MovieChat Forums > I Still Know What You Did Last Summer (1998) Discussion > Siskel and Ebert review 'I Still Know Wh...

Siskel and Ebert review 'I Still Know What You Did Last Summer'

posted 16 years ago by Swill_Merchant
9 replies | jump to latest

http://bventertainment.go.com/tv/buenavista/ebertandroeper/index2.html ?sec=6&subsec=i+still+know

[–] modeljames13 16 years ago

Two boring, old men with horrible taste in movies.

[–] WanderingGeek 16 years ago

Roger Ebert is an idiot. Not only did he not pay any attention to the movie, seeing as he was bitching about the answer Rio being wrong, and saying it was a goof in the movie, when IF he actually watched it, he would know it sets up the whole twist in the end.

Roger Ebert likes to TELL people how they feel about a movie and speaks for them. If HE hates a movie, then everyone else hates it. He's a retard.

Michael Scott: What is a Pap smear? Or is it shmear?

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] screamingwhisper04 15 years ago

Agreed. He's a d-bag who always thinks he's right. I think I've even read a letter that he's written to an actor that said something along the lines of "I'm the one who has the degree. I'm the one who is the critic. I'm the one who knows what's good."

He pisses me off.

"My name is Alice... and I remember everything."

[–] Hyman_Flomax 15 years ago

Roger Ebert is an idiot. Not only did he not pay any attention to the movie, seeing as he was bitching about the answer Rio being wrong, and saying it was a goof in the movie, when IF he actually watched it, he would know it sets up the whole twist in the end.

No, he caught on and apparently you didn't. Ebert was making fun of how stupid the characters were for guessing the capital incorrectly.

Roger Ebert likes to TELL people how they feel about a movie and speaks for them. If HE hates a movie, then everyone else hates it.

Provide for me an example of this. Otherwise it's just slanderous nonsense.

If I could drop dead right now, I'd be the happiest man alive.

[–] Coolestmovies 15 years ago

AWESOME review. These guys nailed a good number of the things that are wrong with this stupid movie. If only they had more time. I didn't always agree with them, but on this insultingly stupid picture (a revolver with NINE shots, including the misfire) by a remarkably poor first-time feature film writer who thankfully has never been allowed on movie screens since, they're absolutely right. To think of how many careers this movie crippled . . .

[–] koffeenkreame41-1 14 years ago

Fuzzy-navel, Ebert even dissed John Carpenter's The Thing, that was an amazing movie, he said it was too doomy. I'm not shocked at all that Ebert didn't like this movie, he thought the 3rd Mummy was the best in the series. WTF?

"I am the ultimate badass, you do not wanna `*beep*` wit' me!" Hudson in Aliens.

[–] WoodsboroFountain 14 years ago

On a fun/silly horror movie level, I'd rate I Still Know pretty high, it's so crazy! But, It's understandable that critics hate it, but I checked out some other S&E reviews of other horror movies, smart complex ones (Elm Street 3, New Nightmare, Candyman, Child's Play) and they really have/had no idea what the hell they're talking about!!!

[–] kurt7825 10 years ago

they were fools