First I would certainly agree that media is to a great extent responsible for what we find attractive. But as you pointed out, there are of course always trends as to what is attractive and they fluctuate throughout the ages. I also agree with you that older men date younger women because it is a symbol of their virility. But what you must remember is that evolution is not just the reason behind action it is also an explanation of those thoughts and actions. Beauty, in the eyes of man, is a sign of greater fertility. A woman who does not meet men’s standards of beauty is therefore seen as unattractive both as a mate and as a potential breeding partner, which is why there aren’t more men with ugly girls as you put it. Physical deformity, whether it is crooked teeth, or just an ugly face, has long been the way of quickly determining a woman’s beauty as well as potential in terms of birthing. One thing that cuts across all society is the beauty of a woman’s face. Body size may differ but what men consider a beautiful face does not. Men are attracted towards a combination of facial features that represent both child and adult like qualities on a woman. A smaller chin, larger eyes, more prominent cheek bones, etc…These are things that all men identify as attractive regardless of society, culture, media influence etc… and have been forever.
The same can be said of women too. Not many women are attracted towards homely or rotten looking men. I am not trying to instigate any conflict, but men too suffer from vanity and want to be attractive towards the opposite sex. Male anorexia and other eating disorders are rising at alarming rates as well, they may even be close to eclipsing females if not for that fact that amongst men it is little talked about let alone reported. I am not trying to make excuses for men or women. I simply started off this topic long ago by saying that there is a viable and logical explanation for why men find younger women, on the whole, to be more attractive. That explanation is evolutionary adaptation to best ensure the survival of the species. And as I have mentioned several times, evolution’s patterns are not set in stone. Reasons for attraction do indeed fluctuate, and we are responsible for them.
In regards to female infanticide, yes I had heard of the appalling situation in India. Of course much like in China, girls will simply be exposed and left to die. The reason for these practices is far too numerous and complex to undertake here, but I was aware of them none the less and am as perplexed as anyone else. It really makes it all the madder because it does threaten the survival of the people. But then again man, or woman, has never been the most rational animal in the forest. We must keep in mind than humankind is the only species that would willingly self terminate. So our limit for depravity and madness sadly knows no bounds.
Thank you for the debate. But I don’t think we disagree, I am simply saying there is some explanation for why we think or do what we do and that is evolution. And that is the goal and why I love to debate on such things. The more discussion we have the more answers to questions we might arrive at.
reply
share