As for stating the obvious...
The problem airing these issues on the imdb board is that they give the impression of a debate, without actually allowing one.
For instance... I can sit here, in my little liberal ghetto, with Che Guevara on the wall, Noam Chomsky on my shelves, and atheists.org or whatever in my bookmarks. I'm pro-choice, and nothing you say will convince me otherwise.
Whereas, you may be sat in a room with Jesus on the cross and the virgin Mary looking down at you, a Bible open on the table next to you and Hymns playing softly in the background. You have an unshakable faith in the correctness of whatever you've been told the Bible means, and I'm not about to change that.
Now, to enter into a realistic debate, you and I are gonna have to do some compromising. Maybe there's a way we could find agreement, but it's going to involve both of us letting go of our dogmas and taking a walk in the real world.
You see what I'm getting at? If either of us manages to shake the other's beliefs a little, we can just look around us for reassurance. It's like a war fought with harsh language instead of conventional arms.
Personally, I see the 'debate' as a vast number of isolated belief-ghettos, where any message coming from the other side is spun to fit the rationale.
But as for film discussion, imdb.com is the perfect place. Bring it on. Personally, I found TCR to be shallow and unconvincing, and it was the race issue I found the more unsettling. The black characters only existed to present the leads with moral choices, and were paper-thin. Not a patch on Halstrom's earlier film, 'Mit Liv Som Hund'.
Apologies for length of post, but I kinda like ideas that don't fit into soundbites.
reply
share