MovieChat Forums > House of the Dead (2003) Discussion > Not that bad at all

Not that bad at all

posted 15 years ago by WingMaker
6 replies | jump to latest

This does not belong in the bottom 100 nor even the bottom 1000!

I enjoyed this a lot more than Romero's Land of the Dead (2005) & Diary of the Dead (2007) plus Juan Carlos Fresnadillo's 28 Weeks Later (2007) all combined.

And in the land of bad movies it was way better than Zombie Strippers! (2008).

With some fine tuning and minor adjustments it would have been apart from the good bad movies.

Ona Grauer alone makes it a must see... Actually she was the reason i finally watched it since i always wanted to check it out based on the trailer i saw years ago and she caught my eyes and now after seeing it, It is really not that bad at all.

And with some fine tuning and minor adjustments it would have been good actually with out even spending one more dime.

[–] Leo_Kinoske 15 years ago

No. This movie was just plain horrible. Nothing can fix the damage done to the thousands who watched.

~~~~~~ ZULU!

[–] Nwbcat51 15 years ago

I cant believe you really think that. This is BY FAR the worst movie I have ever seen. This is the only movie I have ever said that about.

[–] StarroHeart 15 years ago

I agree with you, WingMaker. "House of the Dead" wasn't that bad of a movie. It was a movie BASED ON A VIDEOGAME that was about zombies. That right there tells you it isn't gonna be for high-brow viewing. I think it fulfilled its pre-established requirements nicely. And for those of you who really think this is the worst movie, check out, "Rise of the Undead", "Zombie Night" or "Zombiez".

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]

[–] David_Bro 15 years ago

I thought the movie was fun. But I was not expecting anything special when I watched it.

I would rather see this movies than Diary of the Dead. I liked Land of the Dead.

[–] 15 years ago

[deleted]