I mean, no violence, no nudity, no bad language, no breasts shoots even in the sex scenes.
And bam.
Vagina shoot out of nowhere.
Back to no nudity no violence.
Not that im complaining, it was a really pretty vagina, but whats up with that ?
Also the movie was pretty bad.
Maybe if people weren't so distracted and looking for the "feel good mentality" (sex scenes) they might actually find some substance in a dystopian futuristic world.
Sex is such a tool, there should be "porn" and "non porn" and no in between for those who have no substance past voyeuristic minds.
I NEVER alphabetize my movies, but categorize them by genre. All mindless movies with sex & drugs have their own shelf. No, not a "freaky frigid girl" just one who puts her porn on a top shelf because there's a time and place for things, and out of the reach of any children that just MIGHT happen to want to see my movie collection, they cannot see the mindless drivel.
BTW, you might want to note for further knowledge, the vagina is inside a woman and not viewable unless it's a scan, otherwise it's just what you said a random "outside the vagina" shot. People who use words to describe female anatomy might want to make it at least appear that you've got a little something rattling around in there other than when you'll see the next sex shot on screen.
Good luck with that! lol.
-Kathy
What is your post about exactly ?
I stated a simple fact about the inconsistency of this movie in showing nudity, while you rave about few random things that happen to be on your mind and then try something i must assume to be some kind of passive aggressive insult ? As if if sex obsessed and only look for random boob shoots ?
You are one mayor twat, arent you ?
Anyway my point stands, what a weird ass random scene, couldnt take anything seriously about it.
I think you are going to a little bit of an extreme. The OP was simply stating that it's a little odd to show that, but no other nudity at all. It's sort of backwards. He wasn't comparing it to pornography, which you seemed to intimate.
As for the OP's terminology: it's not unusual for people to use the term vagina for pretty much any visual of lower nudity of a woman. Even when you just see pubic hair. Did you want him to say, "Nothing at all. No nudity, no violence, then BAM, the mons pubis and the very top of the labia majora!" Would that have been better? Give him a break.
And why in God's name did you even type your second paragraph? It has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand. Nothing. Does the OP's statement have anything to do with how you categorize your films? And does it have anything to do with your earlier statement about finding substance in a film about a futuristic, dystopian society? Going off the rails a little?
It was a simple observation. Nothing more. Not a critique on the categorization of films so porn will be out of the reach of children. Sheesh.
The plural of mouse is mice. The plural of goose is geese. Why is the plural of moose not meese?
I applaud you. I heartily agree with what you wrote in reply to itsmekat.
Thank you for posting!
Your prudish post about sex in movies does NOTHING to answer the original guy's question. You say "at least appear you've got something rattling around in your head". I suggest you follow your own advice, and try to FOCUS ON THE TOPIC and answer the dude's question, rather than post random non-connected ideas.
Reply to itmekat. You wrote,
Maybe if people weren't so distracted and looking for the "feel good mentality" (sex scenes) they might actually find some substance in a dystopian futuristic world.
And my question would be, why not?
Also the movie is in my top 10.
I wouldn't exactly call it random and out of nowhere. I mean, it was during a sex scene. It wasn't like they were eating their French fries in McDonald's and all of a sudden someone spliced in 24 frames of a vulva.
I understand what you are saying though. It is sort of strange to show no nudity, but that. That was definitely a little odd.
And of course, if you notice, you can tell that it's a body double and not Samantha Morton.
The plural of mouse is mice. The plural of goose is geese. Why is the plural of moose not meese?
Probably an allusion to the 'incest' seeing as genetically at least he was having sex with his mom.
shareWhat's really sick is that this happens after he already knows about the fact that she is a genetic duplicate. Pretty sick, eh? I know that she is different than his mother, because of various things, but it's still pretty sick. I guess it happens enough to have a name though, the Oedipus Complex.
Read about Oedipus and the Oedipus Complex. Pretty sick stuff.
The plural of mouse is mice. The plural of goose is geese. Why is the plural of moose not meese?
Freud was an uptight prude. Bet you 90% of men would have sex with their mum if she was hot and they hadn't been raised by her.
Although this does give you an insight into the prudish moralistic dictatorship running this future society.
If they didn't know, sure. If they did, Freud or not, it's disgusting and most men would consider it so. If you believe that most men would do it even after knowing, then my God, you have some VERY strange ideas, my friend. VERY strange. Really twisted. Perhaps you have an Oedipal Complex. And if Freud hadn't given a name to it, someone else would have, because no matter who you talk to, it's a sick idea.
The plural of mouse is mice. The plural of goose is geese. Why is the plural of moose not meese?
the idea is sick. the deed is just sex. split them and fvck away.
share