The truth about the Dish
http://members.pcug.org.au/~mdinn/TheDish/
shareThnaks for that, I would hope most people watching this would see the comic farce built into the script. But then people are gullible.
It is still a great movie, and is able to capture the spirit and awe the space program created.
I generally don't believe everyone (save a few select Nasa-nuts) is gullible simply take everything they see in motion pictures to be absolute gospel. I think "most people" watching most movies based on real events KNOW their being fed a little sugar to make the experience more pleasant. In some cases, a LOT of sugar, as is the case with The Dish.
As Altpensacola at least acknowledges, it IS a great movie, and it DOES capture the spirit and awe the space program created. Turning it into a docudrama to appease "those who were there" or "those who know better", would have made it a rather UNcinematic experience, interesting at best because of its adherence to technical recreation and accuracy, but lacking in the heart the filmmakers bring to the story, even if they do so with admittedly rose-colored glasses. ;)
Are you saying Star Wars isn't real?!
Bourne + Bond = Best Action Film Award
As anyone working in a technical occupation knows, the engineers in Parkes would never have tried to mislead NASA about their technical problems as depicted in the film. Such dishonesty once discovered would mean the end of the career of everyone involved, if not actual criminal prosecution.
In real life the serious wiring problem Parkes experienced was the explosion of the television scan-converter, which occurred weeks before the Apollo 11 launch, but was only finally fixed after the launch but before the landing on the moon. Of course NASA was fully informed and assisted in the repairs.
The real-life "Dishmaster", John G. Bolton, was a famous pioneer in radio astronomy, first winner of the Jansky Prize, who was Professor of Astronomy at California Institute of Technology before leaving to take over management of the Parkes Observatory as Director, Australian National Radio Astronomy Observatory. Bolton's wife Letty survived him when he died in 1993, so Sam Neill's character being a widower in the film was also not true to life.
This movie did communicate well the grandeur of Apollo 11's achievement. It's a shame they falsified history in doing so. Regrettably that seems to be something that movie makers almost always do.
It makes for good drama (and a bit of comedy); and hey, if it's just a few of the details changed instead of, you know, the WHOLE STORY, I can deal with it.
Supermodels...spoiled stupid little stick figures mit poofy lips who sink only about zemselves.
The guy that authored that web page sounds like a right miserable sod.
shareThe OP's website seems a mix of the truth and sour grapes. From the Parkes Observatory page of Wikipedia: "In the first few minutes of the broadcast, NASA alternated between the signals being received from its two stations at Goldstone and Honeysuckle Creek, searching for the best quality picture."
[NOTE: it is generally agreed that the images of Armstrong's first step onto the moon's surface came from Honeysuckle Creek]
"A little under nine minutes into the broadcast, the TV was switched to the Parkes signal. The quality of the TV pictures from Parkes was so superior that NASA stayed with Parkes as the source of the TV for the remainder of the 2.5 hour broadcast. For a comprehensive explanation of the TV reception of the Apollo 11 broadcast, see "The Television Broadcasts" from the report "On Eagles Wings".
So really. Who would want to watch a movie about the Honeysuckle Creek station, with the main character saying after a few minutes of broadcasting the climactic moonwalk, "Ok guys, they've cut away from our low-quality signal and are using the much superior Parkes signal." Would this be preferable to what was shown in The Dish. I don't think so.
I find it fascinating that some of the posters to this film's boards appear to have experienced some degree of guilt for actually having enjoyed (all or part of) an entertainment. Working Dog Productions don't produce documentaries and this was never claimed to be anything other than a comedy - drama based on a true story, which it clearly was.🐭
share