MovieChat Forums > Tigerland (2001) Discussion > homoerotic

homoerotic

posted 17 years ago by snow_garden
27 replies | jump to latest

Is this the most homoerotic war film ever?

[–] 17 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 17 years ago

[deleted]

[–] angelos01 16 years ago

Someone's got a bee up his pants. Fire, baby, pure fire!

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] lemonade_master17 16 years ago

I was just coming to post that same thing. I thought the relationship between Bozz and Paxton could just as easily have gone farther than friends.

~ j'adore faire l'amour ~

[–] RuthlessGoat 16 years ago

Read my review, girls.

http://www.ruthlessreviews.com/reviews.cfm/id/1105/page/tigerland.html

[–] klc-16 16 years ago

Probably - considering that it's the only one I know of made by a gay director!
Anyone who doesn't see the homo-eroticism of this film is either in self-denial or blind.
But then, put Colin Farrel in ANY film - with his shirt(or more) off - and it will automatically be homoerotic! He is just stunning! :0)

[–] akronactor 16 years ago

As a graduate of 19D Cavalry Scout school, I have to agree with the assessment that this movie is homoerotic. If you put guys in an all male environment long enough, the homoeroticism is going to happen. The sad part here is that the men were able to be around women on the weekends, yet STILL managed to act homo with each other.

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] zfish_3636 16 years ago

Youll find what your looking for...someone is in denial.

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]