I really do, I just can't stand them. I especially hate the way Elizabeth drools over them and acts like they're so wonderful and they have so much to teach us. In Hide and Seek, a smoke monster got out and would have destroyed the base and killed everyone. Thank you, Ancients, for leaving it in Atlantis for anyone to find. Then there was the nanite virus that killed some of Rodney's team in Hot Zone. The Ancients left that laying around too. And the ascension machine in The Tao of Rodney, that did kill McKay but fortunately he got better. All these dangerous things laying around Atlantis and the Ancients just take off and leave it all there. Like the portal in Epiphany, which was the equivalent of leaving a mine or an uncapped well. You'd think if the Ancients were so smart they could have some kind of a safer portal that somebody couldn't just fall into by accident, which is what happened to Sheppard. If it wasn't for McKay, that Ancient death trap would have claimed Sheppard's life. Imagine if some kids were playing with a ball and chased it through that portal. You'd have a bunch of little skeletons in the cave on the other side, but do the Ancients care? Nope. Then there was The Return, where the Ancients not only kicked the expedition out of Atlantis, they kicked the Athosians off the planet. People shed blood and gave their lives to protect that city, those Ancients would have been trapped on their ship for thousands more years, but were they the least bit grateful? No, they were not. They just took over with no thought for the people who rescued them.
In Hide and Seek, a smoke monster got out and would have destroyed the base and killed everyone. Thank you, Ancients, for leaving it in Atlantis for anyone to find. Then there was the nanite virus that killed some of Rodney's team in Hot Zone. The Ancients left that laying around too. And the ascension machine in The Tao of Rodney, that did kill McKay but fortunately he got better. All these dangerous things laying around Atlantis and the Ancients just take off and leave it all there.
To be fair, they didn't just leave them lying around. They left them in their shielded underwater facility that could only be gated to from one place. The idea was that the city and all those dangerous experiments would either be destroyed when the shields failed or their (qualified) descendants would return. If they had any notion that quasi-bubbling primitives would take over the city (before the whole time travel thing, that is) I'm sure it was only in the context that they hoped they'd get themselves killed in their efforts to harness the city's technologies so they couldn't use it elevate their technological capabilities to the point where they'd be able to cause trouble for others.
Keep in mind how unlikely it was that anyone but the Ancients managed to return there and how even more unlikely it was that those individuals would be the good guys (as opposed to yet another megalomaniacal snake people bent on the enslavement of the galaxy). As a result, it wouldn't have made sense to baby proof the city from their perspectives as they didn't want the city to fall into the hands of someone who needed it to be baby proofed. Had it not been for Janus (who, upon realizing that the unlikely of all unlikely scenarios would happen, did the best he could in the limited time he had available) any non-qualified Ancients that gated there would have drained the shields and died/fled because there was no means left in place for non-qualified Ancients to raise the city. So that was how intruders were supposed to be stopped from messing with those things.
Like the portal in Epiphany, which was the equivalent of leaving a mine or an uncapped well. You'd think if the Ancients were so smart they could have some kind of a safer portal that somebody couldn't just fall into by accident, which is what happened to Sheppard. If it wasn't for McKay, that Ancient death trap would have claimed Sheppard's life. Imagine if some kids were playing with a ball and chased it through that portal. You'd have a bunch of little skeletons in the cave on the other side, but do the Ancients care?
How? By sending him food? He would have left in search of food earlier to find some had not that happened and he would have located the village just as he did by leaving later. By coming to rescue him? Had he not ascended with the others there's no reason to assume that he couldn't have survived there on his own for a lifetime.
Don't get me wrong, it's a potentially dangerous place to fall into alone but only if there's a naturally replenishing food source and there wasn't a recent population that brought farming equipment with them. I just don't see how the situation would have been deadly for Sheppard (had it not been for Mckay) given the conditions that existed when he arrived. It definitely is not a great situation to be in, but unless he killed himself (which, admittedly, is a possibility for someone living alone in isolation) he should have been physically fine had Mckay not reached him.
Btw, a better example of the Ancient's recklessness would be the non-protected gate system. It is because of that that evils like the Goa'uld and the Wraith were able to rise to, and hold on to, power. In their arrogance, they never imagined that their downfall was possible and thus they never imagined that the gate system could be used in such a way. They (or their successors - I suspect that the reason they were trying to expedite the development of humans in the Pegasus galaxy was so they could take their place) were always supposed to be there to keep others from misusing the Stargates and they were supposed to be more than capable of maintaining control of them with their vastly superior technology. Obviously, things didn't work out that way and it is because that lack of foresight that untold billions were enslaved and murdered. Any mistakes they made pale in comparison to that because that is the reason that all the others became the problem that they were.
reply share
To be fair, they didn't just leave them lying around. They left them in their shielded underwater facility that could only be gated to from one place.
That's like saying burying your gate would protect you from the Wraith, or the Goa'uld, or the Replicators. The idea that shielding and submerging the city would protect all the dangers in it forever is naive. From people as supposedly advanced as the Ancients, it's disingenuous and even willfully blind. It's just my opinion, but there's no way, once you leave everything behind, that you can guarantee people won't get into it.
Keep in mind how unlikely it was that anyone but the Ancients managed to return there and how even more unlikely it was that those individuals would be the good guys (as opposed to yet another megalomaniacal snake people bent on the enslavement of the galaxy).
And yet people did come, and they did get in the city, and the technology of the city did prove deadly even after the expedition came to realize how careless the Ancients had been and how many deadly traps there were in the city. How many people, including Carson, died from seemingly innocuous artifacts? Again, just my opinion, but to me, what the Ancients did is the same as leaving a mine field with a sign "Don't Walk Here."
If they had any notion that quasi-bubbling primitives would take over the city (before the whole time travel thing, that is) I'm sure it was only in the context that they hoped they'd get themselves killed in their efforts to harness the city's technologies...any non-qualified Ancients that gated there would have drained the shields and died/fled because there was no means left in place for non-qualified Ancients to raise the city. So that was how intruders were supposed to be stopped from messing with those things.
I agree. It's quite consistent with the complete lack of humanity of the Ancients that they would callously set things up to kill anyone who happened to find themselves in Atlantis.
If it wasn't for McKay, that Ancient death trap would have claimed Sheppard's life.
How? By sending him food? He would have left in search of food earlier to find some had not that happened and he would have located the village just as he did by leaving later. By coming to rescue him? Had he not ascended with the others there's no reason to assume that he couldn't have survived there on his own for a lifetime.
That's a lovely picture, Sheppard living out his life and dying all alone on an alien planet, wondering why his friends never came to get him. McKay came to get Sheppard, thus saving him from being marooned on that planet for the rest of his life. What difference does it make if Sheppard starved to death in the cave or lived out his life all alone after the others ascended, his life would still have been claimed by the Ancient death trap. And as I said, and you quoted, what if it was some kids playing and they went through the portal? The planet wasn't shielded from anyone going down there. Explorers in ships could have gone there, set up a colony, and someone could have been lost and died in the Ancient death trap. Why would they set up the equivalent of an uncapped well? Why would they have it that you can't get back, considering that it's perfectly possible to get in by accident? As you admit yourself, even Sheppard might have killed himself. He was pretty upset at the thought he'd been abandoned, and if he was all alone and those people hadn't been there, at the very least he might have gone crazy. And how I pity the next person who falls in by accident. It happened once, it could happen again, but did those people who ascended care? Nope. And once they ascended, we know they wouldn't be concerned with anyone else caught in their death trap.
a better example of the Ancient's recklessness would be the non-protected gate system. It is because of that that evils like the Goa'uld and the Wraith were able to rise to, and hold on to, power. In their arrogance, they never imagined that their downfall was possible and thus they never imagined that the gate system could be used in such a way.
That's a good example too. As you say, pure arrogance and lack of concern. I just rewatched The Game, and that's a pretty awful example of Ancient arrogance and how little they think of humans. Taking total control of people's lives, how horrible that they would use whole societies as guinea pigs and manipulate them down to their hairstyles. Weir was furious with Sheppard and McKay, but that was misplaced aggression. The ones she should have been mad at were the Ancients, setting up such an awful device to begin with.
I'm going to go Zen here and say that people like Weir, with the "Oh, to sit at the feet of the Ancients and imbibe their wisdome!" attitude, make a fundamental mistake and confuse technology with civilization. The Ancients were incredibly technologically advanced, so advanced they could even make a machine that could bring about ascension. But spiritually, morally, they were incredibly primitive. They strictly prevented anyone of their number from helping the lower beings, even when the lower beings were suffering from situations they had created. Like Daniel. He could stay with Jack and try to comfort him when he was being tortured to death by Baal, but he couldn't save him because the Ancients wouldn't let him. That's a prime example of their lack of balance, their loss of whatever humanity they might once have had. The Replicators, whom the Ancients specifically created, ran rampant through Pegasus, but did they lift an astral finger? Nope. It's all lower beings, and it just doesn't matter to them if the lower beings are all killed by something the Ancients created. Thank you, Vala, for telling Daniel she understood why he came back from ascension and that she wouldn't have liked the Ancients either. And thank you, McKay, for saying the Ancients allowed the Wraith to evolve through negligence.
That's like saying burying your gate would protect you from the Wraith, or the Goa'uld, or the Replicators. The idea that shielding and submerging the city would protect all the dangers in it forever is naive. From people as supposedly advanced as the Ancients, it's disingenuous and even willfully blind. It's just my opinion, but there's no way, once you leave everything behind, that you can guarantee people won't get into it.
And yet people did come, and they did get in the city, and the technology of the city did prove deadly even after the expedition came to realize how careless the Ancients had been and how many deadly traps there were in the city. How many people, including Carson, died from seemingly innocuous artifacts? Again, just my opinion, but to me, what the Ancients did is the same as leaving a mine field with a sign "Don't Walk Here."
How they set things up was actually rather successful. The only reason their precautions didn't work was because of subterfuge. Had Janus not built in a method for the city to rise to the surface for Weir these intruders would have drained the remaining ZPM power and been forced to flee before they could get into any of that trouble. And, of course, had he not built a time machine against their directives Weir wouldn't have been able to go back in time to ask him to do it.
So, yeah, of course it was possible that someone besides the Ancients could get into the city. However, being able to stay in the city was supposed to require a level of knowledge above what the expedition had. With that level of knowledge, the technology left behind wouldn't have been dangerous because these hypothetical people wouldn't have been so stupid as to go around randomly turning things on that they didn't understand.
That's a lovely picture, Sheppard living out his life and dying all alone on an alien planet, wondering why his friends never came to get him. McKay came to get Sheppard, thus saving him from being marooned on that planet for the rest of his life. What difference does it make if Sheppard starved to death in the cave or lived out his life all alone after the others ascended, his life would still have been claimed by the Ancient death trap. And as I said, and you quoted, what if it was some kids playing and they went through the portal? The planet wasn't shielded from anyone going down there. Explorers in ships could have gone there, set up a colony, and someone could have been lost and died in the Ancient death trap. Why would they set up the equivalent of an uncapped well? Why would they have it that you can't get back, considering that it's perfectly possible to get in by accident? As you admit yourself, even Sheppard might have killed himself. He was pretty upset at the thought he'd been abandoned, and if he was all alone and those people hadn't been there, at the very least he might have gone crazy. And how I pity the next person who falls in by accident. It happened once, it could happen again, but did those people who ascended care? Nope. And once they ascended, we know they wouldn't be concerned with anyone else caught in their death trap.
Again, I don't disagree. I just wanted to clarify that one bit where you said that he would have died. I was not suggesting that because he wouldn't have died it's a pleasant place to accidentally fall into.
They strictly prevented anyone of their number from helping the lower beings, even when the lower beings were suffering from situations they had created. Like Daniel. He could stay with Jack and try to comfort him when he was being tortured to death by Baal, but he couldn't save him because the Ancients wouldn't let him.
It's an interesting moral argument that I don't think there's a right answer to. The other side would ask; how does Daniel save Jack? Does he kill Ba'al or does he just whisk Jack away? If the latter, what does he do when Ba'al continues to hurt people? Ba'al is not going to stop on his own. Someone has to make him stop. The same goes for all agents of bad intent everywhere. So it's easily to think that the moral thing would be to set up an authoritative "utopia" where these ascended powers are used to prevent any and all harmful acts upon the larger population. But is it really a service to people to take away their ability to make mistakes that they can learn from (where you the draw the line? torture and death are obvious no-nos, but is it okay to beat someone up or does that require ascended intervention as well?) and what kind of mental toll does it take on the beings moderating other life forms like this?
The major argument that the Ancients have is that it's a slippery slope. There may very well be those that can handle being the arbiters of morality for the lower plane, but they recognize that many cannot and will begin to like the power that they have and ultimately crave more. As a result, they will become like those that they sought to stop; they will be the new gods, dictating every facet of people's lives and brutally stamping out descent in order to maintain a strict worship of themselves as that is what is necessary to increase their power.
Such a situation is much worse than the one that they sought to stop because in the case of Goa'uld brutality, there's a mortal problem of limited scope that can be solved through mortal means. So, while it may seem harsh to see suffering in front of you and do nothing, is it really the right thing to do something about it if you know such actions will lead to more suffering in the long run?
The argument of many real world imperialists was that they, the more advanced civilization, had a moral obligation to intercede in the lives of the "barbarians." They were said to be immoral people who were killing each other and therefore needed European education and moral instruction. This led to centuries of mass murder and exploitation by those arguing moral superiority. So, let me ask you, do you think there was a way they could have interceded in lives of native populations to stop things like human sacrifice and war without the much more devastating actions that followed or would it have been better if they allowed them to advance on their own timetables by leaving them alone? Keep in mind that as much as you may feel that you, as an individual, know better, once you open that gate you're opening it to all facets of human desire and motivation. So we're not talking about what you or I might do, but what the larger population would do.
Mind you, the Ancients take it to an extreme by any measure. To apply the same logic of non-interference to a partially descended being (Anubis) despite it being impossible for non-ascended beings to kill him and despite his having ascended knowledge that brought him to the brink of destroying a galaxy is insane. They claimed that allowing him to kill everyone in the Milky Way was morally justifiable because they had the populations of many galaxies to worry about. The thing though is that I don't actually believe that they ever intended to let Anubis destroy the galaxy. Rather, I think it was a carefully orchestrated plot to force Oma to act on her own and thus remove her from a position where she can continue to ascend people while also sending a message to the others that doing the same would not be tolerated. And that's a problem because it means that they are deviating from their position of non-interference by using the lower planes as chess pieces in their internal moral arguments. By extending this umbrella of non-interference to Anubis they allowed one of their own to kill in order to teach a lesson about how it was wrong to interfere. Only that's a form of interference and so by doing that they've already began to show cracks in their ideology that can lead to a slippery slope situation.
reply share
The only reason their precautions didn't work was because of subterfuge. Had Janus not built in a method for the city to rise to the surface for Weir these intruders would have drained the remaining ZPM power and been forced to flee before they could get into any of that trouble.
I will remind you that by the time they realized they couldn't keep the shield up, it was too late to dial out and evacuate the city. Dialing the gate would have dropped the shield and everyone would have drowned. In any case, we will certainly have to agree to disagree on this point. I think if you leave your house booby-trapped to kill anybody who gets into it and then you walk away planning never to return to it, that's an appalling lack of humanity and a callous disregard of the people who might get in, tantamount to murder.
Again, I don't disagree. I just wanted to clarify that one bit where you said that he would have died. I was not suggesting that because he wouldn't have died it's a pleasant place to accidentally fall into.
I didn't say Sheppard would have died. I said his life would have been lost, and it would have. Sheppard might have starved to death in the cave, particularly if he had been injured going through the force field so slowly trying to get back and was hurt too badly to go on, or he might have lived out his life all alone behind the force field and died without ever knowing why no one came for him, if it wasn't for McKay. And the death trap is still there. Typically of the Ancients, as soon as they ascend themselves out of harm's way, they don't care what happens on the lower plane. For the third time, I will point out that people could settle on that planet and anyone could get trapped behind that force field. Once again I will say that kids could be playing with a ball and chase it through the portal, and then you'd have dead kids in the Ancient death trap.
It's an interesting moral argument that I don't think there's a right answer to. The other side would ask; how does Daniel save Jack? Does he kill Ba'al or does he just whisk Jack away? If the latter, what does he do when Ba'al continues to hurt people?
The morality of it comes in where the Ancients will literally prevent someone from saving a dear friend. I never said they should be responsible for everything everywhere. They're not gods, no matter how many people like Weir drool over them, and I wouldn't expect them to look at the Goa'uld and figure they should help with that particular problem. However, when an ascended being sees a friend, someone they fought beside in their previous life, someone who saved them in their previous life, being horribly tortured, that ascended being ought to be able to help that person. They shouldn't be stopped. The Ancients let Oma go around ascending people and she let Anubis slip through and that was fine with them. Really saving one tiny little human from torture and death shouldn't even be a blip on their radar.
Mind you, the Ancients take it to an extreme by any measure. To apply the same logic of non-interference to a partially descended being (Anubis) despite it being impossible for non-ascended beings to kill him and despite his having ascended knowledge that brought him to the brink of destroying a galaxy is insane.
Exactly. The Ancients are mental giants and moral pygmies. They allow Anubis to run amok through the Milky Way for thousands of years, they allow Oma to continue ascending people. Those are two things they are responsible for, and they just don't care. But I'd like to get back to the Pegasus galaxy, since it's the Atlantis forum. The Ancients created the Replicators, and they totally had a responsibility and a moral duty to deal with that situation, before or after ascension. All right, they may not have realized the Replicators were still around before they ascended, but they certainly knew when the Replicators were wiping out whole populations. And they stood by and did nothing, which is rather the equivalent of starting a fire in a hotel and then watching people burn to death when you have the power to put the fire out.
As to the Wraith, they could have done something about the Wraith, and it needn't have been some big imperial takeover, or even genocide. They could have turned the Wraith human, and left them to sort things out with everyone else. There was never a point where the Wraith and the humans could peacefully coexist, because humans are the only food source for the Wraith. Turning them human wouldn't have changed their personality or culture, but Michael and Todd both saw having to feed on humans as a weakness of the Wraith, and they were right about that. If they were humans, some of them would have stayed aggressive, but a great many more would have come to terms eventually with the other humans of the galaxy.
I will remind you that by the time they realized they couldn't keep the shield up, it was too late to dial out and evacuate the city. Dialing the gate would have dropped the shield and everyone would have drowned. In any case, we will certainly have to agree to disagree on this point.
I'm aware. In my first post I said "died/fled" with the fled part referring to Weir, Sheppard, and anyone in a different hypothetical scenario who weren't in such a tight spot...
"any non-qualified Ancients that gated there would have drained the shields and died/fled"
I just dropped the died part in my second post for whatever reason.
I think if you leave your house booby-trapped to kill anybody who gets into it and then you walk away planning never to return to it, that's an appalling lack of humanity and a callous disregard of the people who might get in, tantamount to murder.
They weren't planning to never return and a more apt analogy would be a military base. If you abandon a military base that's built into a mountain, hoping to return at a later date, and entering this military base requires one use technical knowledge to break in, are intruders not assuming the the risk that comes with that? Do they not know that they're likely to find dangerous equipment that, if they tamper with, might kill them?
You keep referring to the Ancient experiments as traps, but they're not traps. Walking into a lab and carelessly turning on a machine without doing proper research is not the same as walking into someone's house and having an anvil drop on your head because you walked into a trip wire that you didn't know was there.
I didn't say Sheppard would have died. I said his life would have been lost, and it would have. Sheppard might have starved to death in the cave, particularly if he had been injured going through the force field so slowly trying to get back and was hurt too badly to go on, or he might have lived out his life all alone behind the force field and died without ever knowing why no one came for him, if it wasn't for McKay. And the death trap is still there. Typically of the Ancients, as soon as they ascend themselves out of harm's way, they don't care what happens on the lower plane.
It didn't seem like that's what you meant since you said it would claim his life in one sentence and that your hypothetical kids would be skeletons in the cave, implying that you thought it was an instant death trap in that particular context. But fair enough.
For the third time, I will point out that people could settle on that planet and anyone could get trapped behind that force field. Once again I will say that kids could be playing with a ball and chase it through the portal, and then you'd have dead kids in the Ancient death trap.
And for the second time I will say that I don't disagree with you. I didn't comment on that part of your post the first time around because we were in agreement on that and I attempted to explain in my previous post that I was just trying to clarify the facts behind what you said about Sheppard so I don't know why this needs repeating.
All right, they may not have realized the Replicators were still around before they ascended, but they certainly knew when the Replicators were wiping out whole populations. And they stood by and did nothing, which is rather the equivalent of starting a fire in a hotel and then watching people burn to death when you have the power to put the fire out.
How though should they stop them? The first time around they didn't understand what they created and essentially attempted a mass genocide. Should they do that again? It's what the expedition did, but they are less evolved and they were fighting and "us" versus them battle (which isn't at all to say it was right, btw). As ascended beings the Ancients do not have a stake in the conflict so who are they to prioritize one form of life over another?
Yes, they created the replicators, but they also created humans so, again, you have a slippery slope. Are they not responsible when humans harm others? Should they not intercede when humans cause harm? How does one justify (without interjecting prejudice into the mix) doing something about the replicators and not humans and if they do things about both how do they avoid creating the authoritative scenario that I previously described?
As to the Wraith, they could have done something about the Wraith, and it needn't have been some big imperial takeover, or even genocide. They could have turned the Wraith human, and left them to sort things out with everyone else.
That's like saying it would be morally acceptable to end racism by using hypothetical technology to force one race to become another. You can't change someone's identify against their will and justify that as a moral act. You would have been better off if you said they should have removed the need for the Wraith to feed (which the later episodes showed was possible without radically altering their biology). Although that's not necessarily a viable solution because without the need to feed there wouldn't be that check in place to keep them from vastly expanding their numbers, which would be bad if they justified going after humans for another reason.
And, again, humans are a problem that the Ancients created as well. Turning them into fluffy bunny rabbits would stop them from being violent against others, but that doesn't make it right. Why then would you suggest they do that to the Wraith? Is it because they're not human that it's okay to you?
There was never a point where the Wraith and the humans could peacefully coexist, because humans are the only food source for the Wraith. Turning them human wouldn't have changed their personality or culture, but Michael and Todd both saw having to feed on humans as a weakness of the Wraith, and they were right about that. If they were humans, some of them would have stayed aggressive, but a great many more would have come to terms eventually with the other humans of the galaxy.
Or not. Yes, their current primary motivation for treating humans the way they do is that they are a source of food. However, it also put them in a position of power that they may not be likely to give up, leading to them trying to create a militaristic dictatorship.
Another problem is that the actual humans (in a broad sense) are not going to be accepting of them (and no, not maybe... definitely). Humans have a massive history of demonizing the "Other" and finding reasons to persecute them. Here you have living monsters (in the sense that they look and act like how demonized Others are depicted) transformed into humans. Do you think people wouldn't think of them as dangerous subversives that need to be wiped out? Not only can they blend into human societies, (for who knows what dastardly reason) but they can breed with the so called "actual humans." Oh, sure, the people from Atlantis will claim that it doesn't make a difference because they are genetically the same, but people would nevertheless be in hysterics over the idea that their children could be part Wraith (and they would be quick to blame problems ranging from simple aggression to actual deformities to children having Wraith parentage).
The idea to turn the Wraith into humans may be well meaning, but it's the perfect formula for mass persecutions. Suspicion of outsiders would increase many fold. It would start out with them being questioned to try to determine if they can prove where they are from (aka that they're not humanized Wraith). Exclusionary tactics would be used, leading to increased isolation among populations and increased paranoia. In no time you'd have people being tortured to get them to admit to being Wraith and to admit to being up to some evil scheme (which people would admit to and which those doing the tortures would use to justify continuing the persecution). Then you'd have people being exterminated and exiled within communities and, ultimately, you'd have efforts to rid other planets of "secret Wraith." Without the Wraith feeding on people there would no longer be limits in place regarding population and territorial expansion. That means there would be groups who will look to what other people have as desirable and how would they justify supplanting them? By accusing them of being Wraith, of course.
It would be the conquest of the New World all over again. More advanced societies would devastate primitive societies under the most flimsy of justifications. Have you read the "Odyssey?" Remember, the human eating Cyclops? That's a demonized human. It's someone who is an island lord whose land is depicted as being ideal for colonization. The inhuman appearance, the people eating, and inhospitality are traits ascribed to him to justify future colonization. The same thing will happen with your human Wraith. Unliked people will be said to have been seen transforming into Wraith, eating people, and so on and so forth.
Meanwhile these attitudes would keep the actual humanized Wraith as outsiders and bolster their fear and hatred of humans, leading to actual conflict between these groups (as opposed to just fake witch hunts) and that conflict would be used to justify all the evil things both groups think about each other, leading to more conflict.
So, no, the Ancients cannot just turn the Wraith into humans and then wipe heir hands of the situation. It would be nice if it were that simple, but it is not. There would be consequences and those consequences would be severe. Follow up involvement to control human versus human and human versus humanized Wraith violence would be needed and it would need to be highly involved. It would actually be less devastating in the long run to commit genocide by wiping all the Wraith from existence, which I am pointing out not to advocate that position but to highlight just how devastating your proposed solution is.
reply share
Agreeing to disagree on the Ancients callous abandonment of Atlantis with all its deadly traps.
It didn't seem like that's what you meant since you said it would claim his life in one sentence and that your hypothetical kids would be skeletons in the cave, implying that you thought it was an instant death trap in that particular context. But fair enough.
Thank you. As I also said, that portal is like an uncapped well. Some kid might fall in an uncapped well (remember Jessica McClure?) and die a slow miserable death and that wouldn't be an instant death trap, but their life would still be claimed. Same thing.
How though should they stop them? The first time around they didn't understand what they created and essentially attempted a mass genocide. Should they do that again? It's what the expedition did, but they are less evolved and they were fighting and "us" versus them battle (which isn't at all to say it was right, btw). As ascended beings the Ancients do not have a stake in the conflict so who are they to prioritize one form of life over another? Yes, they created the replicators, but they also created humans so, again, you have a slippery slope.
The Ancients didn't create humans. In the canon of the show, we are the second evolution of this particular life form. So yeah, I think if you have innocent beings, and you've created a monstrous weapon that is wiping those beings out, you have a responsibility to stop your weapon that you created from killing the innocents. As to how the Ancients would do it, they could destroy every single Replicator cell in the Pegasus galaxy with a single thought. You are quite right that as ascended beings out of harm's way they have no stake in the battle. If they were as morally advanced as they were technologically advanced, they would have an incentive to help, the incentive of pure compassion for innocents being slaughtered, and they would have an incentive to clean up the mess they created by making the Replicators in the first place, but lacking all compassion and decency, it is quite true they don't have to bother.
Why then would you suggest they do that to the Wraith? Is it because they're not human that it's okay to you?
There is no need to be rude. The Wraith are part human and part bug. Making them all human would simply continue an evolutionary process that began long ago. I notice you haven't come up with any solution, unless your idea is to just let things go on as they are, the Wraith culling humans, the humans living in fear, so many lives being lost, and the Pegasus galaxy being a place where no one, not the Wraiths nor the humans, can really advance themselves.
So, no, the Ancients cannot just turn the Wraith into humans and then wipe heir hands of the situation. It would be nice if it were that simple, but it is not. There would be consequences and those consequences would be severe. Follow up involvement to control human versus human and human versus humanized Wraith violence would be needed and it would need to be highly involved. It would actually be less devastating in the long run to commit genocide by wiping all the Wraith from existence, which I am pointing out not to advocate that position but to highlight just how devastating your proposed solution is.
Again, we will have to agree to disagree. My proposed solution is not devastating. It puts everyone on the same level on the playing field. There's no point in going on about the new world, Polyphemus (the name of the cyclops in the Odyssey), the attitudes of humans in the Pegasus galaxy, and so forth. All of those things are irrelevant, because in the long run, people may fight but they do find ways to coexist. Some humans would never accept the former Wraith, and some humans would. Some former Wraith would never adjust to getting along with humans, and some would. Eventually a balance would be found. The important thing, and this is why my solution is so perfect, is that turning the Wraith into humans would preserve both sides, while putting them on an equal footing and creating a genuine opportunity for them to coexist. And the Ancients could easily do it, and they are morally responsible for the Wraith because they chose to put people on a planet with the Iratus bug and then were negligent about what happened on that planet. Again, if you create a situation where innocent lives are being lost, you are morally responsible for cleaning up that situation. Obviously there is no one holding the Ancients accountable for their deplorable actions, but that does not excuse them from their guilt. Their refusal to address the devastation and suffering they've caused just makes them more culpable.
The Ancients didn't create humans. In the canon of the show, we are the second evolution of this particular life form. So yeah, I think if you have innocent beings, and you've created a monstrous weapon that is wiping those beings out, you have a responsibility to stop your weapon that you created from killing the innocents.
Humans are the second evolution of the human form because the Ancients put into place the groundwork for humans to evolve on Earth after the plague. So, yes, the Ancients are as responsible for the destruction caused by humans as they are by the destruction caused by the Asurans.
Further, the Ancients in some way seeded human life throughout the Pegasus galaxy, (whether through the same directed evolution approach or otherwise is unknown) directed the technological development of an unknown number of them, and helped humans on Earth develop early forms of civilization. So they didn't just create humans, they artificially advanced them and spread their population throughout an entire galaxy.
As to how the Ancients would do it, they could destroy every single Replicator cell in the Pegasus galaxy with a single thought.
They do have the power to destroy them without impediment, but not in a single thought. An ascended being's power is localized and they take time to travel from place to place.
In any case, you're still advocating mass genocide of one sapient being over another without providing any justification for why the Asurans should be destroyed for wanting to wipe out humans when humans shouldn't be destroyed for wanting to wipe out all Asurans.
Also, I would point out that the Asurans weren't actually interested in wiping out humanity. That was how their programming rationalized a directive (to wipe out the Wraith) that was forced on them by the Ancients and reactivated by humans after the Wraith figured out how to deactivate it. So they're victims of the equivalent of mass brain washing. They had been able to attack humans for 10,000 years and largely left them alone prior to Mckay's tampering. The only thing they did prior to that (that we know about) is to try to take Atlantis from humans with the threat of force, but if they all deserve to die for that does that mean the Genii all deserve to be eradicated?
You are quite right that as ascended beings out of harm's way they have no stake in the battle. If they were as morally advanced as they were technologically advanced, they would have an incentive to help, the incentive of pure compassion for innocents being slaughtered, and they would have an incentive to clean up the mess they created by making the Replicators in the first place, but lacking all compassion and decency, it is quite true they don't have to bother.
Again, I maintain that we're talking about two groups capable of slaughter and if you're going to say it's moral for them to get involved in stopping the Asurans, then you can't stop there by saying it's not okay for them to then get involved in stopping human violence. However, as I explained previously, that cannot be accomplished without also ridding the universe of them or both restricting their free will and putting ascended beings in a position where abuse of power is likely.
There is no need to be rude.
I'm not sure why you perceived that as rude, but I can tell you that it was not intended as such.
The Wraith are part human and part bug. Making them all human would simply continue an evolutionary process that began long ago.
The Wraith are likely to lose their ability to feed on humans long before becoming fully human and it's feeding on humans which makes them more like them. The final result should be something along what the hybrids looked like, at best, or at worst, they should still mostly look like they do now just without the suckers.
However, even if what you said were true, let's say the Asgard represented human's evolutionary future. Forget that they look like that because of cloning. Let's, for arguments sake, say that the Ancients knew that humans were going to naturally evolve into that form. Would it be okay for them to turn all humans into that to pacify them? How would you like to wake up one day in a frail, weak body that you did not identify as your own?
I notice you haven't come up with any solution, unless your idea is to just let things go on as they are, the Wraith culling humans, the humans living in fear, so many lives being lost, and the Pegasus galaxy being a place where no one, not the Wraiths nor the humans, can really advance themselves.
I find it curious that you thought it was possible that I was arguing for anything other than them doing nothing. But, yes, that's my position. I agree that they screwed up, but at this point I do think they need to step back and let these groups work things out for themselves. Interventionism comes from a good place, but it doesn't work. We've seen that in our own history. People say they want to help the native group. They want to stop them from killing each other, they want to educate them, bring them into European society, and so on. However, it leads to devastation, slavery, and loss of culture. That's why, today, the idea of leaving alone the last "untouched" tribes in remote parts of the world is so valued.
My argument has therefore been that this type of no-win scenario is the position that the Ancients are in. They've become too powerful to try to intercede without some number of them abusing their power, which would lead to even to worse atrocities, and there's no viable solution for ending conflict that doesn't involve genocide, loss of identity, and/or loss of free will.
Remember, humans have something that is of value to ascended beings so it's not just about their actions leading to worse consequence. That is a concern and it is something they are susceptible to as seen by how Orlin's efforts to try to help humans defend themselves lead to their own destruction. Meaning, they don't know if what they try to do will lead to a better outcome and they can easily get stuck into a endless cycle where they intervene to try to fix past interventions leading to an ultimately worse future than if they did nothing. However, their biggest concern is that intervention is a stepping stone to exploitation. Their position may seem harsh, but they know that there are those among them who would not be able to then resist justifying doing to humans what the Ori do, and that's something I think we can all agree needs to be avoided.
You keep saying that they should do this or that, but you don't address how they can avoid abuse by taking that step. The problem, for me, is that I don't think it's possible. Telling them to go in and just do this, this, and that is like telling the Europeans, during the Age of Exploitation, to go the New World and only offer help to native populations. That wouldn't happen. Once you allow contact, people will see that they have gold and begin to exploit them for it. As evolved as ascended beings are, that base motivation is still very much there for them and it scares enough of them that they have adopted such strict rules.
Again, we will have to agree to disagree. My proposed solution is not devastating. It puts everyone on the same level on the playing field. There's no point in going on about the new world, Polyphemus (the name of the cyclops in the Odyssey), the attitudes of humans in the Pegasus galaxy, and so forth. All of those things are irrelevant, because in the long run, people may fight but they do find ways to coexist. Some humans would never accept the former Wraith, and some humans would. Some former Wraith would never adjust to getting along with humans, and some would. Eventually a balance would be found. The important thing, and this is why my solution is so perfect, is that turning the Wraith into humans would preserve both sides, while putting them on an equal footing and creating a genuine opportunity for them to coexist. And the Ancients could easily do it, and they are morally responsible for the Wraith because they chose to put people on a planet with the Iratus bug and then were negligent about what happened on that planet.
I'm sorry, but this baseless idealism. The reason I brought up all the things I did is because humans have a massive history of abusing those who are not like them. We are, today, locked in an age old pattern of genocide and persecution that exists because of dislike of unlike, fear mongering, scapegoating, and demonization of the other. Would some humans be able to accept humanized Wraith? Yes. But would many be unable/unwilling to? Also yes.
The problem is three-fold.
One, acceptance is a fragile thing. You don't like when I reference historical examples, but if you change your mind on that I can quote to you primary source after primary source where people don't understand how it is that people who were their accepting neighbors one day could turn into their persecutors the next. It takes very little. Illness, a missing child, (see Blood Libel) crop failure, a natural disaster, etc., and all of the sudden this group living next to you is going to be blamed.
Two, those who will be unwilling are many. We're not talking about socially and morally advanced societies here. We're talking about very primitive, superstitious people mixed in with single minded militaristic groups. Both have suffered under the Wraith for thousands of years. The situation could not be more perfect for the former to get together in Wraith persecuting bands and the latter to try to expand territoriality by using the guise of eradicating the Wraith to accomplish that.
Three, your idealized future where there's a chance for them to work it out is a long way into their future and is extremely bloody. The reason I keep referencing historical examples is because we've seen this happen over and over and over again. At some point in the future I truly hope we can get beyond that but we haven't yet and the conditions in the fictional Pegasus galaxy are such that we can use history to know quite certainly that your solution would lead to a very long set of periods of mass killings and genocide that could very easily be worse than what is going on right now.
Right now there's a reason for humans to unite against an outside threat. Overcoming that threat will not come without bloodshed, but that suffering and that death has the potential to join people together in a way that could lead to better interactions between them in a post-Wraith galaxy. Meaning, possibly less death and less suffering overall. Your solution, whether you realize it or not, advocates for creating suspicion among these wildly unconnected groups that will, without question, pit them against each other in the most brutal and horrific fashion possible for an untold number of years.
It's possible that the path to your idealized future will lead to less death and suffering but it's not guaranteed and, frankly, I think that's rather unlikely given the bad position that the Wraith were in at the end of the series, the rising power of Earth, the hint of advanced societies coming out of hiding, and the beginnings of efforts for even simple groups to mobilize against the Wraith. Unless something goes screwy, allowing the Wraith to rise in power again and, in doing so, throw the galaxy (and possibly the Milky Way with it if they find a way to get there) into another multi-thousand year period of their treating humans like cattle, I think humans are in a good position to force a resolution on their own.
reply share
I have to disagree with you on this whole "non intervention thing" basic rule of thumb "after ascension clean up your toys" Like the Vorlons did in B5, when they left the galaxy all of their technology was safely hidden on their homeworld with a very clear "we left a strong defense, We mean strong as in "you will be able to breach them in milion years or so, and by that point there really will not be any point for doing so""
And what did Ancients do? Well after ascension they just left everything, like a child leaving a room. Humans were never ready for stargate tech, neither were Goa'uld. And yet they could just use it with a little tinkering. That is the equivalent of leaving military grade tech in some underdeveloped country. And even that does not really cut it. While I am not a great fan of star trek the whole prime directive thing was really spot on, you are saying that saving a person is dangerous intervention and yet leaving technology that can be used to enslave millions is not? Ancients were really great inventors and their technology was simply amazing but they had morality of roman empire "lower races... frack you" . They made plenty of mistakes, were increadibly vain and full of themselves. And yes I get it, being the oldest, most powerfull and most developed civilisation in existence does not exactly create a good ground for being humble. I bet for the most of their civilisation cycle they were basicly alone in the universe, and could see the origin of most forms of inteligent life. But let's not put them on the pedestal. USA have great technology, nobody in the world can deny that, but does that make USA a paragon of morality? No. They are just a guys with massive amount of power, they will sometimes be dicks about it, sometimes they will try to create something good and it will blow in their faces, and sometimes they are a force for good in the world.
Now do I hate Ancients? No. Because despite all that power they TRIED to be moral, I don't know if I would be as good being in the same position. Their technology allowed us to develop much faster then we would without it and they serve as great lesson in humility "It does not matter how strong you are, you can always majorly screw up"
The Ancients didn't all ascend at once though and they're not soothsayers. Meaning, they don't know whether the technology they're removing will be useful to the still living Ancients or to some other party.
So, for example, the first great ascension event happened 5-10 million years ago, when they were dying from the plague. However, some avoided infection and started anew in Pegasus. Should the ascended Ancients have removed all of their technology from the Milky Way at that point? What if the corporal Ancients were forced back to the Milky Way and needed that technology to restart their civilization and survive? That was almost the situation they were in, but time had removed too much of that technology for most of them to see that as a worthwhile pursuit so a bunch chose to seek ascension.
What this means is that the Ancients didn't simply fail to clean up after themselves, per say. Rather, they entrusted the handling of their physical constructs to their physical brethren. But when that went bad, what were they supposed to do? Should they have removed all Ancient technology from the Pegasus Galaxy after the second mass ascension event happened on Earth? If so, they're taking away tools that humans could find and obtain to help free themselves from the Wraith and potentially dooming them to eternal control by the Wraith. To prevent that they have to go beyond just cleaning up their toys; they have to actively decide to let one life form live in freedom over another.
Okay, some others also do, although there's so much more to the Ancients than the negative impressions that they've given some viewers.
Go back to SG1 and you'll get a much better understanding of the Ancients.
During Atlantis, that particular group was admittedly not at their best. Flaws are what make great characters, they even make entire races great.
I especially hate the way Elizabeth
...well, I'm with you there, in general about Weir. Although, I can't stand her, more specifically: I can't stand Higginson's version of her. The other women who played the role did a great job, but that's another topic.
The Ancients really do have so much to teach us. Again, watch SG1. The Ancients in SGA are from the same race in SG1. We're talking about descendants / ascendants but, still, same race. All with their own ups and downs.
The smoke monster - a great example of how the scientists (Lanteans/Lantians) had flaws. It is awesome.
They did not intend for anybody to find the city-ship, hence plummeting it to the bottom of the ocean.
The nanite virus - same thing. Another great example of their flaws, which is what makes them an awesome race.
Just imagine how incredibly boring the race would be if they had no flaws.
The Tao of Rodney machine. Same thing.
These are the things that really make SGA a great show. Well, some of the things.
but do the Ancients care? Nope.
That's not true.
Again, they were flaws. Maybe some of them didn't care, although it's clear that overall they cared. More likely is that things were left behind and forgotten, or records lost that led to being forgotten.
The list goes on, with the examples you discussed, but also many more. These are some of the things that make Stargate Atlantis shine as a series.
but were they the least bit grateful? No, they were not.
Again, that's not true.
Get into their minds, see things from their points of view, and that's not how those events played out. Although they are a race that ultimately ended up leading to the human race (go back to SG1 for that), ultimately they are a separate race, given that while both are humanoid each has a different origin. (Although, I've theorized that even that's the same, if we could've seen more of SGU, I'm guessing it would've revealed that we all share the same origin.)
reply share
The Ancients of SG-1 were what I hoped to see: an advanced, altruistic, and enlightened people that humans should aspire to be.
Unfortunately, the more you show such a magnificent precursor race, the likelihood that they will be portrayed as jerks keeps increasing. "Less is better" and all that.
What we ended up getting in Atlantis were these unbearable techno-snobs with perhaps one or two decent members within their entire population.
--- It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing .