MovieChat Forums > Halloween: Resurrection (2002) Discussion > I'll take this over the Rob Zombie atroc...

I'll take this over the Rob Zombie atrocities any day.


Was it flawed? Yes. But I actually thought it was a fun, mindless sequel. I prefer it over H20 even. Not deserving of a 3.9 rating, IMO.

reply

Your out of your mind if you think this is better then any other Halloween movie. Seriously. H20 was one of the better, if not the best sequel in the series. I agree RZs Halloween has many flaws but it's very hard to say this is better. This was made during a time when horror was trying to figure out what it wanted to be, and it shows.

reply

i love this movie and robs halloween, and the haters are so pathetic

ehy H2 haters, look this
http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr226/zombiezombie/suck.jpg

reply

[deleted]

This and the older Halloween movies. I believe this concluded the series since also Lorie was killed by Michael after it seems she's been trying to kill him for 20 years. I'm not too fond of remakes and then sequels following that remake and not just doing a sequel to follow that original when it was made anyway.

reply

This is like saying you'd take bowel cancer over an inoperable brain tumour.

reply

[deleted]

H20, even though i kind of dislike it because it breaks continuity, is far superior to this abomination. At the end of H20, you got the impression that this finally was the end of the storyline for Laurie's character and the way it is explained how Michael survived, is so poor and far fetched that it becomes evident that this project was pure milking. Now, every halloween sequel was a milking project, but it's a mistake to make it that obvious.

Rob Zombie's first Halloween was an excellent remake, which paid a great deal of respect to the original, while maintaining it's own style.

Ressurrection however, did nothing, zero, to further the original Halloween timeline. H20 broke it, and ressurrection destroyed it. My second problem with it was that Michael had no goal in it. He had finally killed his sister, and Jamie from H4-6 did not exist in that universe. What was left of his reason to live?

reply

John was still out there, as hinted at by the picture of him on Laurie's room/s wall. Didn't know how to find him, though. As much as Halloween is about Michael and Laurie, it's also about the Myers House and Haddonfield. Delving into his origins for real this time, his upbringing, etc. was a great idea, but unfortunately it was all fake. That is where they missed the mark. That and yet again the poor casting for out of place hip, hot, young actors.



"He came home." - Dr. Sam Loomis from the original HalloweeN

reply

In the H1, 2 and H20 universe, we don't really know much about Michael's motives. All we know is that he's out to kill his sister. We don't know if it was important to him to take out the rest og his Family tree, and this film implies it wasn't. It became evident in the H4 - 6 universe that he wanted to wipe out his entire family, but that's a separate storyline.

reply

Its not better than Zombie's first Halloween (it was actually quite good, kept the original's spirit intact and had some nice homages and throwbacks to Carpenter's classic). Its far better than Zombie's second film, which I did like, but think is the weakest of the bunch (mostly due to the drastic character change of Loomis, and Michael walking around without his mask.) About H2 though, the theater cut is better than the DC version (at least Laurie was likeable in the theater cut, whereas in the DC she's completely unlikeable).









"I've learned our choices always matter to someone, somewhere."- Daud, Killer of the Empress

reply

[deleted]

I agree: I enjoyed it much more than both the Zombie-weens (though the first was leagues better than the second).








"I am the one who knocks."

reply