Kennedy media fantasy


Sheldon M. Stern—who was the historian at the John F. Kennedy Library for 23 years and the first scholar to evaluate the ExComm tapes—is among the numerous historians who have tried to set the record straight. His new book marshals irrefutable evidence to succinctly demolish the mythic version of the crisis.

Reached through sober analysis, Stern’s conclusion that “John F. Kennedy and his administration, without question, bore a substantial share of the responsibility for the onset of the Cuban missile crisis” would have shocked the American people in 1962, for the simple reason that Kennedy’s administration had misled them about the military imbalance between the superpowers and had concealed its campaign of threats, assassination plots, and sabotage designed to overthrow the government in Cuba—an effort well known to Soviet and Cuban officials.

This included deploying, beginning in 1961, intermediate-range “Jupiter” nuclear missiles in Italy and Turkey—adjacent to the Soviet Union. From there, the missiles could reach all of the western U.S.S.R., including Moscow and Leningrad (and that doesn’t count the nuclear-armed “Thor” missiles that the U.S. already had aimed at the Soviet Union from bases in Britain).

Given America’s powerful nuclear superiority, as well as the deployment of the Jupiter missiles, Moscow suspected that Washington viewed a nuclear first strike as an attractive option.

Philip Nash’s elegant 1997 study, The Other Missiles of October—Kennedy’s deployment of the Jupiter missiles “was a key reason for Khrushchev’s decision to send nuclear missiles to Cuba.” Khrushchev reportedly made that decision in May 1962, declaring to a confidant that the Americans “have surrounded us with bases on all sides” and that missiles in Cuba would help to counter an “intolerable provocation.”

reply

[deleted]

Of course Kevin Costner played a non existent adviser who was the voice of sanity(hero). And of course, as is always the case, from Hollywood, it was the warmongering military that was the problem. This movie was an embarrassing silly melodrama that was a revision of reality similar to what the Russians often do with the truth. People believe this stuff (it even had Walter Cronkite images). It is incredibly sad we as a people in the US believe this is history...sort of like the way the Russians believe their government version of history.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/01/the-real-cuban-mis sile-crisis/309190/2/

reply

Kenny O'Donnell was not a made up character, he was a real person and aide to the president, albeit in a greatly reduced role than portrayed in this film. Robert McNamara vehemently stated that O'Donnell played virtually no role in the true events, but it was Ted Sorenson who offered most assistance to the Kennedys.

reply

Good post. It's amazing how the US always manages to portray itself as the victim when other countries respond to its never-ceasing aggression toward the rest of the world. "Oh why would the Soviets do something so awful as put nuclear missiles on our border??", without the giving the slightest thought to the fact that the US had already been doing the exact same thing to the Soviets, surrounding their country with nukes. There were US nukes in Britain, Italy, Turkey, West Germany (at least at some point; i'm not sure if they were there at the time of the Cuban Missile Crisis), and in Japan and South Korea. Plus the extremely aggressive US behavior toward Cuba, including a massive campaign of terrorism waged by right-wing exiles sponsored by the CIA. For some reason it's just assumed that the US has the right to do whatever it wants around the world, but if the rest of the world ever responds in any way, then it's shocking and "unprovoked".

Also, the mere fact that the Soviets had nukes in Cuba does not mean they intended to use them, but for some reason it seems to be automatically assumed that the Soviets meant to launch the nukes. In fact the Soviets never remotely considered the idea; they were there to impose a balance of power, to deter the US from taking advantage of the imbalance that existed and starting a war against the socialist bloc. Within a few years after the missile crisis, the Soviets greatly improved their ICBM deterrent and were able to hit the US from the USSR, but they didn't take advantage of that capability by doing it; it was only ever meant to be a deterrent.

The only country that has ever actually used nuclear weapons on human beings was the United States (and the US had openly threatened to use nukes again multiple times since then), and therefore it was the Soviet Union that had grounds to find the US untrustworthy with nukes, not the other way around.

Sig under construction

reply

Kawada, not sure what country you're from, but Russia or any European nation putting tactical nukes or offensive weapons of any kind in the Western hemisphere is a direct violation of the Monroe doctrine. The US had every right to intervene, and get those missles out of there. Be thankful that they took diplomatic channels or today the world may not be a very nice place to live.

USA made no secret about the weapons already based around USSR. But the Russian ambassador lied right to Kennedy's face about the weapons being sneaked onto the island.



Living in the penthouse must be nice, but it's a shorter fall from the basement. -Florida Evans

reply

Monroe Doctrine? Jesus you're probably a big fan of Manifest Destiny too

reply

The obsolete Jupiter missiles may have influenced the Russian placement of missiles in Cuba but the events depicted in the movie did unfold in substantially that way, as shown in Bobby Kennedy's book about the crisis, substantiated by the tapes of the Oval Office and Excom meetings.

reply

[deleted]

This movie is pretty good for both sides. Both superpowers were at fault

reply

Another factor in the equation that is forgotten is Berlin. A large fear at the time is that the Soviets would take West Berlin.

reply