MovieChat Forums > Van Helsing (2004) Discussion > To bad no sequel

To bad no sequel

posted 2 years ago by millsey72 (10665)
6 replies | jump to latest

I like how this movie was able to stay faithful to the origins of Dracula, The Wolf Man and the Frankenstein Monster all in 1 movie

[–] HarlemEagle42 (18170) a year ago

The one thing I can see being a problem is tying all the remaining Universal monsters (Gill-Man, Phantom of the Opera, Invisible Man, the Mummy) together into a cohesive story. With this movie, at least it's kept simple (they're all minions or victims of Dracula).

[–] millsey72 (10665) 8 days ago

The Mummy and Gill Man could be put together plot wise, as the Mummys relics could be in a museum, and someone can bring him back to life. And have a crew out in the Lagoon trying to capture the Gill Man to put him in a museum.

[–] millsey72 (10665) 4 months ago

How could there be a sequel after Dracula was destroyed? How could he possibly come back?

[–] HarlemEagle42 (18170) 9 days ago

Why bring Dracula back though? There's other monsters they could use as the main villain.

[–] millsey72 (10665) 8 days ago

Like who?

[–] HarlemEagle42 (18170) 8 days ago

Like the Invisible Man or the Phantom. Maybe even the Bride of Frankenstein except she's the creation of Dr. Pretorious (since Dr Frankenstein is dead in this continuity).