MovieChat Forums > Dawn of the Dead (2004) Discussion > 28 Days Later (2002) vs Dawn of the Dead...

28 Days Later (2002) vs Dawn of the Dead (2004)

posted 2 years ago by [deleted]
12 replies | jump to latest

Which early 00s zombie flick is best?

[–] Kowalski (76257) 2 years ago

28 DAYS LATER IS A BETTER MOVIE...THE DAWN OF THE DEAD REMAKE ENTERTAINS ME MORE THOUGH...I HAVE REWATCHED IT WAY MORE THAN 28 DAYS LATER.

[–] alexjohans0n (2094) 2 years ago

Both Amazing! Both different films. Dawn for me.

[–] DoctorThirteen (14196) a year ago

Gotta go with 28DL.

[–] TerraFirma69 (2269) a year ago

Not one reply admonishing you for calling 28 Days Later a zombie movie. What's your secret?

[–] AviAAksenazi (669) a year ago

Dawn of the Dead

[–] kenburke (2377) 9 months ago

Apples and oranges!!!

[–] [deleted] 9 months ago

28 days later is a better movie. Dawn of the dead is fun. But choosing to leave the mall didn't make sense.

[–] mechajutaro (2788) 9 months ago

Nor did failing to show Sarah Polley in the buff, despite putting her in a shower scene

[–] [deleted] 9 months ago

No thanks. She's not my type.

[–] mechajutaro (2788) 9 months ago

She's definitely smacked face first into the wall today. Back then, she was still cute

[–] [deleted] 9 months ago

Lol. Great imagery

[–] TheHardSell (1767) 9 months ago

Dawn of the Dead (2004)