Didn't the American Detective tell Herbert Greenleaf that Tom lied?
The American detective that Herbert Greenleaf hired did a background check on Tom Ripley and discovered that he had lied about attending Princeton as a student. You would think that he would have shared this information with Mr. Greenleaf. Hence Mr. Greenleaf would know that he hired Tom under false pretenses, i.e. he hired him because he thought that he knew his son as a fellow student at Princeton, when in fact that was obviously not the case since Tom wasn't even a student there. You would think this would have raised a red flag for both the detective and Mr. Greenleaf, as if Tom lied about this and took a job from Mr. Greenleaf under false pretenses, then what else could Tom be lying about? You would think that this, coupled with Marge stating that she thought that Tom was behind Dickie's murder, would have caused them to at least strongly consider the possibility that Tom had
something to do with Dickie's death. But the detective just mentions that he knows that Tom was never a student at Princeton and moves on, never mentioning it again, and Mr. Greenleaf never mentions it to Tom. This struck me
as peculiar. Thoughts anyone?