I completely agree with you. Haneke's work is not gratuitous in the nasty visuals, which is why I love it. Implied actions or events are so much better than taking a Saw-like approach and showing everything. Because then I look away from the screen and it's a wasted effort. I hate torture porn, and though Haneke's work has a lot of disturbing events, he does not make us watch the gory details. They are unnecessary and actually less effective in my opinion.
I also agree with you that what makes his work have so much more of an impact is despite his lack of showing everything, his films are so realistic. His camera use and lack of soundtrack allow us to easily forget we are watching a movie. There are no fancy cuts or movements of the camera, and a lot of continuous stationary positions. This makes us think we are watching something happening in front of us. Irreversible did the same in its most horrifying scene. Lack of soundtrack also makes us forget we are watching a movie, because 99% of movies use it. His movies take us out of our element, and he doesn't need to show us even a drop of blood to get to us.
Haneke drives me absolutely nutty in every one of his films. But I love him! They are probably the most realistic of any films I have scene. Also, not a lot of action occurs, and they are somewhat long, but yet I somehow cannot take my eyes off the screen! He's a genius. :-)
reply
share