MovieChat Forums > Angels in America (2003) Discussion > Angels In America is by far the WORST te...

Angels In America is by far the WORST television series of 2003!


Of course, some people are going to strongly dislike my review of this overrated miniseries, but so be it.

Angels In America, written by Tony Kusher, is by far the worst television miniseries of 2003.

The reason, first of all, the acting is atrocious, despite all of the "emmys" it won.

Secondly, Mr. Kushner, uses this miniseries, to blast Christians and conservatives alike, anyone who disagrees with his prisoner-takes-all, extremist approach to the birth of AIDS.

The AIDS virus actually started in the mid 1970's but didn't catch on until years later.

This miniseries blames the American government for the spread of this disease, and anyone who dares disagree with it's point of view is viewed as a close minded bigot.

Today, there are over ten million people around the world currently affected with the HIV virus, however, is that the fault of the America government?!

No, it's not! I'm sorry, but the only close minded person is playwright, Tony Kushner, whose support of communism in the 1990s got him blacklisted from many college campuses.

The AIDS virus claimed more lives during the Bill Clinton administration than any other time in it's history. He also signed the highly controversial Defense of Marriage Act of 1996.

However, Mr. Kushner often claims Clinton as a champion of gay rights.

That's why I view Tony Kushner as a hypocrite.

That is the reason why this miniseries is so awful and close minded.

I'm sorry if some people disagree with my opinion, but I'm entitled to it!

reply

Who's an Angel in all this? Seems like a bag of nuts to me...

reply

[deleted]

Riiiiiiiiiight...You didn't like the acting...and I am from Mars.

Sans toi, les émotions d'aujourd'hui ne seraient que la peau morte des émotions d'autrefois.

reply

In every single forum, there are stupid morons like you saying "that" movie or the tv series is the worst they've ever seen...

are you guys such members of a particular club called "We waste our times", or something like that?


reply

[deleted]

Ten million? And the rest - add at least several more millions. Think of Africa, China, India......Most of those countries don't even let statistics out.

reply

Oh you are a Christian conservative??!

reply

The complete opposite! I was trying to say that HIV is a far bigger issue than the poster said. It is largely ignored in many countries - for stupid political reasons - and is a time bomb in many countries such as India. Many people think it's an American issue affecting gays - when in fact the majority of people with HIV are heterosexuals and children in the underdeveloped world.

reply

All of your political views aside, you apparently know NOTHING about true art. Have you ever even heard of metaphor... or symbolism?

Try to look a little deeper because you completely missed Kushner's point.

reply

I also did not like this movie. I tried twice to watch it but it was just dumb. Now mind you I like artsy films and have seen a number of films that most find difficult to watch. "Dancer in the Dark", "Lumumba", "The Crying Game", but this movie was just going no where. I think it also is because I do not like the acting or the portrayal of gays. I've just about had it with gay guys acting superfemme in every movie as if that's how you know he's gay. Movies about gays or that attack certain aspects portions of religious culture. I think religious culture needs to be examined and have the parts that are not in line with the actual text need to be removed. I don't quite get all the awards it was given either but I also thought "Gladiator" should never have won anything. Maybe if this movie was made 10-15 years ago I would have said it was better because the story of the spread of HIV was almost unknown and still is to most people, meaning how it spread so fast and why among the gay male population and the lack of interest the government had in even acknowledging it existed. I think "...and the Band Played On" as well as "Tales from the City" did much better jobs at detailing these aspects of American society.

reply

[deleted]

Right! You need peels man! Petty you

reply

whether you want to realize it or not, Reagan DID kind of ignore AIDS at first. I'm not blaming him for the spread of the disease or saying he's evil and blatantly ignored it the entire time, but when AIDS was first becoming epidemic, he didn't pay much attention. That's just the simple truth.

reply

Okay, I rented this series and I am only into the first 15 minutes of Part 2, but seeing this thread I had to read what kind of BS was on parade. First of all, I am 17 and was not around during the 80s like most commenting here were. I don't think anyone who was under 13 during the 80s has any real "clout," as Roy would say, on this thread regarding "how things were" politically and sexually during the 80s. I can however comment on the movie itself. I agree, where the heck was there any political attacks against Clinton or the proof regarding the first poster's allegations? And on the subject of the acting, it's blasphemous to say the acting was bad. Given the context of the movie series and what these people had to convince themselves of, of course it was good acting. I'll say some bits were a bit "much", such as Al Pacino as Roy, but Al Pacino is a bit much. However, when you see how he is while others are speaking or when he must underplay the role, he is brilliant. Meryl Streep is Meryl Streep, brilliant as always, and funny. Emma Thompson is always wonderful, and I quite enjoy her as the nurse and the homeless woman. The angel is, a bit much, too. But still, I haven't seen all of the angel scenes, so i can only comment on Part 1. I think Mary Louise Parker plays a very good woman-with-emotional-problems. I like how she is living in the freezer right now. Belize the Nurse, Prior's pal, is one of my favorites and I love his exchange with Roy on Roy's first night in the hospital. Prior is amazing and reminds me of a better-looking Jack from Will and Grace in his fearless attitude. I also enjoyed seeing "Dumbledore" doing a Metratron (Alan Rickman from Dogma) impression.

I understand much of Part 1, but wonder what exactly the Antarctica scenes are meant to be with MLP. So much of the movie is realistic, then suddenly giant Bibles are erupting through the floor for Prior. For me, it keeps me entertained. Otherwise, I might feel bogged down. For me, the miniseries is brilliant in that way that The Pianist or Schindler's List or Passion of the Christ was: you don't watch it again. You don't pop in Passion of the Christ for Easter or Christmas. You watch it once and that's good enogh. For me, Angels In America is a very brilliant movie with wonderful acting that is powerful and has something to say about America, but is not some excellent movie that one wants to watch every other week. Personally, I preferred Something the Lord Made with Alan Rickman and Mos Def. I thought that it had a lot more to say and also, because of their acting, was a lot more entertaining and because they stood alone as the two actors of the movies deserving awards, they shined. I would agree that there is too much talent in AiA and that Alan Rickman by far outshined Al Pacino, and that Pacino only won the major awards because he is a bigger name and played a role he has never done before and it shocked everyone. When he was asking voters to "Say hello to my little friend," he was referring to his life partner, a far cry from The Godfather or Scent of A Woman.

reply

"
The AIDS virus actually started in the mid 1970's but didn't catch on
until years later. "

Are you sure it was not 1951?

reply