hi is it worth seeing with put having seen part 1? and is there anything key you need to know?
thanks
watch the first movie first.
that one was the best
aka.kryptkeeper226-maliciouslove-hannahSNAPS
the first one is good too. Don't listen to the guy who said it wasn't. I've seen one and two and both left me thinking that Canadians must be genius to take such small budgets and make such great horror movies.
share[deleted]
You have to watch part 1 if you want to understand the movie.
Glen Coco is my luffer.
No, I don´t think so. I saw the second part yesterday and it is years ago since I saw the first one. To be honest, I wasn´t too impressed with that one, although it was quite good (7 points), and so I couldn´t remember very much from it.
Nonetheless the second film absolutely made sense to me and in my opinion is better than the first part. I gave it 8 points. Obviously it´s preferrable to know the first part but even as a stand-alone "Ginger Snaps: Unleashed" works pretty good.
All three movies are worth seeing.
All three have different aspects to them, different atmospheres and depth that make them all stand alone movies.
You can watch all three alone and still understand what is going on. All you really need to know for all three is that Ginger and Bridgitte are sisters, Ginger gets bitten first and is the firt one the curse hits, Ginger is sassier and bossier than B (the stronger, older sister), monkhood is the cure for the lycanthropy, and that B is shyer and more of a loner than Ginger.
That's all you really need to know for all three, all which you can pick up on your own really.
I like to think of each movie as separate, because they're all fundamentally good.