So were they supposed to be the same age because I thought they made a cute couple, but since they looked exactly the same age it didn't seem weird to me that'd she'd be dating him even though he was her coach?
share[deleted]
That's the same thing I figured.
shareI don't think so. I assumed that Jess was supposed to be around 17-18, while Joe was in his mid 20's.
~*~*~
Seth Cohen: I'm allergic, and there's so much pollen in here right now. It's ridiculous.
I don't think that's weird, actually. Cause Joe didn't look that old to be Jess's boyfriend.
And I figured that Jess's age was around 17-18 and Joe's was early 20's.
I don't think that's a big problem.
I can't believe Parmander was 26 in this when all the other girls were about 20
shareI thought Jess was 18 and Joe 22-24 or so.
================
4) You ever seen Superman $#$# his pants? Case closed.
I think Jess is supposed to be 17 or 18 and Joe is supposed to be early to mid 20's, like 22 or 23.
This is my signature.
I assumed 18 for her (finished school, they go to a bar) and early 20s for him, which is why I didn't feel it was too weird.
I actually didn't realise that the male actor was in his late 20s at the time, though - then again, so was the actress. Both looked younger.
They looked close in age because they are in real life there 2 years apart with her being the older of the two (she was like 27 at the time of filming/release and he was 25).
share