MovieChat Forums > Mysterious Skin (2005) Discussion > Why wasn't levitt nominated for a Oscar

Why wasn't levitt nominated for a Oscar


Brilliant acting

reply

He should have been, but I've come to learn that there are always going to be snubs at awards shows. I wouldn't be surprised if the content of the film turned off a lot of the Academy voters, actually, as they tend to be quite stuffy.

--
'I was very shocked when my son told me his boyfriend was a homosexual.'

reply

Bet they've never even heard of this exquisite piece of work.

reply

Brilliant performances in this film. It was greatly overlooked :(

reply

[deleted]

I don't know if it was a deliberate snub, it could be the case that he just wasn't put forward and didn't campaign for it.

That said I do think it was Oscar worthy, his performance was so haunting and he inhabited the role so completely it was unnerving.

reply


Very simple. To put it plainly, the Academy powers are composed of cowardly wusses. Gordon-Levitt actually deserved the award.



"Believe not what you only wish to believe, but that which truth demands"

reply

[deleted]

already had Brokeback Mountain's Ledger in the running

icheckmovies: IMDb vote history-compatible movielist host

reply

Even if that were a legitimate reason (it's not), Brokeback Mountain was released in 2005 and didn't make an appearance at the Oscars until 2006. Mysterious Skin was released in 2004, therefore would have been in the running for the '05 awards.

--
My middle name is ready. No, that doesn't sound right. I eat ready for breakfast.

reply

you would think that, but the cinemas received it in 2005

icheckmovies: IMDb vote history-compatible movielist host

reply

Truly deserved to be nominated at the very least.

reply

I think it's because Mysterious Skin is considered to be an 'india film', and the Academy never nominates indie films or people who have starred in them or worked on them. They always seem to want to exclude independent cinema for some reason.

reply

Crash and Platoon both won best picture and were independent films. It was because of two reasons: 1. Not many Oscar voters saw it and 2. It's subject matter.

Joseph Chastainme
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Marks-the-series/806493646056177

reply

[deleted]

Not true. They clearly snob them often but not all the time. Hilary Swank, Holly Hunter and Melissa Leo come to mind.

reply