MovieChat Forums > Lola rennt (1999) Discussion > Run, Lola, Run and Multiverse Theory

Run, Lola, Run and Multiverse Theory


Hello, I am a student at Sinclair Community College and I am in proffesor Leonard's English 247 class, The art of Film. While watching this movie, I wondered what routes could be taken to tangibly answer some of the questions that the movie raises (like the alternate endings and related scenes within each sequence). I understand that part of watching a movie involves suspending reality so that some of these questions need not be answered. However, I thought it might pull more out to push the limits of how much of this might be possible in our own universe. Multiverse theory (as far as I understand it) is an idea that we live parallel to, possibly, an infinite amount of universes, and in each universe, a slight change may occur that deviates from the path that we are currently on. In other words, instead of taking a right, one might take a left and be late for work which results in being fired and a spiral into consequential events.
Run, Lola, Run demonstrates some of the same ideas. It takes a given variant from one universe and changes it (like Lola being tripped by the teenager on the steps) and records the consequential events afterwards. Looking at it this way allowed me to question how much of this might be a reality. Where could I be now had event A, B, or C not occurred? Where might other people around me be? Is the homeless man that I see holding the sign off of the main exit me in another universe? Entertaining the idea of it in the movie is one thing, but with what we know is possible in physics today, we might be able to do more than simply entertain but consider feasible. For me, this made the message of the movie more than a concept.
What is not a concept considered in Multiverse theory, but is demonstrated in the movie, is the interaction and lap over of each universe, like when Lola knows how to use a gun despite not demonstrating how to use it in the first universe until Manni shows her. Many people speak about intuition and gut feeling. The scene explored that idea in a unique way. This was the main thing that I took from this movie.
WQS

reply

WHWS Jack Frost- Good post. To begin my response, just a little bit of vocabulary. The theory of physics you are thinking of is the "many worlds" interpretation of the the quantum measurement problem. Very loosely, this theory contends that there is a parallel universe for each possible outcome of each and every quantum wave in the universe. There is a quantum wave for every elementary particle in the universe, so there is a virtual infinity of universes, covering every possible combination of quantum outcomes of all of the quantum waves. I point this out because there is a different theory of physics which postulates a "multiverse" which is not made up of parallel worlds, but (again) a virtual infinity of possible universes each based on slightly different physical laws. Under this theory, we happen to live in the "Goldilocks" universe where all the laws of physics are just right to allow for carbon based life forms like people, sunflowers and duck-billed platypuses. This theory is closely related to what is called the anthropic principle.

Anyway, if you look around at this board, you are not the only one to see the "many worlds" idea in "Run, Lola, Run." Of course, the parallel worlds Lola encounters are the results of her decisions rather than random outcomes of quantum mechanical events. This brings me around to my point (finally), which is that there is an excellent treatment of "many worlds"* and its possible ramifications on/through human decision making in Neal Stephenson's novel "Anathem." The ramifications include the possibility of worlds overlapping, as you say. Since you have an interest in literature (you took an English class, so its either your major or an elective you wanted) and also in ideas like many worlds, "Anathem" may be good selection for a Summer read.

* I have to say that as a theory of physics, "many worlds" is singularly unimpressive. It adds literally nothing to our understanding of quantum physics. Its only "value" is the attempt to explain away the bizarre and classically unfathomable nature of the quantum universe we inhabit.

reply

A cat is placed into a box with a gun connected to a Geiger counter, which is directed at a price of uranium. The box is closed and the uranium has a 50% chance of triggering the counter and therefore the gun, killing the cat. Does the cat live, or die? More importantly, what decides that fact? And if the cat died, is there another world where it is alive?

Obviously Schrödinger's cat would not be a very exciting movie. So we get the amazing Run, Lola, Run.

reply

I believe Schrödinger wrote an essay entitled "Lope, Ginger, Lope" on this very topic.

reply

😊

reply

And his other essay was called Punxatawney Phil

reply

I've read Schrödinger's "Murmeltier Tag" in the original German. I think it loses something in translation.

reply