MovieChat Forums > Thriller (1973) Discussion > 'Screamer' - have I got this right??? (S...

'Screamer' - have I got this right??? (Spoilers!)


The Jim Norton character "The Man" is just a lost German tourist looking for a girl he once met, and he follows Pamela Franklin's character purely innocently to ask her for directions or some such...

But Franklin's character promptly kills him and buries him in the garden believing he's the rapist, all because she's just heard the rapist had blonde hair... So now all Jim Norton sightings from this moment on are purely in her mind.

This leads us to believe the real rapist must have attacked her shortly after on the same night making her go even more insane, but I feel on the evidence that her mental state must have been fragile from the very start.

What I'm confused about is, are the farm van guy and the man who breaks down supposed to be the same man?? (Not Jim Norton obviously I Know!) I'm guessing their actually NOT, cos why would the guy go to a house and see the mad woman who's not long run him over and not say anything??? even if he didn't see her clearly, surely he would remember the car that smashed into him for no reason??

I think they just decided to give him a limp to confuse the issue a bit.

That's what I make of the whole thing anyway, I thought it was a very good episode, maybe the strongest one of all so far... as I've only watched up to Screamer so far.

reply

The girl is a lunatic. You must not believe anything she sees.

reply

Pamela Franklin's character was never raped during the course of the episode. Like Catherine Deneuve's character in Repulsion, she had suffered some sort of sexual abuse as a child (it is never specified) and simply imagined the whole event after killing the tourist in "imaginary self defense."

Excellent episode and one of the finst "Thrillers." If you enjoyed it, I recommend the underrated film The Stendhal Syndrome (1996) with Asia Argento and Thomas Kretschmann. A similar premise with a superb and stylish execution even if a lot more graphic in terms of violence.

reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The German tourist who the central character opened the door too when he called at her friend's house while she was there alone is stated, in the conversation between the German detective on his track and the British detective, to be believed to have been seeking the address out as the home of a former girlfriend during a previous spell in England. The main character was already frightened after seeing this man on the train after hearing a description of a rapist on the loose who answered his description, and this, the disturbed mental state we are told was already present by the psychiatrist at the end, and the man's subsequent, innocent, call at the house of her friends when she arrived there alone ahead of them, pushed her over the edge into killing him. One assumes that the German is not a good speaker of English, hence his silence, rather than saying 'Hello' politely, when he sees the girl looking at him in the carriage, initial silence with the ticket collector, and when calling at the house, which one now realises would be due to him searching in his mind for the right words, but, when one first watchs it, gives him an air of silent mystery onto which one can project a conception of menace.

The disarray in the house after the supposed rape, and the bruises we see the girl suffered, were from his attempted self-defense, not rape-although it is not credible that a medical examination after the supposed rape does not reveal a lack of vaginal bruising and presence of semen.

After this event, the central character simply projects the face of this man onto random men she sees, when her mental disturbance is in resurgence. My belief is the man who called at her friends' house with the limp was not in fact the man she had rammed with the car at the farm, but that he was given a limp in the writing so one might think he was, before one knew the mental condition that was the twist in the tale of the story. One imagines had the man with the limp actually been the man rammed with the car, he would most likely have recognised the central character as the driver, and also the limping man would not have been as affable and relaxed as he seems with the main character's friends, so soon after what appeared to have been a near-death experience.

The psychiatrist at the end alludes to some unnamed experience in the girl's past that has led to her disturbed state. Reading between the lines, one assumes this event must have been some form of abuse at the hands of a man who answered the description she heard of the rapist at large and who looked extremely similar to the German tourist who made the ill-fated call at the house-hence her traumatised and tragic response to hearing of the rapist and his appearance, then seeing the German tourist on the train and again at the front door. The violence she suffered in the man's attempt to defend himself must then have been distorted in her mind into a further episode of abuse.

This is my joint favourite of the Thriller episodes, along with 'If It's A Man-Hang Up.' Both are among the very darkest of all the stories-but 'Screamer' has the edge of blackness, for me. The scene in which we see her attack the caller at the house, then see him dragging himself along the rear window, all bloody, before he later still staggers through the back door, still barely alive, after the girl has attacked her male host after the trauma of the incident with the dying man, counts as what must be the most disturbing sequence in any of the plays. An impressively atmospheric episode, that communicates a profound sense of darkness and tragedy.

reply

I agree with the answers to the original posters question and would like to add that the man with the limp who called at the girl's house was definitely NOT the farmer whom she had run down with the car earlier.

If you notice at the end of the episode the inspector informs the German private detective that the case is closed and says that she killed two men and injured another two.

The two men she killed were -

1. The German tourist whom she saw on the train and who later had the misfortune to knock on the door of her friend's house where she bludgeoned him to death and buried his body in the garden.

2. The farmer whom she ran down with the car at his farm. There is no way he could have survived being hit square on, full force by a car driven at speed. (Also if you remember the inspector talks about investigating a hit and run and visits a mortuary to look at the body.

The two men she injured were -

1. The car driver with the limp who had broken down and called at her friend's house and later returned when she was there alone and she bludgeoned him several times but he was still alive at the end.

2. Her friend's husband whom she hit once and broke his arm before her friend brought her to her senses by shouting out 'Stop that's Jeffrey!'


P.S - the ticket collector at the rail station reminds me very much of Bernie Scripps, the garage owner and undertaker in 'Heartbeat'!!!!!!!

reply