Those boys were borderline creepy and criminally voyeuristic. I guess, it's kind of endearing that they fetishized "the Lisbon" girls. I mean, they stalked, watched, and documented the girls whole complete lives through a window across the street, stolen possessions, and recollections of neighborhood deadbeats.
The girls knew they were being watched and as time progressed encouraged it. If young people are mutually curious about each other and invite observation and communication, it is unfair to categorize one gender as being "criminally voyeuristic."
What I have always took away from the film is the girls knew the boys were always watching and in the end when they made a suicide pact, they (or just Lux) wanted someone other than their parents to witness and be deeply affected, so they would be remembered in an idealized way - the way in which young longing love can be heartache but amazing. Trip proved adult love is harsh and complicated. Although the girls or Lux were young, it was unfair of them to traumatize the boys in such a way. The girls are gone, but their memory still haunts the boys until the present day. However, the girls are victims too and also had no real way of knowing the negative profound impact on the boys.
It's a tragic story, but I have seen a few posts that the boys were criminals, stalkers, perverts, or misrepresented because they didn't run up to the roof to run the train on Lux. To make a sweeping generalization about a gender's thoughts, actions, and beliefs is sexism and really shows a poor understanding of your fellow humans.
reply
share