Good Film


Contrary to the review posted on the front of this film's page, this was a good film. The Australians couldn't help but show true Australian, realistic attitudes, particularly Dr Julian Osbourne's (Bryan Brown) cynicism. He was made to look doomsday-ish for a reason. Most Australians would believe in seeing both sides to everything (except for sport but that's another topic) and Dr Osbourne showed the "anti-hope" for balance.
On the comment regarding the "Blame America First" movement, you show your arrogance by this comment Mr Paddon. America was at fault, as were the Chinese. However, you didn't see any Chinese in the film (presumably because someone blew them up), so somebody had to be blamed. If it was not for the Americans' pressure tactics, the disaster would not have occurred. Simple. I am not an American-basher, but it is the way the film went. In Australia during the Vietnam war, our own troops were spat on as they marched off, and again when they returned. It was not their fault personally, but they represented those who were at fault. The same happened in the film to the American characters.
The comments regarding casting are appalling. Gregory Peck was undoubtably one of the greatest actors ever, so how can you compare anyone to him? Did you stop to think that perhaps the director didn't want to clone the original but maybe put his own slant on it? We all saw how well the remake of Psycho was done when it was copied scene for scene, yet you suggest that this should've been done the same way. Admittedly, Armand Assante isn't my favourite actor, but he played the role given to him well. Grant Bowler played an excellent role as Lt Peter Holmes and Jaqueline McKenzie was good as his wife Mary. An actor is only as good as the script, and vice-versa, and I believe each played their role at least as well as it was written.
The characters carried a three-dimensionality that is difficult to find in many films today. The Captain was stricken with guilt over the fact he was unable to be with his family when they died, Dr Osbourne was coming to the realisation that he would die alone, and Lt Holmes was intent on saving his family. They all had motivation outside duty.
Overall, this was generally a good movie. The actors did well, and the sombre ending made you think about the stupidity of war.

reply

I thought this was a very good movie, and the Anti-American sentiment was portrayed realistically. Americans arriving in Australia after the bombs were dropped would certainly be treated this way (as would any Chinese), whether or not the treatment would be justified is up for debate. I'm glad the movie didn't focus primarily on this. It still had a story to tell.

I loved everyone in this film. Bryan Brown probably was the worst of the bunch, though, only because he didn't have too much meat to his character, thus his demise at the end didn't carry as much weight as it should have.

Besides that (and the questionable last scene), I really enjoyed this movie. It was depressing but at the same time very touching and humane. The scenes in Alaska (and especially the shots of San Francisco) were eerie, and there was always this building tension.

I also liked it because (as the original) it didn't focus on the traditional movie plot. There is no saving grace that occurs in the final moments. They know the worst is going to happen, they try to find a way to fight it, but ultimately they realize there's nothing they can do...and so the majority of them die with dignity.

I would also recommend the 1998 Canadian film "Last Night" which deals with the end of the world in a similar manner.

reply

I am an Australian academic who specialises in American History. I have taught close to probably fifty American exchange students at an Australian university since 1998. The students have been continually surprised at the level of anti-American sentiment expressed to them (particularly in bars). The open hostility towards Americans is in large measure restricted to verbal tirades regarding perceived American arrogance and insularity. This is a trend which became acute under the leadership of President George W. Bush.

This said, the remarkable level of support that my American students received in September to December (when they went home) of 2001, was heartening. They all expressed to me an appreciation of the support and well wishes that they received from Australians - many who had simply overheard them speaking and picked up on their accents. Following the invasion of Iraq however, this air of goodwill was lost. Afghanistan was one thing, and was accepted with generally good graces. The rhetoric used by the president in selling the Iraq war was poorly selected for maintaining America’s popular support internationally.

The presentation of anti-American views in the movie would have been typical, in my opinion, of many sober Australians following such a nuclear exchange. Most of us tend not to resort to outright attacks or unprovoked assaults. However, if anyone interferes with our somewhat laid-back lifestyle and brings trouble to our content little world, they are likely to receive a fairly laconic and colourful observation or two. If anything therefore, I believe that the anti-Americanism in the movie was played just enough to make the point that it would exist. It probably stopped short of how severe the comments to visiting Americans would have been had they been seen to be involved in the destruction of the world however. It was probably an executive decision for the purposes of international distribution.

In closing I would just like to observe that I am continually surprised by how shocked most Americans seem to be that they are not welcomed as conquering heroes in nations that they consider to be allies. I make no judgements as to whether these receptions are warranted, but merely note that perhaps the domestic American media have failed their citizens in the task of educating them as to the realities of relations with a superpower. The fact is that majority of the world is rather pleased indeed that America is the most powerful nation on Earth. They just wish that it would live up to its own ideals (impossible to reach though they are) more often.

reply