MovieChat Forums > Baran (2001) Discussion > Exclusive interview with Majid Majidi

Exclusive interview with Majid Majidi


Exclusive interview with Majid Majidi

1. What is the role of politics in your work? Is art an effective, or even subversive, form for addressing political questions?

I consider that subjects directly related to politics tend to be covered in a journalistic form, eager for sensationalism and in any case with a short-term vision. I always tried to avoid them. This does not mean that I close my eyes on political realities of the world in a desire to be unaware of them. On the contrary I am quite conscious of them but I try rather by my cinema to give them a human face.

2. Iranian films seem to have rediscovered a humanism that Western art has forgotten. Can the humanistic integrity of your work be attributed to the influence of religion?

Iran is an old country with a significant cultural history. Our literature is very rich with poets such as Hafiz, Saadi, Rumi. In their writings, these poets have always given a great importance to the human being. Contemporary cultural subjects are stemming from this tradition as well as the rituals associated with them. The manner these subjects are dealt with is influenced by the particular beliefs of the Iranians that existed and continue to exist nowadays. These days, the world, and in particular the Western world, is in a period of disruption with the past. Human being and traditional moral values, dear to people, seem to have been lost in the process.

3. Contrary to the Western perception of Islamic societies, the women in your films are very dynamic characters. Why are Muslim women portrayed as victims in Western films?

It seems that the Western governments thrives to impose the stereotype of a Moslem world that is backward and narrow minded. This is often justified by political considerations. We know that more than 65% of the world energetic resources are in grounds of Moslem countries. The industrialised countries, mostly Western, have always during modern history thrived to increase their control over these areas. Precisely, in this moment the United States attack on Iraq in order to control its politic and its oil, illustrates very well the persistence of these intentions of control usually disguised into ideals of freedom and democracy. Fortunately few believes that is the case. It is clear that the Western governments, and particularly the United States, always tried to portray the Moslems by exploiting specific cases. For example, the Taliban and other extremists regime whose creation and existence were encouraged by the U.S. were used to present to the world a picture of an Islam based on terror and intolerance particularly toward women. For the Talibans, the women were nothing more than animals. Thus, during years, the perception of the Western towards the Moslem women was influenced by this presentation. Islam practised in the rest of the world is very different. In my opinion, this does not reflect the reality of women and I think the true identity of the Moslem women remains to be discovered by the West.

4. Baran has refugees as its main characters. Do you think that migration is treated differently in Western and non-Western societies?

Without any doubt there exists differences between the approach made to migration. In the Western countries have a strict quota to accept emigrants and a stricter quota for refugees. The fear of these governments is that these emigrants will put a strain on the economy , therefore they prefer those who fit certain level of education and self-sufficiency. The emigrants who are uneducated and are fleeing poverty are bluntly rejected, as we have seen recently in Australia. In the West, the economic and cultural criteria take precedence over humane considerations.

In Iran, the prospect is completely different. War and famine made the Afghan refugees cross the border to find food and shelter in Iran. They were dispossessed and mostly illiterate. None was rejected. Those with financial means and education emigrated to the Western countries. The official figures of the UNHCR indicates that the number of refugees registered in Iran reached 2 million, the highest density of refugees in the world. If illegal refugees are included, the figure is around 4 million. Despite the economic crisis prevailing in Iran, they were provided with a secure shelter, food, schooling and a chance to survive. Zahra Bahrami,"Baran" came to Iran with her family when she was 3 years old. Her father is an uneducated manual labourer. They lived in the refugee camp of Torbat e Jan where Zahra went to school, got an education similar to Iranian children and is soon ready to join the university. In this perspective, Iran made an exceptional humanistic gesture and is rewarded by these kind of results.

5. Why do you think that Iranian films have become so successful in the outside world?

In my opinion, if one pays attention to the human being and to human values whether they are related to the Iranian culture or another, one ends up being unaware of the borders. There certainly exist differences among peoples in the area of economy or technology, but the human values remain universal, because the human beings were created equal by God. Indeed, the feelings, emotions and aspirations such love, friendship, heroism etc... are present in all human beings. The language of Art can facilitate bringing people together people towards the conscience of a common humanity, despite differences in races, cultures, nationality. I think that the Iranian cinema almost found this language and the world of today, thirsty for love and friendship seems to understand it without difficulties.



6. How would you picture/write/direct something that you would call ‘European’?

I never considered making a film outside Iran and I really do not know how I would write it or directed it.

======================================================

Majid M ajidi , May 2003


http://www.flickr.com/photos/shutterbug_iconium/

reply

shutterbug, thank you for posting the interview but it confuses me greatly. majidi says that iran and the u.s. treat immigrants completely differently and that iran doesn't turn away afghanis , but gives them housing and education etc. But his film says that the afghanis cannot get legal jobs because they have no papers; therefore they cannot legally feed themselves. Am i misunderstanding something?

also, i did not think that this film presented Baran ('women') as a dynamic character at all. From what i saw,she had no power, at home or beyond.
She wasn't allowed to work with or be around men; she had no say in decisions about her family's situation or future. In the film, she never speaks, and that pretty much shows me a powerless person. So WHAT is majidi talking about? did he have to give these interview answers , "toting the party line" as we say, to not endanger himself or his family? because this film certainly shows me the opposite of what he says. Please help me understand more.









Ad hoc, Ad loc, Quid pro queeee,
So little time and so much to see

reply

@ Film_ophile

About your first question....the answer is itself in the interview....Iran and the US treat immigrants completely differently...as it is said that The girl BARAN is a Afgan refuge staying in Iran from the age of 3 and it is also mentioned that there are officially 2 million immigrants in Iran however the actual number is around 4 million. This shows the difference in the treatment to refugees.
However the nightmarish life of an Afghan family shown in the film is also very fairly depicted because heavy import of immigrants was affecting Irans economy, and thus Iran officials at last have to imposed and parctised certain rules and regulation against Afagans.
However you will notice that throughout the film the director has portrait the love and affection of Iranies for Afaganies.

About Second Question, even I dont have any better answer however I will only like to tell you that it is just the way we look at certain things.

Hope That I have answered your query.....

Thanks


"Franz Kafka, Van Gogh, Michelangalo were unrecognized geniuses in their life. Recognise me !!"

reply

pawan,
It certainly helps to know that the situation with Afghanis not being able to get legal work- is a recent one.

But I did not really see 'love and affection of iranis towards afghanis'in the film.I saw an irani boy who fell in love with an afghani (but he had called her names before that); I saw an Irani boss who seemed to be a good guy with his Afghani workers. Where was the love of Iranis for Afghanis? Did I miss something? If it exists in reality, that's wonderful; i just did not see it in the film.

Also, I'm afraid that you assume that I understand your proof of the difference between the u.s. and iran in their immigration policies. Is it just the numbers of immigrants that Iran allowed that you think makes the difference?and to Majidi in his interview answer?

thank you again for your clarification.






Ad hoc, Ad loc, Quid pro queeee,
So little time and so much to see

reply