No, because it seems Sir Timothy didn't murder anyone, even if the things he did were the cause of the murders - I don't know how the charge could be brought against him, which may explain why the team was so happy laying their final report on Bevin.
This episode establishes that Risk was murdered by someone acting on George Wilson's orders. Sir Timothy was likely going to be the next one murdered, which is why and when he stole the real painting to replace the fake one Wilson had purchased (the real one still in possession of Wilson's widow.)
So the possible charges the team states for Bevin to sort out were:
Theft (Sir Timothy)
Fraud (Sir Timothy/Risk/gallery owner(?))
Arson (Wilson/unknown accomplice(?))
Attempted murder x 2 (Wilson/accomplice)
Lying to the police (Sir Timothy)
Attempting to pervert the course of justice (Sir Timothy)
Misappropriation of funds (Sir Timothy)
Theft of national assets (Sir Timothy)
Tampering with evidence (Sir Timothy)
Treason (Sir Timothy)
Still, it was a confusing episode. For me one weak point was it's hard to believe Sir Timothy, initiating the investigation, denied knowing Risk. It would have been an innocent enough statement to admit studying art with Risk, and even admitting the man had a talent to create while he was more suited to the appreciation of art. It would also have allowed him to show a professional and personal interest in the case without giving up anything.
reply
share