Partially true.
The thing is, 'inner beauty' (whatever that means, actually - that you look skinny, though you are really fat? What? Shouldn't it be something like 'kindness', instead?) is not important for attraction, mating, sex, hugging, kissing, passion, or even romance.
It's only important when it comes to long-term-relationships, and even then you'll probably notice that women mostly don't have it - no matter if they are ugly or pretty on the outside.
It's almost opposite to this movie's message anyway - when women are young, fertile, bubbly and happy, they are more pleasant and joyful to be around. But when they hit the wall, lose their beauty, radiance and become just another wrinkly-faced tub of lard-aunt with a bulldog-face in the crowd, they become vicious, spiteful, resentful, hateful and completely impossible to be with.
I wouldn't even say there is any 'inner beauty', because it's too vague a concept (and this movie says that 'inner beauty' looks a lot like 'outer beauty' anyway), and is not clearly defined. It's basically what ugly people say.
There's beauty - and there's kindness. An ugly man can be kind, and beautiful woman can be nasty. But I wouldn't say that the man has 'inner beauty' or that the woman has 'inner ugliness'. That's just muddying the waters.
Let's call beauty just beauty, and then use appropriate words for the other qualities (that have nothing to do with any visuals), and keep things simple and clear - instead of gimmicky and confusing.
So, there is no inner beauty, so it can't be important.
Kindness, empathy, sympathy, caring, friendliness, respect and warmth towards others are important, especially in long-term-relationships, and not only intimate ones, but other kinds as well. But let's not call it 'beauty' - let's leave THAT word for the VISUAL things - which is what the word is supposed to refer to anyway (otherwise it wouldn't need a qualification word preceding it).
reply
share