These three ladies were all phenomenal on this show. Three of my favorite TV performances by far!
Ellen Muth, Callum Blue, Jasmine Guy and many of the other cast members were great as well but my top three are the above mentioned ladies.
I refuse to watch the POS movie follow up that couldn't even wait to get Laura Harris back. By all accounts it sounds like a disaster and I don't want it tarnishing my image of the 2 bittersweet seasons of the series.
It's annoying when parents watch things over your shoulder, but we must endure.
It seems that Harris was not approached about the Movie and if she had been she likely would have said no. Just my impression from reading her comments in interviews on the matter.
Harris IMO could have been cut from the movie with no major loss. I liked her character and her place in the reaper gang, but the main story involved George and Reggie, and someone left off your list, Mandy as Rube. Rube, or Mandy, of course was deeply involved with the hit 'Criminal Minds' and using him wasn't an option, but his absence was a major hurdle to bringing closure to the set up we were left with at the end of S2.
As it was we did get to see in the Movie an abbreviated get together between George and Reggie but it needed an S3 and Rube to do it right.
Based on the hints and evidence in left thru-out S2 and even reaching back into S1, the PTB wanted George and Rube to influence each other. The wild card was Reggie, who in S3 would have been pursuing/tracking down her sister. The former interaction was intended and brought about by the PTB, but the latter was not and what they might have done about it would have been fun to watch. The Movie as flawed as it delivered the end meeting between the sisters without the build up and without Rube's very important role.
The others were supporting the main plot lines and helping define the George character and her situation.
Christine as Delores I suspect evolved into an essential reminder - ironic and humorous because she's always telling George that she has her whole life ahead of her - to us the audience that George is undead and doesn't have to worry about her life.
Both Mason and Daisy were used to tell us in various ways that the reapers are stuck in a purgatory and have no life ahead. Remember that scene in which Mason on what he thinks is his last day offers Daisy the ring.
If we had gotten more seasons we would have likely had some tantalizing contact between George and Joy and perhaps Joy and Rube.
Joy and Rube had met that one time in the therapist's waiting room, a very nice scene, and I really liked what he said to her about the African tribe and their spirit dance. I was hoping they would follow up on that but it looks like they didn't...
I've read quite a few of your posts about the show, and you often refer to the PTB: is the Upper Management represented by anyone in particular or just suggested by the interweaving of events? Just curious as I still haven't received Season 2 yet #%@***!!!
"What is the law? Not to eat meat - are we not men?"
That scene in the therapist's office is what I had in mind. I also wondered whether she remembered him from George's funeral reception in her home when he was escorting George's newly dead soul around.
If you've been reading around then you've already seen a lot of spoilers,.....
This show has some currents running quietly below the surface. Rube in that therapist's office told Joy about the African tribe. He often brings up obscure customs and religious practices drawn from equally obscure tribes and peoples, but when he is confronted with his own religious background - he seems Jewish but anything Christian too - he gets upset if not outright angry.
When George gets upset he often falls back on telling her about something only found in a dusty tome somewhere, which she usually rejects - in the S202 she called his talk 'b*llsh*t'. And to bring this odd behavior to our attention notice how Rube reacts badly whenever Daisy brings up her Catholic religious pursuit (the necklace with the cross). And notice how after she abandons her cross and her religion fad he warms up to her, and they go on a reap together to a school. And they're so buddy buddy that they pretend to be father and daughter no less!!!!
As his backstory was revealed in later seasons we likely would have found out what happened to him that brought about that odd behavior.
It's likely that if things had continued into a S3/4/5 the writers would not have passed up the opportunity to have Rube and Joy cross paths again.
PTB refers to the Powers That Be and was coined by someone a long time ago in now dead and deleted forums in which numerous fans gathered to discuss the show. Notice that it's never mentioned in the show and in fact it stands out and is really curious that the reapers never mention by any name the power(s) that are directing them day to day to do specific reaps. A lot of ambiguity. The upper management reference was in the pilot and that's about it.
Despite this the PTB become very prominent as an entity pulling strings unseen and unreferenced to make things happen. The living have free will and oddly so do the reapers. They are physically constrained - e.g. they can't travel and there are ambiguous rules governing interaction with the living, but they can make choices.
One of the most frequent occurrences is each reap which we are told repeatedly Rube does not choose who gets what. Deciding which reaper gets which reap is done by a power above himself and cannot be changed. That implies that higher power has reasons for its decisions.
If the PTB decide which reaper goes with a particular reap - no exceptions - then it's no great leap to see that deciding where each reaper is placed is done for their own reasons for their own goals.
Now, this aspect doesn't really grab our attention until Rube gets that envelope filled with cash in S2. He is very upset that he got it back but remarkably incurious as to why he got it back. This show was engaging enough before the envelope, but that envelope and why he got it back takes the show to a higher level and changes everything we thought was clear way back to S1 the pilot and forces reconsideration of all the plot pathways.
Rube did not know that the envelope had been diverted. The PTB must have known what he was doing, diverted it - for 80 years no less, but took no action against his transgressions (now that's patience!).
Then they give it back to him, which upsets him and sets him predictably on a new course of action, which will likely bring about more transgressions against rules constraining reapers i.e. contacting living family members.
The envelope also forces us to consider again, if we hadn't been thinking along these lines already, why was George placed so near her own family (why not in London? or NY?) under the supervision of a reaper who himself had earlier problems fighting rules against interacting with living family?
By the end of S2 we get a partial answer to the above questions, but there is plenty of evidence and hints scattered thru-out that the writers were prepared to take the tension level up a few notches as Reggie, George, and Rube got intertwined before we got to the meeting between George and Reggie.
That's the value of the Movie. As flawed as it was in execution it was written by the two primary writers post Fuller who altho they did not have control probably tried to put in that final meeting between the sisters that should have been achieved over at least one if not more seasons of TV.
The movie lost any potential interest I could have had in it by recasting a central character. It shows they genuinely didn't give a *beep* about continuity or pleasing the fans. I'm perfectly happy with the end of the second season. The movie doesn't exist as far as I'm concerned. It was bad enough when Fuller got strong armed out of the first season. Then they're gonna make a movie that even further tarnishes his creation? I'll pass.
I recommend you approach the Movie with lowered expectations looking for the good points and ignoring the flaws.
No one from the executives to the writers and people doing make up want to make a bad product. It's just hard to get everything to come together successfully, which is why people who can more often than not tend to attract considerable compensation.
Anyway in the whole Fuller getting strong armed out episode there's plenty of blame to go around. On the part of MGM execs responsible for green lighting Fuller's DLM pilot as a series, they should never have allowed him to go solo given he had zero experience managing an operation of several ten's of millions of dollars in budget before. His obvious creative genius was not the issue. He didn't have the skillset and experience to move his ideas from his brain to the screen efficiently i.e. low cost. He may now, but he didn't then, and that lesson was an expensive one for everyone including fans who would have liked to see where he would have taken the Dead Like Me series.
Fuller also seems to have thought the money was limitless and didn't listen when ample warning was sent his way. The MGM guys at that time were under intense pressure to cut costs and they were soon taken over by outside management, and they simply didn't have the room to allow a creative genius to burn thru budget money they didn't have.
So, Fuller lost his job, and many of them lost theirs.
As far as the Movie 'further' tarnishing his creation, keep in mind he left at episode four. Five was a transition to get Betty out with a sendoff as they retooled. Godchaux (Masius) took over creative oversight, and IMO didn't tarnish the creation. We simply don't know what Fuller would have done. We can see what they did and it was pretty good.
The Movie remember altho they wrote it they did not have creative control. By the time the Movie was thought of in 2005/6 MGM was heading towards another bankruptcy (notice a pattern?) and this was not a Firefly/Serenity/Joss Whedon situation with centralized control and continuity. The director as far as I can tell had no more than a superficial appreciation - not much better than those plot summaries on the DVD covers - of the series and it shows.
I find it really hard to believe that Godchaux/Masius did not and why they did not could not communicate more to the director is one of those unanswered mysteries.
Certainly the mishandling of the recasting of that central character is up front and obvious. But it goes deeper. Even if they found another slender blond with acting talent (no shortage of those in S CA) who could replicate believably the original Daisy the lines/plotting/scenes didn't work.
And then this Movie Daisy it turns out can't handle acting on stage and says she's never done it, but in Ep 206 'In Escrow' Daisy and George had a relaxed conversation at home in which we learn that Daisy has extensive experience doing Shakespeare on stage. If in getting ready for the Movie the writers and director just rewatched the series once how could they move forward with a key plot twist that had Daisy unable to perform basic lines of Shakespeare on stage? Anyway, think positive, think positive......
Thank you for more insight into Fuller and the later writers' respective situations (assuming it's all accurate).
However, your later paragraphs do nothing to further the idea that I should watch the movie. I HATE recasting in general. I would have been displeased no matter who they would have gotten to replace Laura Harris. The fact that she was a poor actress only makes matters worse. Unless people are willing to accept the replacement of an actress between shots or scenes in a movie/series, they shouldn't be willing to accept the change between episodes. It's a big sloppy error that could have been avoided.
Like I said, I'm happy with the finale of the series and the fact that you're admitting the film isn't very good (even if it's not totally the writers' fault) makes me want to avoid it all the more, despite the possibility that there may be a handful of bright spots in it.
I didn't say if you watched the Movie you wouldn't feel a little pain, just that the pain was bearable to get the good parts.
Also please don't misunderstand. I didn't say that the Daisy replacement - Sarah Wynter - was a 'poor actress'. Sarah just couldn't believably replace Laura Harris and to make it worse if you listen to/read interviews she didn't try and/or wasn't directed to do so.
My point is that even if you found someone who could be Daisy more convincingly there's a much deeper problem with the way the character was written. I don't believe Laura Harris could have done the character as written.
It's now very unlikely that the story we saw in S1&2 will ever get picked up and finished in any form. It's possible that it will get a reboot with a new reaper group in a different location and set in the same DLM universe. Cameos are getting tough tho given actors age and reapers don't.
Where did you learn all this about budget issues? I read he left himself, one reason because some MGM workers were extremely homophobic to him, another being Rebecca's firing etc.
As far as budget issues, I looked at MGM's last public financial statements in 2004 before they were taken over by a group of private equity investors led by Sony in September of 2004. Something I posted back in Jan of 07:
MGM net losses in 2001 totaled $56 mil (ignoring $382 mil in losses due to an accounting change) on revenues of $1.4 bil. Losses continued in 02 at $142 mil ($1.7 bil), 03 at $162 mil ($93 mil due to asset write offs) ($1.9 bil), and 04 at $29 mil ($1.7 bil). DLM was put together in 02, 03 and early 04 – a period of intense pressure on MGM’s financial resources and management people.
In view of fact that TV series create a significant cash deficit up front with breakeven and pay back years away and somewhat speculative, it is remarkable that DLM got made during this period. And it’s no wonder that Fuller, when he apparently couldn’t keep costs contained, got removed after just four episodes. Later when Showtime found itself running short due to cost overruns (?) MGM’s financial flexibility was nonexistent and management’s attention elsewhere.
So what was more likely - some Hollywood executives were prejudiced towards a gay showrunner? Or, they were p*ss*d that he couldn't get it thru his head the number one priority was to come within budget?
Why would they hire someone they almost certainly knew was gay and then fire him FOUR episodes later?
Removing a showrunner is dangerous. How many shows have ever survived that? They were lucky that Godchaux and Masius and others pulled it together to succeed with the rest of S1 and delivered a great S2.
Sony probably wanted control of MGM to make sure their movie library was kept out of the clutches of their Blu-ray rival Toshiba. Unfortunately because they failed to meet certain hurdles they lost control in 2006. Their partners brought in new management who either initiated or allowed to continue the DLM Movie. Unfortunately (again) financial difficulties continued to dog the company and they were taken over by their banks a few years later.
The Dead Like Me franchise is actually a proven one with - for its time - high ratings for Showtime and in syndication, but its owner has had almost continuous financial pressure since before its inception. And we haven't mentioned problems from the Showtime side - mostly a change of management.
Even with the Showtime lack of management support its more likely than not that a healthy MGM would have kept DLM going for a few more seasons - probably on another cable channel like SiFi.
Anyway Fuller was feeling a lot of pressure given that it was his first time as a showrunner and he had no significant management experience.
As for the tossing of the Betty character.....one reason given had to do with the incident in which Rebecca killed a child in an accident a few years before (they didn't know that before they hired her?), but more likely IMO is that after a few episodes it's clear that as likable as the character is the series needed a female in that slot that was a little less together. Fuller fought hard to keep Betty and ended up getting tossed out with her. That IMO was a bit foolish. The people providing several millions of dollars call the shots. And in retrospect the Daisy replacement turned out pretty well.
It's too bad MGM hasn't been in a financial position to exploit its ownership of a viable franchise that's a great alternative to (or relief from) the widespread vampires we see everywhere.
"So what was more likely - some Hollywood executives were prejudiced towards a gay showrunner? Or, they were p*ss*d that he couldn't get it thru his head the number one priority was to come within budget?
Why would they hire someone they almost certainly knew was gay and then fire him FOUR episodes later? "
To be fair, he said specifically he was talking about some people on the crew. not any head honchos or anyone in charge. And yeah there could be homophobic crew staff in Hollywood in the early noughties.....
I imagine it was true, but yeah maybe he got fired and it was unrelated.
They filmed in Canada. Willes and other Canadien actors, probably much of the crew was Canadien. It might have been better to film in Hollywood but would have been much more expensive.