I really enjoyed the movie Serendipity (maybe because it was one of the first movies my wife and I saw together while we were in the early stages of dating. Coincidence???) But I am confused why the film does not have a higher rating. I see on some threads people have it rated in their top ten romantic comedies, I scrolled through about the first five pages of threads and did not come across any that were titled like "worse movie ever" or "top ten reasons why I think this movie sucks." I have not looked at how the score voting was broken down yet but plan to do that after this post. Anyways, just trying to add up the factors and understand why this only has a 6.5 rating. Anyone else in the same boat?
Possibly a difference of opinion some liked it and some didnt...maybe the immature and annoying people that post threads such as THIS MOVIE SUCKED are not interested in posting on this board. Also maybe the reason for the low voting...is due to lack of people whom have voted so far and those who have have only given it a mediocre score?
It was an incredibly bad movie. Bad scripting and direction. A lot of wasted talent. And it did not look like an inexpensive movie. The money could have been better spent feeding the poor.
This movie had a great first 15 minutes, and the last half hour (minus the nonsense of them flying cross country to San Francisco and planning on being back by 9:00 the next morning) was pretty OK, too. But the "missed by a fraction" of coincidences in the middle 45 minutes got a bit tiring. That's the whole section where they're "apart" and sort-of, maybe, kind-of trying to connect with each other. This was better done in "Sleepless in Seattle", for instance.
I disagree that the direction was poor; there are several moments where the direction absolutely *makes* the movie. As she leaves the carriage with Lars, there's a follow-on shot, and at the last minute the camera rises with a reveal of the skating rink. That's great stuff. Kate Beckinsale's performance as she breaks into the wedding ("STOP") is terrific, and the set-up scene for the entire movie (simultaneously grabbing the gloves in Bloomingdale's) is about as well done as can be expected.
There are some weak moments, but overall I'd give the movie slightly positive marks; maybe a 7 or 8. The weakness in a couple of the middle scenes hurts it. Extra credit for a great soundtrack, and the director's use of perfect music for each situation ("When you know..."), and the little flute "toodle-ee-ooh" at each of the "fateful" intersections (when Molly Shannon puts the marked $5 bill in her wallet, when Kate sees it on the airplane, etc.)
I can only say why I didn't like it as much as some other Romcoms I've seen- I found the whole premise really annoying! Sara says she believes in fate and she's looking for 'signs'... How many more signs does she want? She's clearly upset after she loses him in the hotel, but she didn't leave it to fate, she manipulated the situation! If you want to believe in fate, fate brought them together! Why did she make it so bloody difficult... I know she had to to make the film, but she generally annoyed me! I think it was more that she felt guilty about being attracted to another man and unhappy in her reaction ship and couldn't quite face up to it!
Also the way johnathan treated his gf... If he didn't really love her he should never have considered marrying her regardless of Sara.
I liked that, too. But at the end it really bugged me when Jonathan was sitting on the rock-hard solid ice and when the camera pulls back there are all these melty spots on it.
But I liked the glove coming through the snow, so I try not to let the ice bug me.