While he 'technically' may have been 'outranked' by a lt, or a captain, as a Command Sergeant Major, in the chain of command he answered *only to LT Col Moore*. (And Moore's superiors) Col Moore didn't just say that, that's how it is.
In 1965, the grade of "Command" Sergeant Major did not exist.
Plumley was one of the senior Sergeants-Major in the Army. He and Moore served together as Sergeant-Major and Commander for over two years at Fort Benning and in Vietnam.
Plumley made all four combat jumps with the 82nd Airborne in World War II and one in Korea. One of a handful of living men to receive three awards of the Combat Infantryman's Badge, the list of his awards and decorations, starting with two Silver Stars, fill half a page - typed single space.
When the Department of the Army created the rank of Command Sergeant Major, the first promotion board reviewed the eligible population of Sergeants Major in three increments with a promotion list being published at the conclusion of each increment. CSM Plumley was on the promotion list published at the conclusion of the third increment and promoted 1968.
To this day, there are veterans of the 1/7 CAV who are convinced that God may look like CSM Plumley, but HE is not nearly as tough as the Sergeant Major on sins small or large.
So to answer your question, yes. He would have been able to talk to a lt. like that, and get away with it. It's not really insubordination, it was his, no s**t, way of saying respect goes both ways. He was telling the new guys, that respect comes from experience.
reply
share