I've seen "Teacher's Pet: Devil in the Flesh 2" one night on HBO but I'd never seen the first one, "Devil in the Flesh". I notice on imdb cast list it has Rose McGowan as "Debbie Strand" but Jodi Lyn O'Keefe as "Debbie Strong". Is these two movies about the same person/character??
thanks to anyone who can help.
I've never seen the first one yet either, but I saw the second finally tonight. I do believe thought the last names are slightly different (Maybe it's a type error!!!) that they are the same characters, just played by different actresses. I loved Rose McGowan in Jawbreakers, so I'd imagine she was good in Devil's in the Flesh, but still I thought Jodi did an amazing job in the sequel. Jodi & Rose are 2 of fav actresses!
shareI finally rented Devil in the Flesh (The version I got though is called Dearly Devoted, a title I like better. Also I don't like it when they add a 2 to the sequels i.e Devil in the Flesh 2. I think it sounds so cheesy, I like it when they come up with a separate name for them, or do it in a way that doesn't use numbers at the end i.e. Clint Eastwood movies: Anyway which buyt Loose and Anyway which way you can. Dearly Devoted and Teacher's Pet are better sutied names!) Anways Rose Mcgowan gave yet another excellent performance as the *itch but the storyline was seemed rushed and unbelievable. I like how they set up the plot in the sequel better. There was more interaction with Debbie & the teacher (different teacher in the each film) in Teacher's Pet, they seemed closer. It wasn't a error, Rose Mcgowan played Debbie Strand, and Jodi Lyn O'keefe played Debbie Strong. They are the exact same characters, but for some strange reason the writter changed Strand to Strong. Weird! Why do they always do stupid stuff like that? Do they think the audience are totally dumb and won't realize? Whatever! People today pick up everything. Hey they even a site devoted to picking out errors in movies. Anyways overall Devil in the Flesh (Dearly Devoted) wasn't that good but I loved Rose McGowan's performance. Devil in the Fleash 2 (Teacher's Pet) was way better, and very good movie overall and I think Jodi Lyn did an amazing job taking over for Rose. Jodi is a good actress and plays snotty *itchy characters so well, but Rose is stil the Queen!
shareYeah it's taken yawl that long to see it. I mean N/O it comes on HBO alot. But you can get it in Wal-Mart. I just did. I've got both films Devil in the Flesh 1 & 2 and I also taped them one night and the HBO virsions are different. Not much but just slightly.
lol.
What are the differences between the HBO and video versions?
"Remember...wherever you go, there you are."share
ya i kno its cheesy for them to do that but they only do that becuz so you kno thats its the sequel
unless they go Devil In The Flesh: Teacher's Pet, but the title is really long so it'll look kinda silly lol, but yeah thats the only reason why they do that
I liked the sequel, but I have to say that the firsto ne was alot better, because rose mcgowan just does a way better job and it's alot more convincing. Also Rose does look alot sexier in her movie than jodi does in the sequel. Ive been looking for online clips of it everywhere but I cant find anything.
shareWell, maybe this wasn't originally planned as a sequel. It would be considered a ripoff, but the original title was "Teacher's Pet". BTW, the doctor in the beginning is played by the same actor who played the teacher in the first one. Strange...
shareno it was definitely planned as a sequel....almost everything or practically everything had connections from the first one
shareI viewed them both but I must say that it has been some time since and now my memory is not so good of it. Nothing really stuck. I remember some soft core sex scenes and of course, Jody Lynn O'Keefe was quiet bizzare, especially in the desert and the dorm. The second one seemed to be better shot and better directed but the first may have been a bit better effects wise, especially the fire. I can't say that the franchise should be again tapped.
share[deleted]