OK it was bad but..


not as bad as I expected. It was at least watchable for the most part, though the computer game clips were really annoying. Ive seen far worse movies than this, usually ones Roger Corman produced.
Anybody else feel sorry for Jurgen Prochnow? From Das Boot to this.

reply

Yes, I've seen worse as well. But non as bad that were given a national theatrical release.

reply

I didnt know it got a theatrical release and so yeah, it is the worst I've seen to have gotten that sort of release. I sort of liked it as a direct to dvd piece of rubbish but if I'd gone out to a cinema and spent $15 to see it I would of felt ripped off.

reply

lol i actually saw this in the theater.. we just sat there lookin at each other like "is this real? is this a joke? are we on candid camera?"



but then again, i'm not so sure, lol - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tjvxWU01qSA

reply

[deleted]

house of the dead 2: the scifi original was an upgrade

reply

[deleted]

Worst. Zombie movie. Ever.

Usually the only movies worse than this one are the OTHER movies directed by Uwe Boll. haha

reply

^^ have you seen diary of the dead or zombie lake or invisible dead

reply

maggotman you have no idea how bad zombie movies get if you think this one is the worst.

reply

[deleted]

If you want bad zombie films then check out Autumn, that makes this a masterpiece.

I only axed ya for a smoke - Jack Frost

reply

I think that opinion was correct. Alone in the dark sucked ass homepaired to house of the dead. 1/10 to 4/10 (in my opinion, but I found the flaws in this hilarious. I almost had a heart attack at the technoflashback scene!)

reply

Lol looking back in this thread, read this post and thought "OMG, I completely agree with this comment" - read the posters username and realised I posted on ><.

reply

There is no but.
This whole "movie" was nothing but visual diarrhoea.

reply