MovieChat Forums > Gladiator (2000) Discussion > Gladiator vs Braveheart

Gladiator vs Braveheart


I just watched Gladiator for the 100th time, and that movie is one of the best I've ever seen. Now Braveheart on the other hands some would say has better action scenes. I think they rub neck to neck in action scenes go. As far as the story and cinematography goes Gladiator wins hands down. I know Mel Gibson is an ok director but he can't hold a candle to Ridley. I'm not really all that supportive of actors directing themselves either. Which is the better movie to you and why?

"Guns don't kill people..People kill people"

reply

Gladiator = Greatest Epics of all time.


Nothing like a nighttime stroll to give you ideas.

reply

I watched both movies back to back today, and Braveheart is the better movie for me, but just barely. Both Wallace and Maximus are driven by revenge, but I feel I'm more emotionally connected to the characters in Braveheart.

reply

Gladiator by far.

Wasn't a fan of Braveheart.

reply

The winner is Gladiator.

But the two films should not be compared. And no, they are not the same movie as some people claim, using the most superficial and general plot points for comparison.

Braveheart is told in a naturalistic, human fashion.
Gladiator is told in a mythological fashion, in the vein of the legends of Achilles and Ulysses, with all mighty reach for immortality through noble action, honorable deaths and defense of principles until the very last breath as is the way with Greek mythology.

IT absolutely is not simply a "revenge tale" as people claim. It is about the pursuit of the ideal expression of humanity; This is a battle between degradation (the lower animalistic Rome) and transcendence (the dream of Rome).



I personally prefer the grandness and transcendence of Gladiator, presenting Maximus as a mythic hero. It is inspiring. It's so lean as to be poetic. No one scene is extraneous or wasted. IT moves so well that you can watch it again and again and still feel your spirit surge. And that's what great myths are for. (I have on several occasions watched multiple viewings back to back). I have no desire to do that with Braveheart and I am not transfixed to the battles nor every scene in Braveheart as I am with Gladiator.

I scored this a perfect 10 years ago and I score it a perfect 10 today. It will never grow stale. Or lose its power. When I read ridiculous reviews like on Rotten Tomatoes where one idiot claimed that Gladiator was meaningless... I think these are the types of people who don't deserve to be exposed to mythology.

reply

Gladiator has better mass appeal. I could care less about Braveheart and that section of history. Rome was a world hub, like today's New York or London.

reply

[deleted]

"Rob Roy" beats them both, in my opinion, but I believe they're both equal. "Braveheart" has a better score, better characters and a way better ending, but "Gladiator" has better direction and acting.

Hard to pick between them!

reply

Gladiator for sure. Liked Rob Roy too but Gladiator is unforgettable and the fight scenes crunch.

reply

Gladiator wouldn't exist without Braveheart. Braveheart brought the whole genre back. And it did it without endless CGI. Braveheart is a masterpiece. Gladiator is a really good movie.

reply