Rewatched AYITL


And I still love it... I figured, like many things before it, I'd have seen through the shine of something new and caught glimpses of the duct tape covering the flaws in the foundation or the mismatched colours betraying the chop shop origins but instead I found extra things to enjoy and still shed tears.

I agree with many here, though, Logan's bizarre dynastic engagement seems out of character considering his trajectory on the show and Rory's continued reliance on him, 9 years after she said "No" to him, is strange. The chemistry between them seems to have improved over the years and I find their two break ups (The phone call in Summer and the final good bye in Fall) to be great scenes.

I find Lorelai far less selfish in this than she was on the show. The drunken rambling at Richard's funeral, on closer inspection, feels realistic and fitting. While they had seemed superficially resolved in the show, Richard's shocking death and Lorelai's unresolved feelings mixed with the alcohol and grief quite probably created in her a vulnerability and inability to think good thoughts. I kept saying to myself "Why doesn't she just say something that happened between them during the show's run?" and even I came up empty. In a way, the stories aren't about Richard's neglect as a father but about Lorelai's failure to be the daughter she should have been. Emily's insults after are exactly in line with her character (understandably furious and unfairly cruel). Everything Emily says drives Lorelai's actions throughout the revival as she tries to come to terms with her flaws.

I love the Life and Death Brigade scene.

The musical, on first view horrendously inappropriate and overly long, is actually fun to watch in its cheesy style.

My other complaint comes from pacing. A feature length episode brings with it many challenges and one of those is keeping people engaged throughout. Stretching a 40 minute format to 1.5 hours is something the creators struggle with and I think they should have hired feature writers to help edit and push. A lot of the Gilmore dialogue is slowed down to fit the run time and a few early on moments are jarring as they try to eat up the mammoth space Netflix has created (Kirk's OOOber joke that only needed to be said once, maybe twice and Rory running around trying to get a signal are two such examples).

However, I like the narrative arc for the three girls. Emily struggling to find her place now that her husband has died feels small in comparison to the other two but the scope of it is actually massive and I think she has the best development. The TV tray scene is depressing and her refusal to socialise despite Rory's pleas is realistic and sad. She no longer belongs to the World of the wives and the DAR but she has no idea who she is. Where she ends up makes me so happy for her. Her "condition" for Lorelai is barely a condition at all, it's an invitation that does nothing but benefit both parties. Her decision to redo the portrait is another small action that carries great weight.

As for Rory, and I know this is where people here get livid, I think her pregnancy is not a hindrance at all. She's already well into the book she's writing and, if its anything like the TV show we all know and love, it will probably be a best seller. She's not going to struggle, she's not going to have to put her life on hold. Rory failed as journalist and that's OK. Failure is a big part of life. She was always a gifted writer, it's prevalent throughout the show. Yes, Jess gives her the idea but she is the one writing it. Jess' final glance through the window is another sweet moment I missed first time around.

The revival isn't perfect but it is better than I expected (and I had high hopes).

My teenage angst has a body count

reply

The revival isn't perfect but it is better than I expected (and I had high hopes).


My expectations were low, and I still got disappointed. I don't wanna disagree with every single point, because I'm honestly glad people enjoy it. I, however, do not, not even after three rewatches. To me, it's all about the balance. Is X worth seeing when we get Y for it? I didn't get enough good scenes to balance the bad ones. But that's just me.

To me, ASP is a great writer who is stuck in a different decade. Things that worked in the 90s didn't even work back in the oughts, but she still did them in the original run and repeated them in this revival. Time has changed, shows have evolved. She can't say she writes for a smart audience and then expects us to overlook blatant plot holes.

One great thing about the revival is Michel's part. Michel, Emily and Paris are definitely in the pro column for me.

----------
Still shopoholic, just wearing a new T-shirt

reply

See, I agree with what you're saying but, I don't know if my Gilmore specs are just too blinding but I find very few poor scenes. Plenty of dull moments but nothing that I found insulting (unlike many moments during the show). I also don't agree with ASP talking about who she made it for. She's far too protective and seems to jealously guard her material without observing the glaring problems (Rory isn't perfect so why does everyone act like she is?) and then disregards criticism.

That being said, perhaps my attachment to the show is just too strong but I love it. I love Luke's outpouring at the end. I love Paris' meltdown in the school and her freak out about the stairs. I love Rory's rant about not having underwear. I love her walk around the house and Richard's appearance. I love Sukie's scene and every moment Michel is present. The cameos are great and fit the show rather than just seeming shoe horned. I think Lorelai and Emily get some serious sympathetic development.

However, i'd love to hear from others. Has anyone else changed opinions or further strengthened theirs on repeat viewings?


My teenage angst has a body count

reply

That being said, perhaps my attachment to the show is just too strong but I love it. I love Luke's outpouring at the end.


I love the show dearly. It's until its fourth season the best thing I've ever seen on TV, and I'm glad it made it this far without fault basically. I love scenes of the revival, I don't like the narrative though. In order to make this whole theme of history repeating itself, an insuperable fate of becoming your mother, believable, Lorelai's story with Luke is just wrong. Their entire relationship was only ever used for cheap drama, and I so would have wished for less drama for them. Was their wedding always supposed to be the climax of this show? For me it wasn't, and I am a huge JavaJunkie shipper. The main relationships didn't change one bit, we see almost no progress among the four leads.

Maybe when I watch this ten years from now I will like it more.

----------
Still shopoholic, just wearing a new T-shirt

reply

The wedding was cheap fan service and I was not impressed. We waited ten years and that's what we get for the main couple of the show? 2 steps forward 10 steps backwards was the theme of the revival. I personally can't rewatch it ever.

"When life gives you lemons"
Jessica D: sleep with their fathers and have secret lemon childrenĀ 

reply

Was it really fan service? And if yes, for whom? I talked to a lot of GG fans who were on team Luke and nobody seemed to have wanted to see a wedding. If they had wanted to make me happy (dirty!), they would have already been married. They can CGI entire scenes and Richard at his desk, but not a stupid wedding photo with him by their side? Come on! This full circle thing would have been more believable if Luke and Lorelai were the new Richard and Emily. Why create more drama? If they had wanted for them to fight over something, why not make this trip of April's the thing? Let them fight about Lorelai giving some money. They didn't change one bit, and I hate how it's all kinda fairy tale-y. The wedding solved all their problems? And then we didn't actually see the wedding? Not that I needed or wanted it, but when there's a wedding, why not show it? We saw Dean and Lindsey's wedding, we saw Lane and Zack's. We didn't see the actual wedding celebration of our alpha couple?

----------
Still shopoholic, just wearing a new T-shirt

reply

I disliked the revival so much that I don't think I'm ever going to re-watch it--I've chosen to ignore it and regard the conclusion of the series as the real "canon." I hated how ASP totally destroyed the characters of Rory, Logan, and Chris. Even though I'm not a Rory fan, I think she deserved a better ending than the one the revival gave her. There's so much I dislike about the revival that it would be a very long list to give. But I'm glad a few folks enjoyed it.

reply

I'm among the few who've seemingly liked it more than they hated it. I've re-watched it a few times now, too. I wish it had more of Rory and Lorelai, since they are my two favorites and a lot more of Paris, since she's my ultimate favorite and had the best scenes. (I don't need to remind anyone of those!)

I wrote a review here : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5435008/board/thread/265348140

My only problems were :

1) Format (90 minutes ) : They really didn't know how to handle it, so they tried to "fill" it up, which brought us the ooober jokes and the musicals.

2) The cameos (Especially from Parenhood and Bunheads) : Just took me out of the story. It's cute alright, but it was so cheesy and in-your-face that it sort of was ridiculous.

3) Not enough Rory and Lorelai : It just felt weird. I don't know, I guess it makes sense that they don't have the same relationship that they did have when Rory was in school, but they just felt odd. Not at all like Lorelai and Rory, and not at all like mother and daughter. Sort of like, Lorelai was an aunt? Something was just not right, and I blame the lack of scenes. It should have been ALL about htem.

4) Musicals (Just the ones with Sutton in them) : I actually loved the Life and Death Brigade as well. I even have it on my phone. Logan is the dream guy.

reply