Historical Accuracy of the Roman Legion
Hey guys, so I'm very interested in learning more about Rome and it's ways. Especially the Roman Legion. What I've learned so far seems to go in direct contrast with what happened to Maximus's wife and son. The killing I can accept, but (if it was true) what Commodus says about her being raped repeatedly...that seems out of character with what I've read.
The men who led the attack on his wife and son, for the order to be given so quickly, it had to come from Quintus and be carried out by his men (or even Maximus's men) - if this is the case, I cannot see them raping the wife like that or killing the boy in such a cruel way. The men are portrayed as loving their General. The other alternative is that the group that carried out the attack were Commodus's own soldiers which makes more sense, but I still cannot justify this act of savagery.
What I've learned so far is that the Roman Legion wanted to be as separate from Barbarians as possible and prided themselves on being civilised, even when killing. The whole time they were on the road they made a big deal out of setting up a very civilised camp, not just sleeping anywhere. They would only eat wheat and frumentum also, they would eat it every single day, without fail - they were actually punished by NOT being allowed to eat the same boring stuff over and over. This again was to be as separate from the Barbarians who drunk ale and ate meat every night.
I can't see them raping her and this is assuming that they did and Commodus wasn't just being especially nasty and lying.
Now I'm not being naïve and hopefully not annoying. I'd just love to hear more about this from someone who really knows about it.
Also, for those who do know their stuff about Rome, how accurate was this film with regards to the military aspects? What was accurate and what wasn't?
Thanks in advance, this is such fascinating stuff.
___"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars. Except for trolls."____