How? Just How?

That is still up for debate. Most agree that the Ginger and Bridget from the previous films are reincarnations in a sense of the ones in this movie, or descendants of Bridget. Some think that is what the reference to the curse being passed is implying. Yet others (myself included) wonder if maybe instead of the human line continuing through Bridget the werewolf line keeps going through Ginger, perhaps she started the strain that created the werewolf who attacks and turns the Ginger incarnation in the first movie.

I hope this kind of helps and doesn't just confuse you more.



The only difference between fiction and reality is that fiction has to make sense.

Also, the natives talk about thier beliefs in reincarnation, that might be why.

The girls in this movie are obviously different people with the same names. Duh.

It's open for debate.

Some people subscribe to the theory that the Ginger and Bridgette from the original film are the reincarnations of the Ginger and Bridgette from this film.

Some people believe that the Ginger and Bridgette from the original film are somehow descended from or related to the ones from this film. (Or that the werewolf is.)

Some people I've talked to have said they just see this film as a "What If?" or re-imagining of the original film, and don't consider it to be in the same continuity.

Etc.

Really, you can just believe whatever it is that floats your boat in this case, because the film isn't very clear about it. (And tbh, the film isn't clear about a lot of things. They mentioned a few things in the commentary that were supposedly alluded to that I never picked up on. I think the film doesn't work particularly well, especially with any thought or scrutiny put in.)

And FURTHERMORE, this is my signature! SERIOUSLY! Did you think I was still talking about my point?