies,


Well, Jayne....


--
Philo's Law: To learn from your mistakes, you have to realize you're making mistakes.

reply

And no Princess Leila. Wow. You're a genius. Not so much.

And now back to your learning from your mistakes.

reply

--- whoosh ---


--
Philo's Law: To learn from your mistakes, you have to realize you're making mistakes.

reply

your fundamental mistake.

Carry on.

reply

you can see the influence, but it's not a rip off, plus this came out the same year Sith came out and did better

reply

talk about Siths.

LMFAO @ Short Attention Span Epidemic

reply

I think any references to Star Wars is a loving homage not a rip off.

reply

another wolverine's eventually excessive tip o the hat

reply

I agree and the movie was very well done

reply

You obviously like the word "smarmy", but in the immortal words of Inigo Montoya, "You Keep Using That Word, I Do Not Think It Means What You Think It Means."

At least, I personally don't consider the dialog to be smarmy at all.

reply


DEEP!


And you signed up, timber. Good job.

reply

Let's get one thing straight, Star Wars was an amalgam of all the old movies and comics that George Lucas saw as a child. So can you really rip off something like that? Second, Joss acknowledged that he wanted Star Wars without the magic and aliens, and that Mal was loosely based on Han.

In the kingdom of the blind, you're the village idiot.

reply


Star Wars was an amalgam of all the old movies and comics that George Lucas saw as a child. So can you really rip off something like that?

YES. Yes you can. When you use a plethora of similar characters & situations from ONE source, instead of an amalgam from MULTIPLE sources, you just did.


Joss acknowledged that he wanted Star Wars without the magic and aliens

Of course he did. Anyone who is not mentally impaired knows he WANTED his own version of Star Wars. It is obvious.


Joss acknowledged ... Mal was loosely based on Han.

A few funny things about that:
a) The acknowledgement does not mean it didn't tilt into "rip off" territory.
b) And a few other characters were "loosely based on" other Star Wars characters.
c) Well, since you're being honest, drop the "loosely". This was TIGHT.
d) And most hilarious of all, you are just about THE ONLY ONE ON THIS BOARD WHO IS ABLE TO ADMIT IT. That speaks volumes about most imdb fanboys & fangirls.

reply

b) And a few other characters were "loosely based on" other Star Wars characters.
c) Well, since you're being honest, drop the "loosely". This was TIGHT.
Which characters from Serenity (2005) do you think were based on which Star Wars characters either loosely or tightly?
Han and Mal were both smugglers with the obvious difference being Mal shoots first, but I'm not seeing any other parallel characters.

___
Sorry, sometimes my wife forgets that she is not an alien from outer space.

reply

Mal shoots first

Have you even seen the theatrical version of A New Hope? Or are you just being "funny"?


Would You like to know more?

reply

Have you even seen the theatrical version of A New Hope? Or are you just being "funny"?
Yes I have seen the original theatrical version of A New Hope. I was referring to something Nathan Fillion said during one of the panels at a convention. I assumed he was trying to be funny (without the scare quotes).
Feel free to rant about George Lucas changing A New Hope. From the tone of your post I'm guessing this is a sore point with you. Go ahead and get it off your chest. It won't change anything. It probably won't even make you feel any better.

___
Sorry, sometimes my wife forgets that she is not an alien from outer space.

reply

Yes I have seen the original theatrical version of A New Hope. I was referring to something Nathan Fillion said during one of the panels at a convention. I assumed he was trying to be funny (without the scare quotes).
Feel free to rant about George Lucas changing A New Hope. From the tone of your post I'm guessing this is a sore point with you. Go ahead and get it off your chest. It won't change anything. It probably won't even make you feel any better.


Well, that was kinda hard to know without, well.. Knowing about that particular Con.

Well, it is sore point with me because it makes Han Solo way less of a bad ass. Some of the changes I really don't mind though. But Han shot first.

Would You like to know more?

reply

Well, that was kinda hard to know without, well.. Knowing about that particular Con.
It's a pretty famous quote among fans of the movie and series. You can even buy shirts with Mal saying "I shoot first".
Well, not you. It's obviously not something you would buy.
But I'm not sure what your point is. Are you saying it's funny if Nathan Fillion says it but not if I do? Perhaps you could clarify your "thinking".
Well, it is sore point with me because it makes Han Solo way less of a bad ass. Some of the changes I really don't mind though.
Good for you. You cling to that grudge even though you know it will never make a difference and will never make you feel better.
But Han shot first.
Nope. You can rent the movie Star Wars (1977) and see for yourself.

___
Sorry, sometimes my wife forgets that she is not an alien from outer space.

reply

It's a pretty famous quote among fans of the movie and series. You can even buy shirts with Mal saying "I shoot first".
Well, not you. It's obviously not something you would buy.
But I'm not sure what your point is. Are you saying it's funny if Nathan Fillion says it but not if I do? Perhaps you could clarify your "thinking".

Actually, it is something that I would buy. As i type this I'm wearing a Firefly themed t-shirt (one of many I own) and I had a friend knit me a Jayne hat. I am also somewhat active in several Facebook groups about Firefly.

The fact still remains: I don't pay the least interested in what happens at Cons because all the good ones are in USA and I live in Europe. I just scroll by Con-related things.

I'm saying that it wasn't funny because I didn't get the context.

Good for you. You cling to that grudge even though you know it will never make a difference and will never make you feel better.

One of the things I enjoy about being a bit of a geek and a nerd is bickering about small things that doesn't really matter in the end.

Nope. You can rent the movie Star Wars (1977) and see for yourself.

First of all, how in the high heavens do I even find a place that rents out the theatrical version of A New Hope?
Second of all, http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Han_shot_first
There you will find that even behind the scenes footage and the f-ing script says that Han shot first. Frell, the script even says Greedo didn't even fire.
Third of all, I happen to have the laserdisc version of A New Hope, i.e. the theatrical release, and guess who shots first?

See, bickering about small nerdy things is fun!

Would You like to know more?

reply

I'm saying that it wasn't funny because I didn't get the context.
Well, let me provide the context for you.
George Lucas created, wrote, and directed a movie called Star Wars which was released in 1977. George Lucas changed a scene so the hero no longer appeared to be a cold blooded killer but someone shooting in self defense. The "Mal shoots first" comment was a reference to that.
I'm not sure why you needed the context explained to you. Your posts indicate you know all this.
I'm also not sure why Nathan Fillion saying the same thing makes a difference. Surely you weren't under the impression that I was the first person to ever make that comment.
One of the things I enjoy about being a bit of a geek and a nerd is bickering about small things that doesn't really matter in the end.
bringbackberniew posted that many of the characters were based on Star Wars characters. I pointed out that the only characters that were remotely similar was Mal and Han since they were both smugglers and asked him to point out which characters in Serenity were based on Star Wars characters. Evidently he couldn't because he never responded.
And then you come along and hijack the thread because I included the often used comment that Mal shoots first. For some reason even after all these years you still can't get over the fact that George Lucas made Han the way he thought he should be instead of the way you think he should be.
First of all, how in the high heavens do I even find a place that rents out the theatrical version of A New Hope?
The version where Greedo shoots first was released to theaters. Didn't you know?
As a matter of fact, according to the link you provided, Greedo always shot first. It just wasn't as apparent in the firs release.
Second of all, http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Han_shot_first
From that link:
In a February 9, 2012 interview with The Hollywood Reporter, George Lucas indicated that Greedo fired first, even in the original film, and pointed out that the exchange of blaster fire between Han Solo and Greedo was shot in close-up which made the scene ambiguous. This ambiguity along with viewers' desire for Han Solo to be a cold-blooded killer caused the audience to draw the wrong conclusions, that is, they only thought Han shot first. Wide shots he added in later releases of the film served to make the actual results of the encounter more obvious.
Frell, the script even says Greedo didn't even fire.
No, it doesn't. Again, from the link you provided:
Suddenly the slimy alien disappears in a blinding flash of light. Han pulls his smoking gun from beneath the table as the other patrons look on in bemused amazement.
Nowhere does it say "Greedo didn't even fire." It doesn't mention whether Greedo fired or not. It's pretty safe to assume that, as both writer and director, George Lucas knew what he had in mind for the scene.
And even if the script had said Greedo didn't fire, directors deviate from scripts all the time. The director, not the writer, has the final say.
In this case the writer and director are the same person and both say Greedo shot first.
Third of all, I happen to have the laserdisc version of A New Hope, i.e. the theatrical release, and guess who shots first?
According to the director, Greedo did. It just wasn't apparent because it was shot in close up.
Funny how you go from not knowing where to find the original theatrical release to claiming to have it on laserdisc in just a few short lines.
See, bickering about small nerdy things is fun!
There is nothing to bicker about. George Lucas says Greedo shot first. Since George Lucas wrote, directed, and was executive producer he has the final say and that means you're wrong.

___
Sorry, sometimes my wife forgets that she is not an alien from outer space.

reply

Funny how you go from not knowing where to find the original theatrical release to claiming to have it on laserdisc in just a few short lines.


That's not what he said, now is it? The truth is that the original theatrical release not available for renting anywhere as far as I know, but it would take all of 15 seconds to buy it from Amazon. Maybe a little longer if you want the actual laserdisc instead of the DVD version whose source was the laserdisc.

George Lucas says Greedo shot first. Since George Lucas wrote, directed, and was executive producer he has the final say and that means you're wrong.


Now that's just silly. Just because George Lucas decided to change what originally happened 20 years later for the DVD release, alter it again 7 years later for another DVD release, make the forth version of that scene for the 2011 bluray release and then publicly and shamelessly lie that he meant it to look that way all along doesn't mean he has the "final say." I have the right to interpret that scene the only sane way that existed when I first saw the movie in the mid-eighties. And luckily I also have the opportunity to see it that way, thanks to the 2006 bonus disc release and Harmy's despecialized version.

I have a hard time deciding if you're actually that obtuse or just trolling the guy.

reply

That's not what he said, now is it?
Let's double check. I could be wrong. The first part of my claim is, "Funny how you go from not knowing where to find the original theatrical release...". He posted, "First of all, how in the high heavens do I even find a place that rents out the theatrical version of A New Hope?"
It appears he did say the first part.
The second part of my claim is "...to claiming to have it on laserdisc in just a few short lines." A few short lines from where he posted about not knowing where to rent the original theatrical release he posted, "Third of all, I happen to have the laserdisc version of A New Hope, i.e. the theatrical release..."
So it appears he said the second part, too.
Glad I could clear that up for you.
I have a hard time deciding if you're actually that obtuse or just trolling the guy.
So in your opinion the creator of a work has absolutely no say in the end product and anyone who disagrees with you is either obtuse or trolling because you say so.
Interesting.

___
Sorry, sometimes my wife forgets that she is not an alien from outer space.

reply

Hu !

You obviously have no clue what a "ripoff" is. 

---
A gentleman will not insult me, and no man not a gentleman can insult me.

reply

Thank you for that wonderfully insightful and detailed review.

reply